IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v14y1996i2p269-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Regeneration, Property Development, and the Land Market

Author

Listed:
  • C Jones

    (Department of Land Economics, University of Paisley, Paisley PA1 2BE, Scotland)

Abstract

The author examines the interactions between the process of grant aid to property developers for urban regeneration projects and the operation of land markets. He begins with a brief overview of this financial support, in which the basic principles of this assistance are set out. The author's principal purpose is to assess the fundamental input assumptions behind the public support of these projects. As a prerequisite he outlines the nature of the property-development decisionmaking process. In the subsequent analysis of the funding-appraisal process of urban regeneration projects he considers a number of issues about the level of the developer's profit, land values, and the value of completed projects. In conclusion the author makes an overall assessment of the approach to grant aid for urban regeneration.

Suggested Citation

  • C Jones, 1996. "Urban Regeneration, Property Development, and the Land Market," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 14(2), pages 269-279, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:14:y:1996:i:2:p:269-279
    DOI: 10.1068/c140269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c140269
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/c140269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I Turok, 1992. "Property-Led Urban Regeneration: Panacea or Placebo?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(3), pages 361-379, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Norman E. Hutchinson & Alastair Adair & Jim Burgess, 2001. "The valuation of urban regeneration land: A contemporary perspective," ERES eres2001_183, European Real Estate Society (ERES).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. N A Phelps, 1997. "A Hazard of New Fortunes: The Built Environment and Economic Development in Croydon," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 24(5), pages 643-645, October.
    2. Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, 2016. "City-as-a-Platform: The Rise of Participatory Innovation Platforms in Finnish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-31, September.
    3. Winifred Curran, 2004. "Gentrification and the Nature of Work: Exploring the Links in Williamsburg, Brooklyn," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(7), pages 1243-1258, July.
    4. Manuel Fernández-García & Clemente J. Navarro & Irene Gómez-Ramirez, 2021. "Evaluating Territorial Targets of European Integrated Urban Policy. The URBAN and URBANA Initiatives in Spain (1994–2013)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Levy, Deborah & Hills, Raewyn & Perkins, Harvey C. & Mackay, Michael & Campbell, Malcolm & Johnston, Karen, 2021. "Local benevolent property development entrepreneurs in small town regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. John Henneberry & Claire Roberts, 2008. "Calculated Inequality? Portfolio Benchmarking and Regional Office Property Investment in the UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1217-1241, May.
    7. Alastair Adair & Jim Berry & Stanley McGreal, 2003. "Financing Property's Contribution to Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(5-6), pages 1065-1080, May.
    8. John Edwards, 1995. "Social Policy and the City: A Review of Recent Policy Developments and Literature," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(4-5), pages 695-712, May.
    9. Laura Francis & Huw Thomas, 2006. "Evaluating Property-led Initiatives in Urban Regeneration: Tracing Vacancy Chains in Cardiff Bay," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 21(1), pages 49-64, February.
    10. S S Fainstein, 1994. "Government Programs for Commercial Redevelopment in Poor Neighborhoods: The Cases of Spitalfields in East London and Downtown Brooklyn, NY," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(2), pages 215-234, February.
    11. Edrissi, Ali & Poorzahedy, Hossain & Nassiri, Habibollah & Nourinejad, Mehdi, 2013. "A multi-agent optimization formulation of earthquake disaster prevention and management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 261-275.
    12. Peter Hall, 1997. "Regeneration Policies for Peripheral Housing Estates: Inward- and Outward-looking Approaches," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(5-6), pages 873-890, May.
    13. Jasper Beekmans & Huub Ploegmakers & Karel Martens & Erwin van der Krabben, 2016. "Countering decline of industrial sites: Do local economic development policies target the neediest places?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(14), pages 3027-3047, November.
    14. Patrick Loftman & Brendan Nevin, 1994. "Prestige project developments: Economic renaissance or economic myth? A case study of Birmingham," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 8(4), pages 307-325, February.
    15. Wu, Qiyan & Zhang, Xiaoling & Shang, Zhengyong & Li, Zaijun, 2015. "Political-economy based institutional industry complex and sustainable development: The case of the salt-chemical industry in Huai’an, China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 39-47.
    16. Moira Munro, 1993. "Evaluating the Links between Housing Change and Economic Change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 387-397, March.
    17. Ahoura Zandiatashbar & Carla Maria Kayanan, 2020. "Negative Consequences of Innovation-Igniting Urban Developments: Empirical Evidence from Three US Cities," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 378-391.
    18. Kenneth Gibb & Martin Hoesli, 2003. "Developments in Urban Housing and Property Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(5-6), pages 887-896, May.
    19. Dimitris Ballas & Graham P Clarke, 2001. "Modelling the Local Impacts of National Social Policies: A Spatial Microsimulation Approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 19(4), pages 587-606, August.
    20. Nick Bailey & Douglas Robertson, 1997. "Housing Renewal, Urban Policy and Gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(4), pages 561-578, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:14:y:1996:i:2:p:269-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.