IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v51y2024i7p1715-1718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender differences in spatio-temporal dynamics: Visualizing bike-sharing mobility patterns in New York City

Author

Listed:
  • Guiyu Chen
  • Chaosu Li

Abstract

Urban spaces distinctly modulate the mobility patterns of men and women, with new mobility modes manifesting gender differences. In this study, by visualizing bike-sharing mobility patterns in New York City, we reveal significant disparities in cycling usage between males and females. During weekdays, the findings highlight a pattern of male dominance in most areas, particularly in business districts. In some recreational and residential areas, routes with higher proportions of female cyclists are observed. Additionally, weekends experience a surge in the proportion of female cyclists, predominantly in leisure-oriented locations. These findings highlighted the need for urban planning to account for gender differences across space and time to meet diverse mobility needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Guiyu Chen & Chaosu Li, 2024. "Gender differences in spatio-temporal dynamics: Visualizing bike-sharing mobility patterns in New York City," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1715-1718, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:7:p:1715-1718
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083241258521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241258521
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083241258521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Kailai & Akar, Gulsah, 2019. "Gender gap generators for bike share ridership: Evidence from Citi Bike system in New York City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Laetitia Gauvin & Michele Tizzoni & Simone Piaggesi & Andrew Young & Natalia Adler & Stefaan Verhulst & Leo Ferres & Ciro Cattuto, 2020. "Gender gaps in urban mobility," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radzimski, Adam & Dzięcielski, Michał, 2021. "Exploring the relationship between bike-sharing and public transport in Poznań, Poland," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 189-202.
    2. Ali Enes Dingil & Federico Rupi & Domokos Esztergár-Kiss, 2021. "An Integrative Review of Socio-Technical Factors Influencing Travel Decision-Making and Urban Transport Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Basso, Franco & Cox, Tomás & Pezoa, Raúl & Maldonado, Tomás & Varas, Mauricio, 2024. "Characterizing last-mile freight transportation using mobile phone data: The case of Santiago, Chile," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    4. Lili Yang & Simeng Fei & Hongfei Jia & Jingdong Qi & Luyao Wang & Xinning Hu, 2023. "Study on the Relationship between the Spatial Distribution of Shared Bicycle Travel Demand and Urban Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Bittencourt, Tainá A. & Giannotti, Mariana, 2023. "Evaluating the accessibility and availability of public services to reduce inequalities in everyday mobility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    6. Sweet, Matthias N. & Scott, Darren M., 2021. "Shared mobility adoption from 2016 to 2018 in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: Demographic or geographic diffusion?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    7. Lazarus, Jessica & Pourquier, Jean Carpentier & Feng, Frank & Hammel, Henry & Shaheen, Susan, 2020. "Micromobility evolution and expansion: Understanding how docked and dockless bikesharing models complement and compete – A case study of San Francisco," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Borker, Girija, 2024. "Understanding the constraints to women’s use of urban public transport in developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    9. Chen, Zhiwei & Guo, Yujie & Stuart, Amy L. & Zhang, Yu & Li, Xiaopeng, 2019. "Exploring the equity performance of bike-sharing systems with disaggregated data: A story of southern Tampa," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 529-545.
    10. Alessia Calafiore & Krasen Samardzhiev & Francisco Rowe & Martin Fleischmann & Daniel Arribas-Bel, 2024. "Inequalities in experiencing urban functions. An exploration of human digital (geo-)footprints," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1463-1477, September.
    11. Alejandro Ortega Hortelano & Monica Grosso & Gary Haq & Anastasios Tsakalidis, 2021. "Women in Transport Research and Innovation: A European Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Sherriff, Graeme & Adams, Mags & Blazejewski, Luke & Davies, Nick & Kamerāde, Daiga, 2020. "From Mobike to no bike in Greater Manchester: Using the capabilities approach to explore Europe's first wave of dockless bike share," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    13. Li, Aoyong & Zhao, Pengxiang & Huang, Yizhe & Gao, Kun & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "An empirical analysis of dockless bike-sharing utilization and its explanatory factors: Case study from Shanghai, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    14. Contreras, Hugo Alejandro & Candia, Cristian & Olchevskaia, Rodrigo Vladislav Troncoso & Ferres, Leo & Celedón, María Loreto Bravo & Lepri, Bruno & Rodriguez-Sickert, Carlos, 2023. "Linking Physical Violence to Women's Mobility in Chile," SocArXiv uad59, Center for Open Science.
    15. Böcker, Lars & Anderson, Ellinor, 2020. "Interest-adoption discrepancies, mechanisms of mediation and socio-spatial inclusiveness in bike-sharing: The case of nine urban regions in Norway," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 266-277.
    16. Andrés Leiva-Araos & Héctor Allende-Cid, 2021. "A Hierarchical Fuzzy-Based Correction Algorithm for the Neighboring Network Hit Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-36, February.
    17. Miriam Pirra & Sofia Kalakou & Angela Carboni & Mariana Costa & Marco Diana & Ana Rita Lynce, 2021. "A Preliminary Analysis on Gender Aspects in Transport Systems and Mobility Services: Presentation of a Survey Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Areum Jo & Sang-Kyeong Lee & Jaecheol Kim, 2020. "Gender Gaps in the Use of Urban Space in Seoul: Analyzing Spatial Patterns of Temporary Populations Using Mobile Phone Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Jennifer Oxley & David B. Logan & Selby Coxon & Sjaan Koppel, 2022. "Understanding Current and Future Transport Needs of Older Australian Drivers to Guide Development of Sustainable and Smart Initiatives to Support Safe Mobility of Older Adults," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, May.
    20. Tiziana Campisi & Nurten Akgün & Dario Ticali & Giovanni Tesoriere, 2020. "Exploring Public Opinion on Personal Mobility Vehicle Use: A Case Study in Palermo, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:7:p:1715-1718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.