IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v51y2024i7p1563-1580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards urban place-based resilience modeling: Mixed methods for a flood resilience assessment index

Author

Listed:
  • Brad Bottoms
  • Julie Arbit
  • Earl Lewis
  • Alford Young Jr

Abstract

Large-scale socioeconomic vulnerability models commonly used in flood hazard assessments grapple with data limitations and struggle to fully capture diversity in vulnerability and resilience stemming from America’s sociopolitical history. In response, we developed a prototype for a place-based Flood Resilience Assessment Index (FRAI) using tract-level geographies that illustrates human-centric frameworks for quantifying flood resilience in the U.S. For these purposes, we define flood resilience as the likelihood a tract will rebound from a flood disaster. This framework can be used in tandem with flood risk models. We employ mixed methods in geospatial processing, including dasymetric interpolation and network analysis to model access. We also standardize variables by percentage to enable temporal analyses and equity-centered narrative framing. While the resulting scores for a five-county pilot study correlate with those of leading vulnerability indices, FRAI leverages diverse data sources and novel methods to represent the changing landscapes, resources, and needs of urban cores and growing suburbs. Future trajectories for FRAI will continue to define and refine methods for diverse datasets, employ participatory methods for emergency managers and residents of flood-prone communities in value-setting, weighting, and validation, and identify policy and practice avenues.

Suggested Citation

  • Brad Bottoms & Julie Arbit & Earl Lewis & Alford Young Jr, 2024. "Towards urban place-based resilience modeling: Mixed methods for a flood resilience assessment index," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1563-1580, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:7:p:1563-1580
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083241243104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083241243104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083241243104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:7:p:1563-1580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.