IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v51y2024i5p1124-1136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the spatial statistical properties of a real estate listings point pattern in San José, Costa Rica

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo Pérez-Molina

Abstract

One should expect real estate sales, and properties listed as for sale, to be concentrated on market hotspots. Using data of real estate listings from San José, Costa Rica, this expected clustering is examined using point pattern processes of detached housing, apartments, and vacant lots. Non-stationary G and J functions describe the patterns and their interactions. Potential determinants of the point pattern were selected based on previous studies and theory. Their effect on the point pattern was estimated using an inhomogeneous Poisson model, with its intensity a lognormal function of the determinants. Results show detached houses, apartments, and lots are all clustered point patterns. The cross density (joint G function) of houses with apartments and with lots exhibits clustering, suggesting the patterns are related; however, the cross density of apartments and lots is no different from a Poisson distribution (they are not related). The inhomogeneous Poisson model with Euclidean distance to the central business district (CBD), nearest municipal center, and nearest main road, as well as elevation and slope, proved better than homogeneous Poisson models in explaining the point patterns of houses, apartments, and lots.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo Pérez-Molina, 2024. "Understanding the spatial statistical properties of a real estate listings point pattern in San José, Costa Rica," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(5), pages 1124-1136, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:5:p:1124-1136
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083231208230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083231208230
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083231208230?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucia Paci & Alan E. Gelfand & and María Asunción Beamonte & Pilar Gargallo & Manuel Salvador, 2020. "Spatial hedonic modelling adjusted for preferential sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(1), pages 169-192, January.
    2. Bertaud, Alain & Brueckner, Jan K., 2005. "Analyzing building-height restrictions: predicted impacts and welfare costs," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 109-125, March.
    3. Alan E. Gelfand & Sujit K. Sahu & David M. Holland, 2012. "On the effect of preferential sampling in spatial prediction," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(7), pages 565-578, November.
    4. Trounstine, Jessica, 2020. "The Geography of Inequality: How Land Use Regulation Produces Segregation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(2), pages 443-455, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian Conroy & Lance A. Waller & Ian D. Buller & Gregory M. Hacker & James R. Tucker & Mark G. Novak, 2023. "A Shared Latent Process Model to Correct for Preferential Sampling in Disease Surveillance Systems," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 28(3), pages 483-501, September.
    2. Li, Jiewei & Lu, Ming & Lu, Tianyi, 2022. "Constructing compact cities: How urban regeneration can enhance growth and relieve congestion," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    3. Christian A. L. Hilber, 2017. "The Economic Implications of House Price Capitalization: A Synthesis," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 45(2), pages 301-339, April.
    4. Kostas Rontos & Barbara Ermini & Luca Salvati, 2023. "Enlarging the divide? Per-Capita Income as a measure of social inequalities in a southern European City," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 345-361, February.
    5. Denant-Boemont, Laurent & Gaigné, Carl & Gaté, Romain, 2018. "Urban spatial structure, transport-related emissions and welfare," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 29-45.
    6. Aubry, Philippe & Francesiaz, Charlotte & Guillemain, Matthieu, 2024. "On the impact of preferential sampling on ecological status and trend assessment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).
    7. Mariano Kulish & Anthony Richards & Christian Gillitzer, 2012. "Urban Structure and Housing Prices: Some Evidence from Australian Cities," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 88(282), pages 303-322, September.
    8. Le Blanc, David, 2005. "Economic evaluation of housing subsidy systems: a methodology with application to Morocco," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3529, The World Bank.
    9. C. Forlani & S. Bhatt & M. Cameletti & E. Krainski & M. Blangiardo, 2020. "A joint Bayesian space–time model to integrate spatially misaligned air pollution data in R‐INLA," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(8), December.
    10. William Larson, 2015. "New Estimates of Value of Land of the United States," BEA Working Papers 0120, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    11. Cai, Hongbin & Wang, Zhi & Zhang, Qinghua, 2017. "To build above the limit? Implementation of land use regulations in urban China," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 223-233.
    12. Tikoudis, Ioannis & Verhoef, Erik T. & van Ommeren, Jos N., 2018. "Second-best urban tolls in a monocentric city with housing market regulations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 342-359.
    13. Agrawal, David R. & Zhao, Weihua, 2023. "Taxing Uber," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Lucia Paci & Alan E. Gelfand & and María Asunción Beamonte & Pilar Gargallo & Manuel Salvador, 2020. "Spatial hedonic modelling adjusted for preferential sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(1), pages 169-192, January.
    15. Cheshire, Paul, 2009. "Urban land markets and policy failures," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 30837, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Paul C. Cheshire & Christian A. L. Hilber, 2008. "Office Space Supply Restrictions in Britain: The Political Economy of Market Revenge," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(529), pages 185-221, June.
    17. William Larson & Weihua Zhao, 2017. "Telework: Urban Form, Energy Consumption, And Greenhouse Gas Implications," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(2), pages 714-735, April.
    18. Jan K. Brueckner & Shihe Fu & Yizhen Gu & Junfu Zhang, 2017. "Measuring the Stringency of Land Use Regulation: The Case of China's Building Height Limits," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 99(4), pages 663-677, July.
    19. Remi Jedwab & Prakash Loungani & Anthony Yezer, 2019. "How Should We Measure City Size? Theory and Evidence Within and Across Rich and Poor Countries," Working Papers 2019-11, The George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy.
    20. Paul Charles Cheshire & Katerina Kaimakamis, 2022. "Offices scarce but housing scarcer: Estimating the premium for London office conversions," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 50(3), pages 743-766, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:5:p:1124-1136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.