IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v50y2023i3p814-830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing the performance of virtual reality in urban planning: Evidence from a View corridor Virtual Reality project, Beijing

Author

Listed:
  • Huaxiong Jiang
  • Stan Geertman
  • Hao Zhang
  • Shangyi Zhou

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) technologies, as new forms of planning support systems (PSSs), are becoming increasingly vital to planning. However, there is a lack of empirical research on factors influencing VR’s supportive role from a user perspective, thus producing barriers to VR’s advancement in planning practices. This neglect motivates the focus of this study, in which we adapt relevant PSS theory to build a conceptual framework that examines factors influencing VR performance in an experience-based environment. Empirical data are gathered predominantly through students’ experiences with and evaluation of the “Viewing the Western Hills at Yinding Bridge†( Yinding Guanshan ) VR Project—a VR system developed to optimize the view corridor of Beijing’s Western Hills. The results show large variability in factors influencing VR performance. In general, the effects of six factors are significant, including 3D visualization, simulating real-world scenes, user-friendliness, interactivity, inspiring participants’ enthusiasm, and inspiring creative thinking. These factors are attributed to the functionality, usability and innovativeness dimensions of VR systems. This study concludes that to realize the supportive and useful role of VR in planning, at minimum, these six factors should be explicitly taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Huaxiong Jiang & Stan Geertman & Hao Zhang & Shangyi Zhou, 2023. "Factors influencing the performance of virtual reality in urban planning: Evidence from a View corridor Virtual Reality project, Beijing," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(3), pages 814-830, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:50:y:2023:i:3:p:814-830
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083221130709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083221130709
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083221130709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dan Shao & I-Jui Lee, 2020. "Acceptance and Influencing Factors of Social Virtual Reality in the Urban Elderly," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Cowan, Kirsten & Ketron, Seth, 2019. "A dual model of product involvement for effective virtual reality: The roles of imagination, co-creation, telepresence, and interactivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 483-492.
    3. Haozhi Pan & Yoonshin Kwak & Brian Deal, 2022. "Participatory Development of Planning Support Systems to Improve Empowerment and Localization," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 33-54, April.
    4. Pelzer, Peter, 2017. "Usefulness of planning support systems: A conceptual framework and an empirical illustration," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 84-95.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathalie Fleck-Dousteyssier & Amélie Lachat & Emmanuelle Le Nagard, 2021. "L’hyperréalisme induit par les images en ultra-haute définition : Quand l'amélioration de la qualité de l'image détériore l'expérience de visionnage," Post-Print hal-04455259, HAL.
    2. Xi, Nannan & Hamari, Juho, 2021. "Shopping in virtual reality: A literature review and future agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 37-58.
    3. Savastano Marco & Anagnoste Sorin, 2020. "Pioneering Strategies in Retail Settings: An Empirical Study of Successful Practices," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(4), pages 643-663, December.
    4. Zeng, Guojun & Cao, Xinning & Lin, Zhibin & Xiao, Sarah H., 2020. "When online reviews meet virtual reality: Effects on consumer hotel booking," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Wedel, Michel & Bigné, Enrique & Zhang, Jie, 2020. "Virtual and augmented reality: Advancing research in consumer marketing," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 443-465.
    6. Abbasi, Amir Zaib & Qummar, Hamza & Bashir, Shahid & Aziz, Shahab & Ting, Ding Hooi, 2024. "Customer engagement in Saudi food delivery apps through social media marketing: Examining the antecedents and consequences using PLS-SEM and NCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Flavián, Carlos & Ibáñez-Sánchez, Sergio & Orús, Carlos, 2021. "The influence of scent on virtual reality experiences: The role of aroma-content congruence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 289-301.
    8. Huaxiong Jiang & Stan Geertman & Patrick Witte, 2020. "Avoiding the planning support system pitfalls? What smart governance can learn from the planning support system implementation gap," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1343-1360, October.
    9. Xiaohong Zhang & Na Li & Yanbo Wang & Yanqi Sun, 2023. "The Effect of Product Placement Strategies on Customer Behavior: A Prospective of Foote, Cone and Belding (FCB) Grid Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    10. de Regt, Anouk & Barnes, Stuart J. & Plangger, Kirk, 2020. "The virtual reality value chain," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 737-748.
    11. Hang To Diem Tran & Minsook Kim, 2023. "Factors Influencing the Continued Intent to Use Virtual Interactive Platforms in Korean Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises for Remote and Hybrid Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Jafar, Rana Muhammad Sohail & Ahmad, Wasim & Sun, Yanming, 2023. "Unfolding the impacts of metaverse aspects on telepresence, product knowledge, and purchase intentions in the metaverse stores," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    13. Kim, Gwia & Jin, Byoungho & Shin, Daeun Chloe, 2022. "Virtual reality as a promotion tool for small independent stores," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Kautish, Pradeep & Paul, Justin & Sharma, Rajesh, 2021. "The effect of assortment and fulfillment on shopping assistance and efficiency: An e-tail servicescape perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    15. de Regt, Anouk & Plangger, Kirk & Barnes, Stuart J., 2021. "Virtual reality marketing and customer advocacy: Transforming experiences from story-telling to story-doing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 513-522.
    16. Cowan, Kirsten & Ketron, Seth & Kostyk, Alena & Kristofferson, Kirk, 2023. "Can you smell the (virtual) roses? The influence of olfactory cues in virtual reality on immersion and positive brand responses," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 385-399.
    17. Swetarupa Chatterjee & Naman Sreen & Jyoti Rana & Amandeep Dhir & Pradip H. Sadarangani, 2022. "Impact of ethical certifications and product involvement on consumers decision to purchase ethical products at price premiums in an emerging market context," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 19(4), pages 737-762, December.
    18. Pizzi, Gabriele & Vannucci, Virginia & Aiello, Gaetano, 2020. "Branding in the time of virtual reality: Are virtual store brand perceptions real?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 502-510.
    19. Sadie McEvoy & Frans H. M. van de Ven & Reinder Brolsma & Jill H. Slinger, 2019. "Evaluating a Planning Support System’s Use and Effects in Urban Adaptation: An Exploratory Case Study from Berlin, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    20. Claire Daniel & Christopher Pettit, 2022. "Charting the past and possible futures of planning support systems: Results of a citation network analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(7), pages 1875-1892, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:50:y:2023:i:3:p:814-830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.