IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v49y2022i3p898-914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of tree shade effectiveness and its renewal strategy in typical historic districts: A case study in Harbin, China

Author

Listed:
  • Guanghao Li
  • Nan He
  • Changhong Zhan

Abstract

China’s rapid and extraordinary urbanisation has resulted in a dichotomy between the urban form of historic districts and that of new urban areas. Unlike the new planning of new urban areas, the optimisation of the thermal environment in historic districts is achieved through an important means of regulating the shading effectiveness of trees in street canyons, without destruction of current buildings in existing districts. In this paper, the sky view factor, an index for evaluating the shading capacity of street canyons, is used to calculate the shading efficiency of trees and reveal their influence mechanism by using a convolutional neural network (SegNet) to segment the Baidu street view images. The results show that: (1) tree shading in Harbin’s historic districts has a significant impact on the thermal environment of street canyons, with an average shade effectiveness of 56.3%; (2) based on geospatial autocorrelation analysis and a typological reconstruction of street canyons, the study reveals that tree shading has significant spatial aggregation characteristics in historic districts and proposes guidelines for the planning and design of different types of street canyon trees. The study provides important data and strategic support for optimising the thermal environment of urban historic districts in Northeast China.

Suggested Citation

  • Guanghao Li & Nan He & Changhong Zhan, 2022. "Evaluation of tree shade effectiveness and its renewal strategy in typical historic districts: A case study in Harbin, China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(3), pages 898-914, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:3:p:898-914
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083211029653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083211029653
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083211029653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ariane Middel & Jonas Lukasczyk & Ross Maciejewski, 2017. "Sky View Factors from Synthetic Fisheye Photos for Thermal Comfort Routing—A Case Study in Phoenix, Arizona," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(1), pages 19-30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yiwei Bai & Yihang Bai & Ruoyu Wang & Tianren Yang & Xinyao Song & Bo Bai, 2023. "Exploring Associations between the Built Environment and Cycling Behaviour around Urban Greenways from a Human-Scale Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Djihed Berkouk & Tallal Abdel Karim Bouzir & Luigi Maffei & Massimiliano Masullo, 2020. "Examining the Associations between Oases Soundscape Components and Walking Speed: Correlation or Causation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Xuexiu Zhao & Yanwen Luo & Jiang He, 2020. "Analysis of the Thermal Environment in Pedestrian Space Using 3D Thermal Imaging," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Guo, Hongshan & Aviv, Dorit & Loyola, Mauricio & Teitelbaum, Eric & Houchois, Nicholas & Meggers, Forrest, 2020. "On the understanding of the mean radiant temperature within both the indoor and outdoor environment, a critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Kousis, I. & Manni, M. & Pisello, A.L., 2022. "Environmental mobile monitoring of urban microclimates: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:49:y:2022:i:3:p:898-914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.