IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v42y2015i3p541-563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling Class Uncertainty in the Geodemographic Output Area Classification

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Fisher
  • Nicholas J Tate

Abstract

Geodemographics is the study of people by where they live, and historically has relied in part on census information to provide essential variables. In 2005 the Office for National Statistics for England and Wales published a geodemographic classification of output areas (OAs; the smallest published areas of enumeration for the UK) of the 2001 UK Census. Uniquely among UK examples of such classifications not only are the classes to which each OA is assigned published for free with no restriction on use, but the difference between each OA and all class centroids are also made available. In this paper these differences (being Euclidian distances in the classification feature space) are used to introduce uncertainty by softening the classification using the methods derived from fuzzy c -means and the possibilistic c -means classifications. The former applies a probabilistic assumption that all fuzzy memberships for a particular OA sum to unity while the latter does not. This assumption (which is the same as that behind the published OA classification) may generate results which are potentially misleading because the fuzzy c -means method forces OAs into classes to which they may have relatively little similarity while minimising the importance of classes to which they may have a larger affinity. If the fuzzy memberships or possibilities were to be integrated with other socioeconomic variables which are also conceived as fuzzy sets for geodemographic applications (decision making for government resource allocation, site location modelling or marketing, for example), then the two results would produce different outcomes. It is suggested that the possibilistic c -means are the more useful although they do lead to the possibly confusing but analytically rich situation where one OA may have minimal affinity with any class, at the same time as others may have strong affinity with many classes.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Fisher & Nicholas J Tate, 2015. "Modelling Class Uncertainty in the Geodemographic Output Area Classification," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 42(3), pages 541-563, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:42:y:2015:i:3:p:541-563
    DOI: 10.1068/b130176p
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b130176p
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b130176p?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Brunsdon & Paul Longley & Alex Singleton & David Ashby, 2011. "Predicting participation in higher education: a comparative evaluation of the performance of geodemographic classifications," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 174(1), pages 17-30, January.
    2. Alexander D. Singleton & Paul A. Longley, 2009. "Creating open source geodemographics: Refining a national classification of census output areas for applications in higher education," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(3), pages 643-666, August.
    3. Dan Vickers & Phil Rees, 2007. "Creating the UK National Statistics 2001 output area classification," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(2), pages 379-403, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amanda Otley & Michelle Morris & Andy Newing & Mark Birkin, 2021. "Local and Application-Specific Geodemographics for Data-Led Urban Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, April.
    2. A. Singleton & A. Wilson & O. O’Brien, 2012. "Geodemographics and spatial interaction: an integrated model for higher education," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 223-241, April.
    3. Chris Brunsdon & Paul Longley & Alex Singleton & David Ashby, 2011. "Predicting participation in higher education: a comparative evaluation of the performance of geodemographic classifications," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 174(1), pages 17-30, January.
    4. Bardsley, Nicholas & Büchs, Milena & James, Patrick & Papafragkou, Anastasios & Rushby, Thomas & Saunders, Clare & Smith, Graham & Wallbridge, Rebecca & Woodman, Nicholas, 2019. "Domestic thermal upgrades, community action and energy saving: A three-year experimental study of prosperous households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 475-485.
    5. Federico Benassi & Marica D'Elia & Francesca Petrei, 2021. "The “meso” dimension of territorial capital: Evidence from Italy," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 159-175, February.
    6. Richard Harris & Yingyu Feng, 2016. "Putting the geography into geodemographics: Using multilevel modelling to improve neighbourhood targeting – a case study of Asian pupils in London," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(2), pages 93-107, July.
    7. Fenton, Alex, 2013. "Small-area measures of income poverty," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 58053, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. repec:cep:sticas:/173 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Holt, Alison R. & Mears, Meghann & Maltby, Lorraine & Warren, Philip, 2015. "Understanding spatial patterns in the production of multiple urban ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 33-46.
    10. Druckman, A. & Jackson, T., 2008. "Household energy consumption in the UK: A highly geographically and socio-economically disaggregated model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 3167-3182, August.
    11. Hache, Emmanuel & Leboullenger, Déborah & Mignon, Valérie, 2017. "Beyond average energy consumption in the French residential housing market: A household classification approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 82-95.
    12. Brian Robson & Kitty Lymperopoulou & Alasdair Rae, 2008. "People on the Move: Exploring the Functional Roles of Deprived Neighbourhoods," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(11), pages 2693-2714, November.
    13. Levi J Wolf & Elijah Knaap & Sergio Rey, 2021. "Geosilhouettes: Geographical measures of cluster fit," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(3), pages 521-539, March.
    14. Demetris Lamnisos & Nicos Middleton & Nikoletta Kyprianou & Michael A. Talias, 2019. "Geodemographic Area Classification and Association with Mortality: An Ecological Study of Small Areas of Cyprus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-13, August.
    15. Nick Malleson & Alison Heppenstall & Linda See & Andrew Evans, 2013. "Using an Agent-Based Crime Simulation to Predict the Effects of Urban Regeneration on Individual Household Burglary Risk," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(3), pages 405-426, June.
    16. Jonathan Reades & Jordan De Souza & Phil Hubbard, 2019. "Understanding urban gentrification through machine learning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(5), pages 922-942, April.
    17. Alexander D. Singleton & Paul A. Longley, 2009. "Creating open source geodemographics: Refining a national classification of census output areas for applications in higher education," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(3), pages 643-666, August.
    18. Yingling Fan, 2010. "Reexamining Contemporary Urbanism in the United States: Convenient Mix of the Old and New," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(12), pages 2897-2913, December.
    19. Liao, Cong & Scheuer, Bronte, 2022. "Evaluating the performance of transit-oriented development in Beijing metro station areas: Integrating morphology and demand into the node-place model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    20. Alex Fenton, 2013. "Small-area measures of income poverty," CASE - Social Policy in a Cold Climate Working Paper 01, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    21. Sabrina Bunyan & Alan Collins, 2013. "Digital Exclusion Despite Digital Accessibility: Empirical Evidence from an English City," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 104(5), pages 588-603, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:42:y:2015:i:3:p:541-563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.