IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v41y2014i4p594-612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Adaptive Policies: A Way to Improve the Cost—Benefit Performance of Megaprojects?

Author

Listed:
  • Jerrel R Yzer
  • Warren E Walker
  • Vincent A W J Marchau

    (Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University, PO Box 9108, 6500 HK Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

  • Jan H Kwakkel

    (Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5015, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Megaprojects are large, costly, complex infrastructure projects. To assess the financial viability of a megaproject, a cost—benefit analysis (CBA) is usually performed; the results depend upon the accuracy of the cost estimations and the predictive models used to forecast future demand for the use of the infrastructure. The outcomes of the models are very vulnerable to unexpected events. As a result, the CBA may become unreliable and give an unrealistic picture of the financial viability of a project. An alternative way of policy making that tries to take uncertainty into account is the dynamic adaptive policy (DAP) approach. This approach involves a systematic method for designing and implementing a policy over time that is based on a clear set of constraints and objectives and that involves monitoring the environment, gathering information, and adjusting and readjusting to new circumstances. The efficacy of this type of policy making has already been shown, but whether DAP leads to a better cost—benefit performance of megaprojects is unknown. In this paper we focus on answering two research questions: How can CBA be applied to DAP? How good is the cost—benefit performance of megaprojects when using DAP compared with the cost—benefit performance when using the static policy-making approach? In this paper a framework based on real options theory is specified, enabling a CBA to be performed on a dynamic adaptive policy. This framework is then applied to a case involving Schiphol Airport, Amsterdam, to compare the cost—benefit performance of the static policy with the cost—benefit performance using the DAP approach. For this case, the cost—benefit performance of the megaproject under the DAP approach turns out to be better compared with its performance under the static policy. This result provides a first indication that adaptive policies might be able to improve the cost—benefit performance of megaprojects.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerrel R Yzer & Warren E Walker & Vincent A W J Marchau & Jan H Kwakkel, 2014. "Dynamic Adaptive Policies: A Way to Improve the Cost—Benefit Performance of Megaprojects?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 41(4), pages 594-612, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:41:y:2014:i:4:p:594-612
    DOI: 10.1068/b39088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b39088
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b39088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marchau, Vincent & Walker, Warren & van Duin, Ron, 2008. "An adaptive approach to implementing innovative urban transport solutions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 405-412, November.
    2. Viscusi, W Kip & Aldy, Joseph E, 2003. "The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates throughout the World," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 5-76, August.
    3. Flyvbjerg,Bent & Bruzelius,Nils & Rothengatter,Werner, 2003. "Megaprojects and Risk," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521009461, September.
    4. Cherie Lu & Peter Morrell, 2006. "Determination and Applications of Environmental Costs at Different Sized Airports – Aircraft Noise and Engine Emissions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 45-61, January.
    5. M. Haasnoot & H. Middelkoop & E. van Beek & W. P. A. van Deursen, 2011. "A method to develop sustainable water management strategies for an uncertain future," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(6), pages 369-381, November.
    6. Walker, Warren E. & Rahman, S. Adnan & Cave, Jonathan, 2001. "Adaptive policies, policy analysis, and policy-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 282-289, January.
    7. repec:reg:rpubli:282 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Shunxi & Sui, Pang-Chieh & Xiao, Jinsheng & Chahine, Richard, 2019. "Policy formulation for highly automated vehicles: Emerging importance, research frontiers and insights," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 573-586.
    2. B. Gersonius & J. Rijke & R. Ashley & P. Bloemen & E. Kelder & C. Zevenbergen, 2016. "Adaptive Delta Management for flood risk and resilience in Dordrecht, The Netherlands," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(2), pages 201-216, June.
    3. Sandrine Mathy & Patrick Criqui & Katharina Knoop & Manfred Fischedick & Sascha Samadi, 2016. "Uncertainty management and the dynamic adjustment of deep decarbonization pathways," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(sup1), pages 47-62, June.
    4. Viera, Oscar & Malekpour, Shirin, 2020. "An analysis of adaptive planning capacity: The case of chilean water utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    5. Marjolijn Haasnoot & Hans Middelkoop & Astrid Offermans & Eelco Beek & Willem Deursen, 2012. "Exploring pathways for sustainable water management in river deltas in a changing environment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 795-819, December.
    6. Dittrich, Ruth & Wreford, Anita & Moran, Dominic, 2016. "A survey of decision-making approaches for climate change adaptation: Are robust methods the way forward?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 79-89.
    7. Michas, Serafeim & Stavrakas, Vassilis & Papadelis, Sotiris & Flamos, Alexandros, 2020. "A transdisciplinary modeling framework for the participatory design of dynamic adaptive policy pathways," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    8. Jan H Kwakkel & Warren E Walker & Vincent A W J Marchau, 2012. "Assessing the Efficacy of Dynamic Adaptive Planning of Infrastructure: Results from Computational Experiments," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(3), pages 533-550, June.
    9. Malekpour, Shirin & de Haan, Fjalar J. & Brown, Rebekah R., 2016. "A methodology to enable exploratory thinking in strategic planning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 192-202.
    10. Warren E. Walker & Marjolijn Haasnoot & Jan H. Kwakkel, 2013. "Adapt or Perish: A Review of Planning Approaches for Adaptation under Deep Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-25, March.
    11. Florio, Massimo & Sirtori, Emanuela, 2016. "Social benefits and costs of large scale research infrastructures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 65-78.
    12. Kaye, Sherrie-Anne & Buckley, Lisa & Rakotonirainy, Andry & Delhomme, Patricia, 2019. "An adaptive approach for trialling fully automated vehicles in Queensland Australia: A brief report," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 275-281.
    13. Massimo FLORIO & Emanuela SIRTORI, 2014. "The Evaluation of Research Infrastructures: a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework," Departmental Working Papers 2014-10, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    14. Ahsan Nawaz & Xing Su & Qaiser Mohi Ud Din & Muhammad Irslan Khalid & Muhammad Bilal & Syyed Adnan Raheel Shah, 2020. "Identification of the H&S (Health and Safety Factors) Involved in Infrastructure Projects in Developing Countries-A Sequential Mixed Method Approach of OLMT-Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Schaffner, Sandra & Spengler, Hannes, 2005. "Der Einfluss unbeobachteter Heterogenität auf kompensatorische Lohndifferentiale und den Wert eines Statistischen Lebens: Eine mikroökonometrische Parallelanalyse mit IABS und SOEP," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 36800, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    16. Cantarelli, C.C. & Flyvbjerg, B. & Buhl, S.L., 2012. "Geographical variation in project cost performance: the Netherlands versus worldwide," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 324-331.
    17. French, Michael T. & Gumus, Gulcin & Homer, Jenny F., 2009. "Public policies and motorcycle safety," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 831-838, July.
    18. Reichardt, Kristin & Rogge, Karoline S. & Negro, Simona, 2015. "Unpacking the policy processes for addressing systemic problems: The case of the technological innovation system of offshore wind in Germany," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S2/2015, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    19. Gopal K. Basak & Chandramauli Chakraborty & Pranab Kumar Das, 2021. "Optimal Lockdown Strategy in a Pandemic: An Exploratory Analysis for Covid-19," Papers 2109.02512, arXiv.org.
    20. Zhao, Na, 2019. "Managing interactive collaborative mega project supply chains under infectious risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 275-286.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:41:y:2014:i:4:p:594-612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.