IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v56y2024i6p1731-1737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking value in land and negotiating the city’s social future

Author

Listed:
  • Mi Shih

    (Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA)

  • Kathe Newman

    (Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA)

Abstract

In a context of global competition for capital, austerity politics, municipal entrepreneurialism and financialization, land is increasingly seen as a source of money for fiscal revenue. Mechanisms of land value capture, as a consequence, have accelerated forces of land monetization and commodification in recent years. This special issue is a collective attempt to rethink the concept, practice and politics of value in land development. Seven authors bring two, still largely separate, discussions into conversation. One concerns the politics of land development that has emerged through the expanding use of regulatory land use tools oriented single-mindedly around the capture of monetary value from land. A second theme focuses on how the city’s urban future is produced through social and political contestation constrained by the valorization of land’s exchange value. Taking a longer and relational point of view, authors in this issue examine what is at work – politically, economically, fiscally, institutionally and ideologically – to enable land development and land value capture to become an increasingly used solution to fiscal revenue generation in communities around the world. This issue also fuels our imagination to consider how we might discuss social futures rooted in social values. There is no finality to the kind of present-future relationship that land value capture helps to shape. Value is an intentional choice and is performed, and if we take such a value concept as our starting point, then value practices hold the key to whether we can achieve a more socially desired or intended end.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi Shih & Kathe Newman, 2024. "Rethinking value in land and negotiating the city’s social future," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(6), pages 1731-1737, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:56:y:2024:i:6:p:1731-1737
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X241282796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X241282796
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X241282796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:56:y:2024:i:6:p:1731-1737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.