IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v56y2024i6p1731-1737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking value in land and negotiating the city’s social future

Author

Listed:
  • Mi Shih

    (Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA)

  • Kathe Newman

    (Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA)

Abstract

In a context of global competition for capital, austerity politics, municipal entrepreneurialism and financialization, land is increasingly seen as a source of money for fiscal revenue. Mechanisms of land value capture, as a consequence, have accelerated forces of land monetization and commodification in recent years. This special issue is a collective attempt to rethink the concept, practice and politics of value in land development. Seven authors bring two, still largely separate, discussions into conversation. One concerns the politics of land development that has emerged through the expanding use of regulatory land use tools oriented single-mindedly around the capture of monetary value from land. A second theme focuses on how the city’s urban future is produced through social and political contestation constrained by the valorization of land’s exchange value. Taking a longer and relational point of view, authors in this issue examine what is at work – politically, economically, fiscally, institutionally and ideologically – to enable land development and land value capture to become an increasingly used solution to fiscal revenue generation in communities around the world. This issue also fuels our imagination to consider how we might discuss social futures rooted in social values. There is no finality to the kind of present-future relationship that land value capture helps to shape. Value is an intentional choice and is performed, and if we take such a value concept as our starting point, then value practices hold the key to whether we can achieve a more socially desired or intended end.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi Shih & Kathe Newman, 2024. "Rethinking value in land and negotiating the city’s social future," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(6), pages 1731-1737, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:56:y:2024:i:6:p:1731-1737
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X241282796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X241282796
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X241282796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mi Shih & Leslie Shieh, 2020. "Negotiating Density and Financing Public Goods in Vancouver and New Taipei City: A Development Rights Perspective," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 380-395, July.
    2. Brett Christophers, 2014. "Wild Dragons in the City: Urban Political Economy, Affordable Housing Development and the Performative World-making of Economic Models," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 79-97, January.
    3. Ju Tjung Liong & Helga Leitner & Eric Sheppard & Suryono Herlambang & Wahyu Astuti, 2020. "Space Grabs: Colonizing the Vertical City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1072-1082, November.
    4. Robert W. Lake, 2022. "Yimbyism Then And Now," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 331-335, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mi Shih & Ying-Hui Chiang, 2024. "A politically less contested and financially more calculable urban future: Density techniques and heightened land commodification in Taiwan," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(6), pages 1753-1770, September.
    2. Rachel Bok, 2021. "Wayfinding in the Long Shadow of City Benchmarking: Or How to Manufacture (an Economy of) Comparability in the Global Urban," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 381-384, March.
    3. Iain White, 2020. "Rigour and rigour mortis? Planning, calculative rationality, and forces of stability and change," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2885-2900, November.
    4. Hanna Hilbrandt & Monika Grubbauer, 2020. "Standards and SSOs in the contested widening and deepening of financial markets: The arrival of Green Municipal Bonds in Mexico City," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1415-1433, October.
    5. Prathiwi Widyatmi Putri, 2024. "The political: A view from Jakarta’s kampungs," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(3), pages 979-987, May.
    6. Jennifer Robinson & Katia Attuyer, 2021. "Extracting Value, London Style: Revisiting the Role of the State in Urban Development," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 303-331, March.
    7. Asa Roast, 2024. "Towards weird verticality: The spectacle of vertical spaces in Chongqing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(4), pages 636-653, March.
    8. Andrew Harris & Tom Wolseley, 2024. "Vertical Horizons: Dealing with luxury urban skies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(4), pages 654-668, March.
    9. Rachel Weber, 2021. "Embedding futurity in urban governance: Redevelopment schemes and the time value of money," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(3), pages 503-524, May.
    10. Andre Sorensen, 2024. "Urban intensification and land value capture in Toronto: Conjunctural analysis, critical junctures, and developmental pathways in urban planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(6), pages 1803-1819, September.
    11. Quintin Bradley, 2021. "The financialisation of housing land supply in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(2), pages 389-404, February.
    12. Kah-Wee Lee, 2014. "Transforming Macau: Planning as Institutionalized Informality and the Spatial Dynamics of Hypercompetition," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2622-2637, November.
    13. Bouwmeester, Josje & Hartmann, Thomas & Ay, Deniz & Gerber, Jean-David, 2024. "Making room for affordable housing: Project-based negotiations between planning authorities and landowners in Dutch and Swiss densification," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    14. Mojgan Taheri Tafti, 2024. "Capturing planning: Politics of land based accumulation in Tehran," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(6), pages 1045-1063, September.
    15. Chris Foye, 2022. "Section 106, Viability, And The Depoliticization Of English Land Value Capture Policy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 269-286, March.
    16. Bosman Batubara & Guntoro & Noer Fauzi Rachman & Herlily & Joko Adianto, 2024. "Land Occupation, Re-occupation, and Housing Cooperative: Commune Formation by Jakarta’s Urban Poor," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 13(1), pages 89-109, March.
    17. Ihnji Jon, 2024. "Reassembling the politics of “Green†urban redevelopment in East Garfield Park: A Polanyian approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(4), pages 1005-1023, June.
    18. Siân Butcher, 2020. "Creating a gap that can be filled: Constructing and territorializing the affordable housing submarket in Gauteng, South Africa," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(1), pages 173-199, February.
    19. Anthonia Oluwatosin Adediran & Samuel-Soma Ajibade & Abdelhamid Zaidi & Faizah Mohammed Bashir & Emmanuel Falude & Yakubu Aminu Dodo & Muhammed Basheer Jasser, 2024. "A Science Mapping Analysis of Energy Efficiency and Affordable Housing Research," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 436-449, November.
    20. Patrick McAllister & Emma Street & Peter Wyatt, 2016. "Governing calculative practices: An investigation of development viability modelling in the English planning system," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(11), pages 2363-2379, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:56:y:2024:i:6:p:1731-1737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.