IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v49y2017i7p1684-1703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The strategic use of time-limited property rights in land-use planning: Evidence from Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-David Gerber
  • Stéphane Nahrath
  • Thomas Hartmann

Abstract

While land-use plans are regularly revised, property rights are extremely stable over time. Yet, the stability of property rights resulting from the current conception of exclusive ownership makes the implementation of land-use plans increasingly complicated, difficult and long. Planners recognized the need for more flexibility in many urban contexts to effectively steer spatial development in the already built environment. Relying on a detailed case study carried out in the municipality of Bienne, Switzerland, this paper examines how a strategic use of long-term ground leases granted on municipal land can allow for increased flexibility in planning. Ground leases are a policy instrument leading to a time-limited division of the bundle of rights between a public landowner and the ground lease holder, who becomes the owner of the facilities on the land for up to one hundred years. The strategic role of ground leases in urban planning remains largely unexplored. This article shows that ground leases are an empirical and practical response of planning authorities to the inflexibility of property rights in given situations where more flexibility would be needed. Public actors can use ground leases to implement an active land policy leading to a better allocation of land to specific projects and to a more precise control of building activity. By analyzing the role of ground leases at the interface between planning and property, this article aims to contribute to a better understanding of the complex relationship between land-use planning and property rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-David Gerber & Stéphane Nahrath & Thomas Hartmann, 2017. "The strategic use of time-limited property rights in land-use planning: Evidence from Switzerland," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(7), pages 1684-1703, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:49:y:2017:i:7:p:1684-1703
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X17701916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X17701916
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X17701916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Adams & Alan Disberry & Norman Hutchison & Thomas Munjoma, 2001. "Ownership Constraints to Brownfield Redevelopment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(3), pages 453-477, March.
    2. Jean-David Gerber & Adena R Rissman, 2012. "Land-Conservation Strategies: The Dynamic Relationship between Acquisition and Land-Use Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(8), pages 1836-1855, August.
    3. Vitnarae Kang & Willem K. Korthals Altes, 2015. "Flexibility and Public Accountability in Public Land Development Projects in Progress," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(8), pages 1609-1626, August.
    4. Steven C. Bourassa & Max Neutze & Ann Louise Strong, 1997. "Assessing betterment under a public premium leasehold system: principles and practice in Canberra," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 49-68, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gatot Sasongko & Ina Ariani Restiani Hunga & Ardhian Syah Noer Julana & Yustinus Wahyudi & Paulus Leliak & Andrian Dolfriandra Huruta, 2019. "Public policy for housing development: a case study on housing development in Semarang Regency - Indonesia," Post-Print hal-02342660, HAL.
    2. Gatot Sasongko & Ina Ariani Restiani Hunga & Ardhian Syah Noer Julana & Yustinus Wahyudi & Paulus Leliak & Andrian Dolfriandra Huruta, 2019. "Public policy for housing development: a case study on housing development in Semarang Regency - Indonesia," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 1(4), pages 280-300, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Woestenburg & Erwin van der Krabben & Tejo Spit, 2019. "Legitimacy Dilemmas in Direct Government Intervention: The Case of Public Land Development, an Example from the Netherlands," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Korthals Altes, Willem K., 2019. "Planning initiative: Promoting development by the use of options in Amsterdam," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 13-21.
    3. B Glumac & Q Han & W Schaefer, 2018. "A negotiation decision model for public–private partnerships in brownfield redevelopment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(1), pages 145-160, January.
    4. Cheung, K.S. & Wong, S.K. & Wu, H. & Yiu, C.Y., 2021. "The land governance cost on co-ownership: A study of the cross-lease in New Zealand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Puustinen, Tuulia & Krigsholm, Pauliina & Falkenbach, Heidi, 2022. "Land policy conflict profiles for different densification types: A literature-based approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    6. David Adams & Christopher De Sousa & Steven Tiesdell, 2010. "Brownfield Development: A Comparison of North American and British Approaches," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(1), pages 75-104, January.
    7. Vanessa R. Levesque & Aram J. K. Calhoun & Kathleen P. Bell, 2019. "Actions speak louder than words: designing transdisciplinary approaches to enact solutions," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9(2), pages 159-169, June.
    8. Lai, Yani & Tang, Bosin & Chen, Xiangsheng & Zheng, Xian, 2021. "Spatial determinants of land redevelopment in the urban renewal processes in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Ahmad, Naveed & Zhu, Yuming & Hongli, Lin & Karamat, Jawad & Waqas, Muhammad & Taskheer Mumtaz, Syed Muhammad, 2020. "Mapping the obstacles to brownfield redevelopment adoption in developing economies: Pakistani Perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. Alberto Longo & Danny Campbell, 2017. "The Determinants of Brownfields Redevelopment in England," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(2), pages 261-283, June.
    11. Chuan Yang & Mingfeng Li & Ziqi Wang, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis on Conservation Land Trust and Implication for China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Jiaxin Guo & Zhenqi Hu & Yusheng Liang, 2022. "Causes and Countermeasures for the Failure of Mining Land Use Policy Reform: Practice Analysis from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Yuting, Yang & Guanghui, Jiang & Qiuyue, Zheng & Dingyang, Zhou & Yuling, Li, 2019. "Does the land use structure change conform to the evolution law of industrial structure? An empirical study of Anhui Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 657-667.
    14. Antoine Paccoud & Markus Hesse & Tom Becker & Magdalena Górczyńska, 2022. "Land and the housing affordability crisis: landowner and developer strategies in Luxembourg’s facilitative planning context," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(10), pages 1782-1799, October.
    15. Sumaryanto & Sri Hery Susilowati & Fitri Nurfatriani & Herlina Tarigan & Erwidodo & Tahlim Sudaryanto & Henri Wira Perkasa, 2022. "Determinants of Farmers’ Behavior towards Land Conservation Practices in the Upper Citarum Watershed in West Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Nyuying Wang & Oleg Golubchikov & Wei Chen & Zhigao Liu, 2020. "The Hybrid Spatialities of Post-Industrial Beijing: Communism, Neoliberalism, and Brownfield Redevelopment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Jean-David Gerber & Adena R Rissman, 2012. "Land-Conservation Strategies: The Dynamic Relationship between Acquisition and Land-Use Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(8), pages 1836-1855, August.
    18. Valtonen, Eero & Falkenbach, Heidi & Viitanen, Kauko, 2018. "Securing public objectives in large-scale urban development: Comparison of public and private land development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 481-492.
    19. Elvia María Jiménez Zapata, 2016. "Participación en la Plusvalía: Instrumento Financiero Ligado al Desarrollo Urbanístico," Revista de Economía y Administración, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, December.
    20. John A. Gallo & Amanda T. Lombard & Richard M. Cowling & Randal Greene & Frank W. Davis, 2023. "Meeting Human and Biodiversity Needs for 30 × 30 and beyond with an Iterative Land Allocation Framework and Tool," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:49:y:2017:i:7:p:1684-1703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.