IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v46y2014i12p2816-2833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizenshit: The Right to Flush and the Urban Sanitation Imaginary

Author

Listed:
  • Margaret del Carmen Morales

    (Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T IZ4, Canada)

  • Leila Harris

    (Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, Institute for Gender, Race, Sexuality and Social Justice, University of British Columbia, 421-2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Gunilla Öberg

    (Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, 447-2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada)

Abstract

For many in the Global North, urban life means that your shit is not your problem. We postulate that a possible reason for the global sanitation failure in urban areas is a disconnect between sanitation expectations—what we term the urban sanitation imaginary —and the practices required by proposed sanitation solutions. The case study presented here is based on interviews with residents of Villa Lamadrid, a marginalized neighborhood in Buenos Aires, Argentina, which faces significant public health impacts from an inadequate sewage management system. We solicited feedback regarding specific sanitation technologies frequently prescribed for poor urban communities—among them a urine diversion dry toilet with dehydration vaults. Even as this system is posited as ‘sustainable’ for the context of Villa Lamadrid in terms of ecological and economic factors, conversations with residents revealed why this option might not be sustainable in terms of social expectations. On the basis of interviews with community members we have defined four aspects of residents' urban sanitation imaginaries that we consider highly relevant for any consideration of sanitation solutions in this context: (1) an urban citizen does not engage physically or mentally with their shit or its management; (2) an appropriate urban sanitation system requires flushing; (3) systems that require user's engagement with their shit and its management signify rural, underdeveloped, and backward lifestyles; and (4) urban sanitation is a state responsibility, not a local one. Highlighting the urban sanitation imaginary methodologically and analytically goes beyond a discussion of culturally and contextually appropriate technologies. It examines linkages between user expectations and notions of urban citizenship and modernity. Ultimately it also draws attention to the sociopolitical dynamics and environmental justice issues embedded in discussions of sanitation and hygiene. While some of our results are specific to the Villa Lamadrid context, our research more generally suggests the need to consider sanitation imaginaries to reframe the discussion on sanitation interventions, particularly in underserved and impoverished urban areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Margaret del Carmen Morales & Leila Harris & Gunilla Öberg, 2014. "Citizenshit: The Right to Flush and the Urban Sanitation Imaginary," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(12), pages 2816-2833, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:12:p:2816-2833
    DOI: 10.1068/a130331p
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a130331p
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a130331p?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. F. Ludwig & Kumar Mohit, 2000. "Appropriate technology for municipal sewerage/excreta management in developing countries, Thailand case study," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 215-219, September.
    2. Matthew Gandy, 2004. "Rethinking urban metabolism: water, space and the modern city," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 363-379, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Denise Silveti & Kim Andersson, 2019. "Challenges of Governing Off-Grid “Productive” Sanitation in Peri-Urban Areas: Comparison of Case Studies in Bolivia and South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-9, June.
    2. Kotsila, Panagiota & Saravanan, V. Subramanian, 2017. "Biopolitics Gone to Shit? State Narratives versus Everyday Realities of Water and Sanitation in the Mekong Delta," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 374-388.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanesa Castán Broto & Harriet Bulkeley, 2013. "Maintaining Climate Change Experiments: Urban Political Ecology and the Everyday Reconfiguration of Urban Infrastructure," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1934-1948, November.
    2. Chen, Shaoqing & Chen, Bin, 2017. "Coupling of carbon and energy flows in cities: A meta-analysis and nexus modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 774-783.
    3. Canoy, Nico A. & Robles, Augil Marie Q. & Roxas, Gilana Kim T., 2022. "Bodies-in-waiting as infrastructure: Assembling the Philippine Government's disciplinary quarantine response to COVID-19," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    4. Stanislav Shmelev & Harrison Roger Brook, 2021. "Macro Sustainability across Countries: Key Sector Environmentally Extended Input-Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-46, October.
    5. Lisa Björkman, 2014. "Becoming a Slum: From Municipal Colony to Illegal Settlement in Liberalization-Era Mumbai," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 36-59, January.
    6. Chihsin Chiu, 2020. "Theorizing Public Participation and Local Governance in Urban Resilience: Reflections on the “Provincializing Urban Political Ecology” Thesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    7. COLIN McFARLANE, 2008. "Governing the Contaminated City: Infrastructure and Sanitation in Colonial and Post‐Colonial Bombay," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 415-435, June.
    8. Muchaparara Musemwa, 2010. "From ‘Sunshine City’ to a Landscape of Disaster," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 26(2), pages 165-206, June.
    9. Melissa R. McHale & Steward T.A. Pickett & Olga Barbosa & David N. Bunn & Mary L. Cadenasso & Daniel L. Childers & Meredith Gartin & George R. Hess & David M. Iwaniec & Timon McPhearson & M. Nils Pete, 2015. "The New Global Urban Realm: Complex, Connected, Diffuse, and Diverse Social-Ecological Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-30, April.
    10. Chihsin Chiu, 2024. "Greening informality through metabolic coordination: An urban political ecology of governing extralegal housing forms in Taiwan," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 1127-1146, May.
    11. Ian R. Cook & Erik Swyngedouw, 2012. "Cities, Social Cohesion and the Environment: Towards a Future Research Agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1959-1979, July.
    12. Laura Tozer & Nicole Klenk, 2019. "Urban configurations of carbon neutrality: Insights from the Carbon Neutral Cities Alliance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(3), pages 539-557, May.
    13. Bruno Brentan & Silvia Carpitella & Daniel Barros & Gustavo Meirelles & Antonella Certa & Joaquín Izquierdo, 2021. "Water Quality Sensor Placement: A Multi-Objective and Multi-Criteria Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 225-241, January.
    14. Jonathan Silver, 2015. "Disrupted Infrastructures: An Urban Political Ecology of Interrupted Electricity in Accra," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 984-1003, September.
    15. Matthew Gandy, 2008. "Landscapes of Disaster: Water, Modernity, and Urban Fragmentation in Mumbai," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(1), pages 108-130, January.
    16. Wang, Yan, 2020. "Urban land and sustainable resource use: Unpacking the countervailing effects of urbanization on water use in China, 1990–2014," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. Viput Ongsakul & Salil K. Sen, 2019. "Low Carbon Energy Symbiosis for Sustainability: Review of Shared Value-based Policy Metabolism to Enhance the Implementability of the Sustainable Development Goals in Asia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 24-30.
    18. Ana Moragues-Faus & Bridin Carroll, 2018. "Reshaping urban political ecologies: an analysis of policy trajectories to deliver food security," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(6), pages 1337-1351, December.
    19. Bhandari, Pratik & Creighton, Douglas & Gong, Jinzhe & Boyle, Carol & Law, Kris M.Y., 2023. "Evolution of cyber-physical-human water systems: Challenges and gaps," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    20. Srivastwa, Amit Kumar & Kabra, Asmita, 2023. "Socio-spatial Infrastructures: Drinking Water Supply and Formation of Unequal Socio-technological Relations in Rural Southern Bihar," Ecology, Economy and Society - the INSEE Journal, Indian Society of Ecological Economics (INSEE), vol. 6(02), July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:12:p:2816-2833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.