IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v46y2014i11p2718-2734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing Peripheral Cross-Border Regions in Planning: Territory—Network Interplay in the Barents Region

Author

Listed:
  • Kaj Zimmerbauer

    (Department of Geography, PO Box 3000, Fi-90014 University of Oulu, Finland)

Abstract

This paper studies how supranational regions are built through the interplay of borders and networks. The focus is on how territory and network become manifest in planning, and in particular on the actual contexts in planning where the territorial discourse is emphasized. Conceptually, territory–network interplay is linked to recent discussions on relational/territorial space, multidimensionality of sociospatial relations, and thin and thick region building. The Barents Euro-Arctic Region is used here as an example, and the region's recent geoeconomic turn is studied first. The paper concludes that, despite geoeconomization, network is not dominant over territory as a key category in supranational region building. Although the contemporary (new) regionalist planning discourse emphasizes the institutionalization of network-oriented regional (economic) spaces without definitive boundaries, processes such as representing the region in branding or (re)defining who is eligible to join the official structures of cross-border cooperation entail a degree of territorial thinking and make use of the notions of boundedness and spatial symmetry. In planning practices networks commonly create the territory effect and vice versa. However, due to their different ontologies, network and territory can appear as separate or even contradictory discourses as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaj Zimmerbauer, 2014. "Constructing Peripheral Cross-Border Regions in Planning: Territory—Network Interplay in the Barents Region," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2718-2734, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:11:p:2718-2734
    DOI: 10.1068/a140001p
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a140001p
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a140001p?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patsy Healey, 2004. "The Treatment of Space and Place in the New Strategic Spatial Planning in Europe," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 45-67, March.
    2. repec:taf:regstd:v:47:y:2013:i1:p:18-28 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Mark Goodwin, 2013. "Regions, Territories and Relationality: Exploring the Regional Dimensions of Political Practice," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(8), pages 1181-1190, September.
    4. John Allen & Allan Cochrane, 2007. "Beyond the Territorial Fix: Regional Assemblages, Politics and Power," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1161-1175.
    5. Kaj Zimmerbauer, 2013. "Unusual Regionalism in Northern Europe: The Barents Region in the Making," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 89-103, January.
    6. John Harrison, 2013. "Configuring the New 'Regional World': On being Caught between Territory and Networks," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 55-74, January.
    7. Anssi Paasi, 2012. "Border Studies Reanimated: Going beyond the Territorial/Relational Divide," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(10), pages 2303-2309, October.
    8. Krisztina Varr� & Arnoud Lagendijk, 2013. "Conceptualizing the Region - In What Sense Relational?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 18-28, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Harrison & Anna Growe, 2014. "When Regions Collide: In What Sense a New ‘Regional Problem’?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(10), pages 2332-2352, October.
    2. Sabine Dörry & Olivier J Walther, 2015. "Contested ‘Relational Policy Spaces’ in Two European Border Regions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(2), pages 338-355, February.
    3. Allan Cochrane, 2012. "Making up a Region: The Rise and Fall of the ‘South East of England’ as a Political Territory," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 95-108, February.
    4. Laura De Leeuw & Martijn Groenleer, 2018. "The Regional Governance of Energy-Neutral Housing: Toward a Framework for Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Stephen Hincks & Iain Deas & Graham Haughton, 2017. "Real Geographies, Real Economies and Soft Spatial Imaginaries: Creating a ‘More than Manchester’ Region," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 642-657, July.
    6. Anssi Paasi & Kaj Zimmerbauer, 2016. "Penumbral borders and planning paradoxes: Relational thinking and the question of borders in spatial planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(1), pages 75-93, January.
    7. Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Xiaoling & Zheng, Xian, 2020. "Land use regulation and urban land value: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Máliková Lucia & Klobučník Michal, 2017. "Differences in the Rural Structure of Slovakia in the Context of Socio-Spatial Polarisation," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 125-140, June.
    9. Janet Newman, 2014. "Landscapes of antagonism: Local governance, neoliberalism and austerity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(15), pages 3290-3305, November.
    10. Stephen M McCauley & James T Murphy, 2013. "Smart Growth and the Scalar Politics of Land Management in the Greater Boston Region, Usa," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(12), pages 2852-2867, December.
    11. Melika Levelt & Leonie Janssen-Jansen, 2013. "The Amsterdam Metropolitan Area Challenge: Opportunities for Inclusive Coproduction in City-Region Governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 540-555, June.
    12. Jacob Salder, 2013. "Redeveloping local economic strategy for the post-regionalist era: A contextual benchmarking approach," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(7-8), pages 752-769, November.
    13. I-Chun Catherine Chang, 2017. "Failure matters: Reassembling eco-urbanism in a globalizing China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1719-1742, August.
    14. David Clelland, 2020. "Beyond the city region? Uneven governance and the evolution of regional economic development in Scotland," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(1), pages 7-26, February.
    15. Jennifer Robinson & Katia Attuyer, 2021. "Extracting Value, London Style: Revisiting the Role of the State in Urban Development," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 303-331, March.
    16. Roger Keil, 2011. "The Global City Comes Home," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2495-2517, September.
    17. Van den Hoek, Duncan & Spit, Tejo & Hartmann, Thomas, 2020. "Certain flexibilities in land-use plans Towards a method for assessing flexibility," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Pauline McGuirk & Robyn Dowling, 2021. "Urban governance dispositifs: cohering diverse ecologies of urban energy governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(4), pages 759-780, June.
    19. Xiaobo Su, 2014. "Multi-Scalar Regionalization, Network Connections and the Development of Yunnan Province, China," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(1), pages 91-104, January.
    20. Andrew E. G. Jonas & Andrew R. Goetz & Sutapa Bhattacharjee, 2014. "City-regionalism as a Politics of Collective Provision: Regional Transport Infrastructure in Denver, USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2444-2465, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:46:y:2014:i:11:p:2718-2734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.