IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v45y2013i1p109-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gentrification or ‘Multiplication of the Suburbs’? Residential Development in New Zealand's Coastal Countryside

Author

Listed:
  • Damian Collins

    (Human Geography Program, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada)

Abstract

This paper conceptualizes recent residential development in New Zealand's coastal countryside, which has entailed dramatic escalations in land and housing values. It considers whether this process should be understood as gentrification, as has recently been suggested. The argument against this interpretation is twofold. First, some qualities of coastal development that echo themes in the rural gentrification literature may be better understood as characteristics of a buoyant real estate market. Second, various central elements of rural gentrification are absent. These include restoration and reuse of the built environment, a shift in locational preferences prompting in-migration, and countercultural lifestyle opportunities. The process is also unlikely to cause significant direct displacement, as growth has proceeded in large part through greenfield new-build. An alternative, and long-standing, conceptualization of rural coastal development in New Zealand is as a type of suburbanization. The reproduction of suburban forms and functions is illustrated with reference to a case study from the Northland region. The paper emphasizes that definitions of gentrification need to be tailored so as not to capture any type of real estate-related investment and upgrading.

Suggested Citation

  • Damian Collins, 2013. "Gentrification or ‘Multiplication of the Suburbs’? Residential Development in New Zealand's Coastal Countryside," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(1), pages 109-125, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:45:y:2013:i:1:p:109-125
    DOI: 10.1068/a4571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a4571
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a4571?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary Bridge, 2001. "Estate Agents as Interpreters of Economic and Cultural Capital: The Gentrification Premium in the Sydney Housing Market," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 87-101, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antoine Paccoud, 2017. "Buy-to-let gentrification: Extending social change through tenure shifts," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(4), pages 839-856, April.
    2. Nilsson, Isabelle & Delmelle, Elizabeth C., 2023. "Smart growth as a luxury amenity? Exploring the relationship between the marketing of smart growth characteristics and neighborhood racial and income change," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    3. Susan J. Smith & Moira Munro & Hazel Christie, 2006. "Performing (Housing) Markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(1), pages 81-98, January.
    4. Andrew Gorman-Murray & Gordon Waitt, 2009. "Queer-Friendly Neighbourhoods: Interrogating Social Cohesion across Sexual Difference in Two Australian Neighbourhoods," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(12), pages 2855-2873, December.
    5. John Meligrana & Andrejs Skaburskis, 2005. "Extent, Location and Profiles of Continuing Gentrification in Canadian Metropolitan Areas, 1981-2001," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(9), pages 1569-1592, August.
    6. Mark Davidson & Loretta Lees, 2005. "New-Build ‘Gentrification’ and London's Riverside Renaissance," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(7), pages 1165-1190, July.
    7. Willem R Boterman, 2012. "Residential Mobility of Urban Middle Classes in the Field of Parenthood," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(10), pages 2397-2412, October.
    8. Matthew W. Rofe, 2003. "'I Want to be Global': Theorising the Gentrifying Class as an Emergent Elite Global Community," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(12), pages 2511-2526, November.
    9. Nathan Marom, 2014. "Relating a City's History and Geography with Bourdieu: One Hundred Years of Spatial Distinction in Tel Aviv," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1344-1362, July.
    10. Craig Young & Martina Diep & Stephanie Drabble, 2006. "Living with Difference? The 'Cosmopolitan City' and Urban Reimaging in Manchester, UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1687-1714, September.
    11. Andrew Riely, 2020. "Gentrifiers, distinction, and social preservation: A case study in consumption on Mount Pleasant Street in Washington, DC," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(12), pages 2383-2401, September.
    12. Gary Bridge, 2006. "Perspectives on Cultural Capital and the Neighbourhood," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(4), pages 719-730, April.
    13. Brian Doucet, 2014. "A Process of Change and a Changing Process: Introduction to the Special Issue on Contemporary Gentrification," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(2), pages 125-139, April.
    14. Andrea Pollio & Liam Magee & Ien Ang & David Rowe & Deborah Stevenson & Teresa Swist & Alexandra Wong, 2021. "SURVIVING SUPERGENTRIFICATION IN INNER CITY SYDNEY: Adaptive Spaces and Makeshift Economies of Cultural Production," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 778-794, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:45:y:2013:i:1:p:109-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.