IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v38y2006i3p533-551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Contested Strategies of Local Governance: Community Strategies, Development Plans, and Local Government Modernisation

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Tewdwr-Jones
  • Janice Morphet
  • Philip Allmendinger

    (Centre of Planning Studies, Department of Real Estate and Planning, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AW, England)

Abstract

The current round of local government modernisation in England, which commenced in 1997, has focused primarily on three main areas—new council constitutions, e-government, and performance. However, a fourth strand of initiatives relates to the power of well-being and the duty to prepare a community strategy, in partnership with a local strategic partnership. Academic commentators and planners, who have been focusing on the proposed UK planning reforms as contained within the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act (passed in 2004), have largely ignored the development of this strand. In this paper we explore these aspects of the local government modernisation agenda for planners and pull out some of the key issues for comparison in the ownership, role, and development of the new plans: community strategies and development plans. Opportunities and difficulties of ensuring that new development plans become the spatial expression of community strategies is assessed through an illustration of the relationship between the London Borough of Camden's community strategy and its unitary development plan. Following a review of the content of both documents, wider assessments are drawn out and we conclude by debating the implications of and challenges for a future reformed planning system at the local level.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Tewdwr-Jones & Janice Morphet & Philip Allmendinger, 2006. "The Contested Strategies of Local Governance: Community Strategies, Development Plans, and Local Government Modernisation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(3), pages 533-551, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:38:y:2006:i:3:p:533-551
    DOI: 10.1068/a37308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a37308
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a37308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordon MacLeod, 2001. "New Regionalism Reconsidered: Globalization and the Remaking of Political Economic Space," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 804-829, December.
    2. Rhys Jones & Mark Goodwin & Martin Jones & Glenn Simpson, 2004. "Devolution, State Personnel, and the Production of New Territories of Governance in the United Kingdom," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(1), pages 89-109, January.
    3. Philip Allmendinger, 2002. "Planning Under a Scottish Parliament: A Missed Opportunity?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 793-798, September.
    4. Neil Brenner, 2000. "The Urban Question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, Urban Theory and the Politics of scale," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 361-378, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew Kythreotis, 2010. "Local strategic partnerships: a panacea for voluntary interest groups to promote local environmental sustainability? The UK context," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(4), pages 187-193.
    2. Petra H Roodbol-Mekkes & Adri van den Brink, 2015. "Rescaling Spatial Planning: Spatial Planning Reforms in Denmark, England, and the Netherlands," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(1), pages 184-198, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip Allmendinger & Graham Haughton, 2007. "The Fluid Scales and Scope of UK Spatial Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(6), pages 1478-1496, June.
    2. Calvin King Lam Chung & Jiang Xu, 2016. "Scale as both material and discursive: A view through China’s rescaling of urban planning system for environmental governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1404-1424, December.
    3. Andreas Öjehag-Pettersson, 2024. "Making space for competition: The rationalities of contemporary regional development," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(2), pages 198-214, March.
    4. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    5. Sedlacek Sabine & Kurka Bernhard & Maier Gunther, 2009. "Regional identity: a key to overcome structural weaknesses in peripheral rural regions?," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 1(4), pages 180-201, January.
    6. Zhen Yang & Jun Lei & Jian-Gang Li, 2019. "Identifying the Determinants of Urbanization in Prefecture-Level Cities in China: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Spatial Production Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Jacob Salder, 2020. "Spaces of regional governance: A periodisation approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(6), pages 1036-1054, September.
    8. Christian Lamour, 2022. "A RADICAL‐RIGHT POPULIST DEFINITION OF CROSS‐NATIONAL REGIONALISM IN EUROPE: Shaping Power Geometries at the Regional Scale Beyond State Borders," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 8-25, January.
    9. Yeung, Henry Wai-chung & Liu, Weidong & Dicken, Peter, 2006. "Transnational corporations and network effects of a local manufacturing cluster in mobile telecommunications equipment in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 520-540, March.
    10. Denis Frydrych & Tony Kinder, 2015. "How New Is Crowdfunding? The Venture Capital Evolution without Revolution – Discourse on Risk Capital Themes and their Relevance to Poland (Jak nowe jest zjawisko finansowana spolecznosciowego? Ewoluc," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 13(56), pages 177-194.
    11. Michael C. Shone & P. Ali Memon, 2008. "Tourism, Public Policy and Regional Development: A Turn from Neo-liberalism to the New Regionalism," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 23(4), pages 290-304, November.
    12. Tassilo Herrschel, 2013. "Competitiveness AND Sustainability: Can ‘Smart City Regionalism’ Square the Circle?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(11), pages 2332-2348, August.
    13. Eugene J. McCann, 2004. "Urban Political Economy Beyond the 'Global City'," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(12), pages 2315-2333, November.
    14. Jill Wigle, 2010. "Social Relations, Property and ‘Peripheral’ Informal Settlement: The Case of Ampliación San Marcos, Mexico City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(2), pages 411-436, February.
    15. Enrico Gualini & Carola Fricke, 2019. "‘Who governs’ Berlin’s metropolitan region? The strategic-relational construction of metropolitan scale in Berlin–Brandenburg’s economic development policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(1), pages 59-80, February.
    16. Pauline M McGuirk, 2004. "State, Strategy, and Scale in the Competitive City: A Neo-Gramscian Analysis of the Governance of ‘Global Sydney’," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(6), pages 1019-1043, June.
    17. Jiang Xu, 2016. "Environmental discourses in China’s urban planning system: A scaled discourse-analytical perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(5), pages 978-999, April.
    18. Robert Huggins & Nick Clifton, 2011. "Competitiveness, Creativity, and Place-Based Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(6), pages 1341-1362, June.
    19. Gene Desfor & Lucian Vesalon, 2008. "Urban Expansion and Industrial Nature: A Political Ecology of Toronto's Port Industrial District," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 586-603, September.
    20. Tsu-Lung Chou, 2007. "The Science Park and the Governance Challenge of the Movement of the High-Tech Urban Region towards Polycentricity: The Hsinchu Science-Based Industrial Park," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(6), pages 1382-1402, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:38:y:2006:i:3:p:533-551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.