IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v37y2005i9p1651-1668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redundancy, Readjustment, and Employability: What Can We Learn from the 2000 Harland & Wolff Redundancy?

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Shuttleworth

    (School of Geography, Queen's University, 19 Silver Street, Belfast BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland)

  • Peter Tyler

    (Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, 19 Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EP, England)

  • Darren McKinstry

    (Equality House, 7 - 9 Shaftesbury Square, Belfast BT2 7DP, Northern Ireland)

Abstract

Large-scale redundancies have been a common feature of the UK industrial landscape in recent years and a changing labour market and institutional context supports the need for ongoing research into this important area. In this paper the authors examine the postredundancy experience of workers who were made redundant from Harland & Wolff in Belfast in 2000 to identify the factors that affected the employability of those workers and to consider some aspects of state intervention. These workers might be regarded as being potentially disadvantaged with high risks of long-term unemployment and so provide a stiff test for policies for successful postredundancy transitions into the new economy with its demands for employability and flexibility. Employability is usually associated with supply-side measures, but the role of labour demand also needs to be explored, and the adjustment process is thus considered against the background of overall labour-market change that has occurred in Northern Ireland in recent years. The authors suggest that state intervention through the provision of job-related training can be a successful response to redundancy but that general skills training is questionable because of low uptake and perceptions of irrelevance. Job-specific training was not sufficient on its own to explain the relatively high rates of reemployment in this case. The presence of a group of engineering employers provided both the conditions for job-related training and then the vacancies for the redundant workers to fill. In debates about employability it is important that the demand-side of the labour market should receive sufficient attention. The authors also suggest that there are wider merits in taking a geographical approach to labour-market policy even if only restricted to the supply side. They suggest that employability should be developed in ways specific to local conditions and groups of workers. The differences in the characteristics of the workers who followed different postredundancy paths led to the conclusion that interventions could be precisely targeted to clearly defined groups of workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Shuttleworth & Peter Tyler & Darren McKinstry, 2005. "Redundancy, Readjustment, and Employability: What Can We Learn from the 2000 Harland & Wolff Redundancy?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(9), pages 1651-1668, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:37:y:2005:i:9:p:1651-1668
    DOI: 10.1068/a37250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a37250
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a37250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Adams & Malcolm Greig & Ronald W. McQuaid, 2002. "Mismatch in Local Labour Markets in Central Scotland: The Neglected Role of Demand," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1399-1416, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ian Shuttleworth & Anne Green, 2011. "Spatial Mobility Intentions, the Labour Market and Incapacity Benefit Claimants," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(5), pages 911-927, April.
    2. David Bailey & Caroline Chapain & Alex de Ruyter, 2012. "Employment Outcomes and Plant Closure in a Post-industrial City: An Analysis of the Labour Market Status of MG Rover Workers Three Years On," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(7), pages 1595-1612, May.
    3. Andrea Filippetti & Frederick Guy & Simona Iammarino, 2015. "Does training help in times of crisis? Training in employment in Northern and Southern Italy," Working Papers 28, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Dec 2015.
    4. Emelie Hane-Weijman & Rikard H. Eriksson & Martin Henning, 2018. "Returning to work: regional determinants of re-employment after major redundancies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(6), pages 768-780, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Spoonley, 2008. "Utilising a Demand-led Approach in a Local Labour Market," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 23(1), pages 19-30, February.
    2. Mangan, John & Trendle, Bernard, 2017. "Hard-to-fill vacancies: An analysis of demand side responses in the Australian state of Queensland," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 49-56.
    3. David Devins & Terence Hogarth, 2005. "Employing the Unemployed: Some Case Study Evidence on the Role and Practice of Employers," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(2), pages 245-256, February.
    4. M. J. Andrews & S. Bradley & D. Stott & R. Upward, 2008. "Successful Employer Search? An Empirical Analysis of Vacancy Duration Using Micro Data," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 75(299), pages 455-480, August.
    5. Greig, Malcolm Stewart & Lindsay, Colin & McQuaid, Ronald W., 2002. "Delivering job search services in rural labour markets: the role of ICT," ERSA conference papers ersa02p235, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Ronald W. McQuaid & Colin Lindsay, 2005. "The Concept of Employability," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(2), pages 197-219, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:37:y:2005:i:9:p:1651-1668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.