IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v36y2004i9p1673-1686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Choice of Park and Ride Facilities: An Analysis Using a Context-Dependent Hierarchical Choice Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Ilona D M Bos

    (Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Department of Transport Policy and Logistics Organization, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

  • Rob E C M Van der Heijden

    (Nijmegen School of Management, Human Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

  • Eric J E Molin

    (Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Department of Transport Policy and Logistics Organization, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

  • Harry J P Timmermans

    (Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, Urban Planning, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Park and ride (P&R) facilities have been proposed in several countries to alleviate the accessibility problems in cities. Despite growing accessibility problems, these facilities do not seem to attract the expected number of car drivers and are underused. In an attempt to measure consumer evaluations of the attributes of P&R facilities, a stated choice experiment, based on the method of hierarchical information integration, was conducted in the city of Nijmegen, The Netherlands. This paper documents the major results of this study, which differs from previous research in that a large range of attributes is examined, including accessibility of the facility, the quality of the facility, and the features of connecting transport. In addition, context variables affect the decisionmaking process of car drivers such as weather, having heavy luggage and travel purpose were incorporated in the study design. The results indicate that social safety, quality of the connecting public transport and relative travel times by transport modes are key attributes to the success of P&R facilities. Contextual variables seem to have only a minor impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilona D M Bos & Rob E C M Van der Heijden & Eric J E Molin & Harry J P Timmermans, 2004. "The Choice of Park and Ride Facilities: An Analysis Using a Context-Dependent Hierarchical Choice Experiment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(9), pages 1673-1686, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:36:y:2004:i:9:p:1673-1686
    DOI: 10.1068/a36138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a36138
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a36138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi Ibrahim & Muhamad Nazri Borhan & Riza Atiq O.K. Rahmat, 2020. "Understanding Users’ Intention to Use Park-and-Ride Facilities in Malaysia: The Role of Trust as a Novel Construct in the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Geržinič, Nejc & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Cats, Oded & Lancsar, Emily & Chorus, Caspar, 2021. "Estimating decision rule differences between ‘best’ and ‘worst’ choices in a sequential best worst discrete choice experiment," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    3. Sanmay Shelat & Thijs van de Wiel & Eric Molin & J W C van Lint & Oded Cats, 2022. "Analysing the impact of COVID-19 risk perceptions on route choice behaviour in train networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Cascetta, Ennio & Cartenì, Armando, 2014. "The hedonic value of railways terminals. A quantitative analysis of the impact of stations quality on travellers behaviour," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 41-52.
    5. Kimpton, Anthony & Pojani, Dorina & Sipe, Neil & Corcoran, Jonathan, 2020. "Parking Behavior: Park ‘n’ Ride (PnR) to encourage multimodalism in Brisbane," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Zhao, Xinwei & Chen, Peng & Jiao, Junfeng & Chen, Xiaohong & Bischak, Chris, 2019. "How does ‘park and ride’ perform? An evaluation using longitudinal data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 15-23.
    7. Bibhuti Sharma & Mark Hickman & Neema Nassir, 2019. "Park-and-ride lot choice model using random utility maximization and random regret minimization," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 217-232, February.
    8. Irfan Ahmed Memon & Saima Kalwar & Noman Sahito & Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Imtiaz Ahmed Chandio & Madzlan Napiah & Hasan Tayyeb, 2021. "Mode Choice Modeling to Shift Car Travelers towards Park and Ride Service in the City Centre of Karachi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Arentze, Theo A. & Molin, Eric J.E., 2013. "Travelers’ preferences in multimodal networks: Design and results of a comprehensive series of choice experiments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 15-28.
    10. Liao, Feixiong & Tian, Qiong & Arentze, Theo & Huang, Hai-Jun & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2020. "Travel preferences of multimodal transport systems in emerging markets: The case of Beijing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 250-266.
    11. Yan, Xiang & Levine, Jonathan & Marans, Robert, 2019. "The effectiveness of parking policies to reduce parking demand pressure and car use," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 41-50.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:36:y:2004:i:9:p:1673-1686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.