IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v32y2000i3p489-506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Politics of Communication between Planning Officers and Politicians: The Exercise of Power through Discourse

Author

Listed:
  • Malcolm Tait
  • Heather Campbell

Abstract

The relationship between local government officers and elected members is central to the decisionmaking processes associated with planning, as with many other areas of public policymaking. Legal responsibilities and issues of accountability and legitimacy lie at the heart of the relationship between officers and members, with interaction mediated and constituted through ritualised communicative encounters such as committee meetings and associated reports, and less formally through ad hoc contacts. Given the importance of this relationship it is striking that there has been relatively little research into the influences on officers and members within everyday planning practice. In this paper we will explore the extent to which a consideration of the language used in planning practice can inform our understanding of the relationship between planners and politicians. Thinking within the planning field about the role of language as a mechanism for reflecting and constituting power has been dominated by the work of Jürgen Habermas and Michel Foucault. However, despite the increasing attention focused on the importance of language and communication, work within the planning community has tended to concentrate on normative issues of how planning ought to operate in society rather than situating these theories within the ‘real’ world of practice. The objectives behind the case study research evaluated in this paper are therefore twofold. First, to explore the role of language and discourse in reflecting and constituting relations of power in a planning authority on the south coast of England and, second, to explore the value of Foucault's and Habermas's ideas as tools of research in planning. On the basis of this study we conclude that there are some important theoretical and methodological difficulties in connecting the ideas of Habermas and Foucault to the world of everyday planning practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Malcolm Tait & Heather Campbell, 2000. "The Politics of Communication between Planning Officers and Politicians: The Exercise of Power through Discourse," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(3), pages 489-506, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:32:y:2000:i:3:p:489-506
    DOI: 10.1068/a3287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a3287
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a3287?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annette Hastings, 1999. "Discourse and Urban Change: Introduction to the Special Issue," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 7-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karen Bickerstaff & Gordon Walker, 2005. "Shared Visions, Unholy Alliances: Power, Governance and Deliberative Processes in Local Transport Planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(12), pages 2123-2144, November.
    2. Sandeep Kumar & Varkki George Pallathucheril, 2004. "Analyzing Planning and Design Discourses," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 31(6), pages 829-846, December.
    3. Andy Inch, 2012. "Creating ‘a Generation of NIMBYs’? Interpreting the Role of the State in Managing the Politics of Urban Development," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(3), pages 520-535, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruce Taylor & Tabatha Wallington & Sonja Heyenga & Ben Harman, 2014. "Urban Growth and Climate Adaptation in Australia: Divergent Discourses and Implications for Policy-making," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(1), pages 3-21, January.
    2. John Sturzaker, 2010. "The Exercise of Power to Limit the Development of New Housing in the English Countryside," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(4), pages 1001-1016, April.
    3. Ruth Fincher, 2007. "Is High-rise Housing Innovative? Developers' Contradictory Narratives of High-rise Housing in Melbourne," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(3), pages 631-649, March.
    4. Geraint Ellis, 2004. "Discourses of Objection: Towards an Understanding of Third-Party Rights in Planning," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(9), pages 1549-1570, September.
    5. Nick Bailey, 2008. "The Challenge and Response to Global Tourism in the Post-modern Era: The Commodification, Reconfiguration and Mutual Transformation of Habana Vieja, Cuba," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1079-1096, May.
    6. Julie Cupples & Victoria Guyatt & Jamie Pearce, 2007. "“Put on a Jacket, You Wuss†: Cultural Identities, Home Heating, and Air Pollution in Christchurch, New Zealand," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(12), pages 2883-2898, December.
    7. Chik Collins, 2000. "Developing the Linguistic Turn in Urban Studies: Language, Context and Political Economy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(11), pages 2027-2043, October.
    8. Jiang Xu, 2016. "Environmental discourses in China’s urban planning system: A scaled discourse-analytical perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(5), pages 978-999, April.
    9. Kevin Fox Gotham, 2002. "Marketing Mardi Gras: Commodification, Spectacle and the Political Economy of Tourism in New Orleans," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(10), pages 1735-1756, September.
    10. Fazito, Mozart & Scott, Mark & Russell, Paula, 2016. "The dynamics of tourism discourses and policy in Brazil," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-17.
    11. Thomas Buhler & Virginie Lethier, 2020. "Analysing urban policy discourses using textometry: An application to French urban transport plans (2000–2015)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(10), pages 2181-2197, August.
    12. Juval Portugali & Nurit Alfasi, 2008. "An Approach to Planning Discourse Analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(2), pages 251-272, February.
    13. Nicole Gurran & Kristian Ruming, 2016. "Less planning, more development? Housing and urban reform discourses in Australia," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 262-280, July.
    14. Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich & Fischer, Wolfgang & Venghaus, Sandra & Weckenbrock, Christoph, 2015. "The German Energiewende – History and status quo," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 532-546.
    15. Keith Jacobs, 2004. "Waterfront Redevelopment: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Policy-making Process within the Chatham Maritime Project," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(4), pages 817-832, April.
    16. Masahide Horita, 2000. "Mapping Policy Discourse with CRANES: Spatial Understanding Support Systems as a Medium for Community Conflict Resolution," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 27(6), pages 801-814, December.
    17. Jean Hillier & Michael Gunder, 2005. "Not over Your Dead Bodies! A Lacanian Interpretation of Urban Planning Discourse and Practice," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(6), pages 1049-1066, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:32:y:2000:i:3:p:489-506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.