IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v24y1992i12p1711-1730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrial Policy of the European Community: Strategic Deficits and Regional Dilemmas

Author

Listed:
  • D Sadler

    (Department of Geography, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, England)

Abstract

Industrial policy of the European Community (EC) shifted in emphasis towards a neoliberal approach in the late 1980s as one part of moves towards completion of the single internal market by 1992. Intervention by national governments was also to be curtailed (in theory at least) on the grounds that it would be contrary to fair competition and free trade. There is mounting evidence, however, that European industry is increasingly falling behind its main rivals based in the USA and Japan. This poses a sharp challenge for the future of companies in certain key sectors, and for the places and regions dependent on employment in those industries. These issues of industrial strategy and regional development are explored in this paper. First, the change which took place in EC industrial policy from the limited but deliberately interventionist stance of the early 1980s to a much more strongly market-led approach by the early 1990s is outlined. The implications of such free-market measures for the energy sector, in terms of security-of-supply considerations are identified, and these measures are compared with the difficulty experienced in formulating a response to the challenge of global competition in another key sector, automobile production. The uneven regional impacts of such changes are then considered, and the inadequacy, even in its own terms, of present EC regional policy is indicated. Finally, the emergent strategic deficit in EC industrial policy, the regional dilemma associated with the ‘1992’ proposals, and the potential scope for alternative policy directions are addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • D Sadler, 1992. "Industrial Policy of the European Community: Strategic Deficits and Regional Dilemmas," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(12), pages 1711-1730, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:24:y:1992:i:12:p:1711-1730
    DOI: 10.1068/a241711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a241711
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a241711?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reich, Simon, 1989. "Roads to follow: regulating direct foreign investment," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 543-584, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francis Ostermeijer & Hans R A Koster & Jos van Ommeren & Victor Mayland Nielsen, 2022. "Automobiles and urban density [Urban spatial structure]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(5), pages 1073-1095.
    2. D Sadler, 1992. "Beyond ‘1992’: The Evolution of European Community Policies towards the Automobile Industry," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 10(2), pages 229-248, June.
    3. Herman Mark Schwartz, 2022. "The European Union, the United States, and Trade: Metaphorical Climate Change, Not Bad Weather," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 186-197.
    4. Linsi, Lukas, 2019. "The discourse of competitiveness and the dis-embedding of the national economy," SocArXiv s4j6y, Center for Open Science.
    5. P Dicken, 1992. "Europe 1992 and Strategic Change in the International Automobile Industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(1), pages 11-31, January.
    6. Anastasia Ufimtseva, 2020. "The Rise of Foreign Direct Investment Regulation in Investment‐recipient Countries," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(2), pages 222-232, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:24:y:1992:i:12:p:1711-1730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.