IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v19y1987i10p1359-1373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Study of the Competing Destinations Model Using Japanese Interaction Data

Author

Listed:
  • Y Ishikawa

    (Department of Geography, Osaka City University, Osaka 558, Japan)

Abstract

The misspecification issue, that the estimated distance parameter in spatial-interaction models might be biased by the spatial structure under investigation, has remained unsettled. However, the competing destinations model recently developed by Fotheringham is the first ray of hope for a solution. In this paper, the empirical validity of Fotheringham's model is examined using data of migration and of university enrollment among Japanese prefectures. It becomes clear that the origin-specific estimates of the distance-decay parameter, calibrated from the production-constrained model, are, on the whole, less negatively biased. It is also confirmed that the dominance of the agglomeration effect for one set of data, and of the competition effect for other sets of data, are the sources of the misspecification issue. The empirical implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Y Ishikawa, 1987. "An Empirical Study of the Competing Destinations Model Using Japanese Interaction Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 19(10), pages 1359-1373, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:19:y:1987:i:10:p:1359-1373
    DOI: 10.1068/a191359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a191359
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a191359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R J Bennett & R P Haining & A G Wilson, 1985. "Spatial Structure, Spatial Interaction, and Their Integration: A Review of Alternative Models," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 17(5), pages 625-645, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean-Michel Guldmann, 1998. "Competing destinations and intervening opportunities interaction models of inter-city telecommunication flows," ERSA conference papers ersa98p120, European Regional Science Association.
    2. António Caleiro & Conceição Rego, 2004. "Universities and economically depressed regions: how ‘attractive’ is the University of Évora?," ERSA conference papers ersa04p23, European Regional Science Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. P Plummer & R Haining & E Sheppard, 1998. "Spatial Pricing in Interdependent Markets: Testing Assumptions and Modeling Price Variation. A Case Study of Gasoline Retailing in St Cloud, Minnesota," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 30(1), pages 67-84, January.
    2. P Plummer, 1996. "Competitive Dynamics in Hierarchically Organized Markets: Spatial Duopoly and Demand Asymmetries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(11), pages 2021-2040, November.
    3. P B Slater, 1989. "A Field Theory of Spatial Interaction," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 21(1), pages 121-126, January.
    4. Katherine Curtis & Elizabeth Fussell & Jack DeWaard, 2015. "Recovery Migration After Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Spatial Concentration and Intensification in the Migration System," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(4), pages 1269-1293, August.
    5. David Gray, 2005. "An examination of regional interaction and super-regions in Britain: An error correction model approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 619-632.
    6. S Brown, 1992. "The Wheel of Retail Gravitation?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(10), pages 1409-1429, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:19:y:1987:i:10:p:1359-1373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.