IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v7y1996i4p365-375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Pressure in the Formation of Scientific Consensus

Author

Listed:
  • Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen

Abstract

Neither scientists nor the green lobby alone have driven the climate change story. A whole range of 'political actors', ranging from energy interests to international bureaucracies, has been involved. All found appeals to 'science' useful. This has created serious difficulties for scientific research where the pressure to create consensus must be replaced by the freedom to argue and debate, to test different theories and empirical sources. For the sake of both science and policy, therefore, the greenhouse debate 'must stay on the boil' a bit longer, with scientists and their environmental camp followers treating the rest of us as grown-ups. They need to air their arguments, not just hand our conclusions and prescriptions. It is most unlikely that the debate will be resolved in the short run by science. Science will remain a servant of politics, and should therefore take great care in what it offers and how it responds to opportunities. Short-termism may not only be the fate of politicians.

Suggested Citation

  • Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, 1996. "Political Pressure in the Formation of Scientific Consensus," Energy & Environment, , vol. 7(4), pages 365-375, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:7:y:1996:i:4:p:365-375
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X9600700406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X9600700406
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X9600700406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boehmer-Christiansen, Sonja, 1997. "A winning coalition of advocacy: climate research, bureaucracy and `alternative' fuels : Who is driving climate change policy?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 439-444, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:7:y:1996:i:4:p:365-375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.