IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v25y1997i4p439-444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A winning coalition of advocacy: climate research, bureaucracy and `alternative' fuels : Who is driving climate change policy?

Author

Listed:
  • Boehmer-Christiansen, Sonja

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Boehmer-Christiansen, Sonja, 1997. "A winning coalition of advocacy: climate research, bureaucracy and `alternative' fuels : Who is driving climate change policy?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 439-444, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:25:y:1997:i:4:p:439-444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-4215(97)00016-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, 1996. "Political Pressure in the Formation of Scientific Consensus," Energy & Environment, , vol. 7(4), pages 365-375, December.
    2. Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, 1993. "Scientific Consensus and Climate Change: The Codification of a Global Research Agenda," Energy & Environment, , vol. 4(4), pages 362-407, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hughes, Llewelyn & Meckling, Jonas, 2017. "The politics of renewable energy trade: The US-China solar dispute," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 256-262.
    2. Andreas Bjurström & Merritt Polk, 2011. "Physical and economic bias in climate change research: a scientometric study of IPCC Third Assessment Report," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:25:y:1997:i:4:p:439-444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.