IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v32y2021i6p1002-1028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current status of global warming potential reduction by cleaner composting

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Liu
  • Sanjeev K Awasthi
  • Yumin Duan
  • Ashok Pandey
  • Zengqiang Zhang
  • Mukesh K Awasthi

Abstract

The global living standards are currently undergoing a stage of growth; however, such improvement also brings some challenges. Global warming is the greatest threat to all living things and attracts more and more attention on a global scale due to the rapid development of economy. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) are the common components of greenhouse gases, which contribute to the global warming. Mitigation technologies for these gas emissions are urgently needed in every industry for the aim of cleaner production. Traditional agriculture also contributes significantly to enhance the greenhouse gases emission. Composting is a novel and economic greenhouse gases mitigation strategy compared to other technologies in terms of the organic waste disposal. Some of the European countries showed an increase of more than 50% in the composting rate. The microbial respiration, nitrification and denitrification processes, and the generation of anaerobic condition makes the emission of greenhouse gases inevitable during composting. However, although there have been a lot of papers that focused on the reduction of greenhouse gases emission in composting, none of these has summarized the methods of reducing the emission of greenhouse gases during the composting. This review discusses the benefit of composting in greenhouse gases mitigation in the organic waste management and the current methods to improve mitigation efficiency during cleaner composting. Key physical, chemical, and biological parameters related to greenhouse gases mitigation strategies were precisely studied to give a deep understanding about the emission of greenhouse gases during cleaner composting. Furthermore, the mechanism of greenhouse gases emission mitigation strategies for cleaner composting based on various external measures would be helpful for the exploration of novel and effective mitigation strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Liu & Sanjeev K Awasthi & Yumin Duan & Ashok Pandey & Zengqiang Zhang & Mukesh K Awasthi, 2021. "Current status of global warming potential reduction by cleaner composting," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(6), pages 1002-1028, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:32:y:2021:i:6:p:1002-1028
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X19882417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X19882417
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X19882417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.
    2. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Wang, Quan & Chen, Hongyu & Wang, Meijing & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Ren, Xiuna & Cai, Hanzhen & Li, Ronghua & Zhang, Zengqiang, 2018. "In-vessel co-composting of biosolid: Focusing on mitigation of greenhouse gases emissions and nutrients conservation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 814-823.
    3. Mohammad, Noor & Alam, Md. Zahangir & Kabbashi, Nassereldeen A. & Ahsan, Amimul, 2012. "Effective composting of oil palm industrial waste by filamentous fungi: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 69-78.
    4. Wang, Hanxi & Xu, Jianling & Yu, Haixia & Liu, Xuejun & Yin, Wei & Liu, Yuanyuan & Liu, Zhongwei & Zhang, Tian, 2015. "Study of the application and methods for the comprehensive treatment of municipal solid waste in northeastern China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1881-1889.
    5. S K Narendranathan & K Sudhagar & R Karthikeyan, 2019. "Optimization of engine operating parameters suitable for punnai oil application in CI engine using Grey relational method," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(4), pages 732-751, June.
    6. Jain, Siddharth & Jain, Shivani & Wolf, Ingo Tim & Lee, Jonathan & Tong, Yen Wah, 2015. "A comprehensive review on operating parameters and different pretreatment methodologies for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 142-154.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Liu, Tao & Zhang, Zengqiang & Kim, Sang-Hyoun & Pandey, Ashok, 2020. "Effect of biochar on emission, maturity and bacterial dynamics during sheep manure compositing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 421-429.
    2. Singh, Deval & Tembhare, Mamta & Machhirake, Nitesh & Kumar, Sunil, 2023. "Biogas generation potential of discarded food waste residue from ultra-processing activities at food manufacturing and packaging industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    3. Wang, Hanxi & Xu, Jianling & Sheng, Lianxi, 2019. "Study on the comprehensive utilization of city kitchen waste as a resource in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 263-277.
    4. Mónica Duque-Acevedo & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & Natalia Yakovleva & Francisco Camacho-Ferre, 2020. "Analysis of the Circular Economic Production Models and Their Approach in Agriculture and Agricultural Waste Biomass Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-32, December.
    5. Li, Chao & Sun, Yifan & Yi, Zijun & Zhang, Lijun & Zhang, Shu & Hu, Xun, 2022. "Co-pyrolysis of coke bottle wastes with cellulose, lignin and sawdust: Impacts of the mixed feedstock on char properties," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1126-1139.
    6. Maurizio Bressan & Elena Campagnoli & Carlo Giovanni Ferro & Valter Giaretto, 2023. "A Mass Balance-Based Method for the Anaerobic Digestion of Rice Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Zabed, Hossain M. & Akter, Suely & Yun, Junhua & Zhang, Guoyan & Zhang, Yufei & Qi, Xianghui, 2020. "Biogas from microalgae: Technologies, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    8. Qing Yin & Muhan Yu & Xueliang Ma & Ying Liu & Xunzhi Yin, 2023. "The Role of Straw Materials in Energy-Efficient Buildings: Current Perspectives and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-24, April.
    9. Nour El Houda Chaher & Mehrez Chakchouk & Nils Engler & Abdallah Nassour & Michael Nelles & Moktar Hamdi, 2020. "Optimization of Food Waste and Biochar In-Vessel Co-Composting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Kumar, Atul & Samadder, S.R., 2020. "Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    11. Anand, Abhijeet & Kumar, Vivek & Kaushal, Priyanka, 2022. "Biochar and its twin benefits: Crop residue management and climate change mitigation in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Wu, Di & Li, Lei & Peng, Yun & Yang, Pingjin & Peng, Xuya & Sun, Yongming & Wang, Xiaoming, 2021. "State indicators of anaerobic digestion: A critical review on process monitoring and diagnosis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    13. O'Connor, S. & Ehimen, E. & Pillai, S.C. & Black, A. & Tormey, D. & Bartlett, J., 2021. "Biogas production from small-scale anaerobic digestion plants on European farms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    14. Shen, Weiguo & Liu, Yi & Yan, Bilan & Wang, Jing & He, Pengtao & Zhou, Congcong & Huo, Xujia & Zhang, Wuzong & Xu, Gelong & Ding, Qingjun, 2017. "Cement industry of China: Driving force, environment impact and sustainable development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 618-628.
    15. Zamri, M.F.M.A. & Hasmady, Saiful & Akhiar, Afifi & Ideris, Fazril & Shamsuddin, A.H. & Mofijur, M. & Fattah, I. M. Rizwanul & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2021. "A comprehensive review on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Cheng, F. & Brewer, C.E., 2021. "Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    17. Anyaoku, Chukwunonso Chinedu & Baroutian, Saeid, 2018. "Decentralized anaerobic digestion systems for increased utilization of biogas from municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 982-991.
    18. Kumar, A. Naresh & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Masek, Ondrej & Priya, Anshu & Ki Lin, Carol Sze & Ok, Yong Sik & Kim, Sang-Hyoun, 2021. "Recent trends in biochar integration with anaerobic fermentation: Win-win strategies in a closed-loop," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    19. Susanne Theuerl & Christiane Herrmann & Monika Heiermann & Philipp Grundmann & Niels Landwehr & Ulrich Kreidenweis & Annette Prochnow, 2019. "The Future Agricultural Biogas Plant in Germany: A Vision," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, January.
    20. Kristjanpoller, Fredy & Crespo, Adolfo & Barberá, Luis & Viveros, Pablo, 2017. "Biomethanation plant assessment based on reliability impact on operational effectiveness," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 301-310.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:32:y:2021:i:6:p:1002-1028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.