IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v31y2020i3p535-544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of appropriate CO2 concentration sampling cycle for MSW incinerators

Author

Listed:
  • Seongmin Kang
  • Jeahyung Cha
  • Changsang Cho
  • Ki-Hyun Kim
  • Eui-Chan Jeon

Abstract

For this study, the CO 2 concentrations of three municipal solid waste incinerators were measured for a year by using the continuous measurement method, and then the collected monthly, quarterly, and half-yearly samples were compared against the average yearly samples, in order to find out the appropriate CO 2 concentration sampling cycle. The results of the Kruskal–Wallis test showed that the averages of the monthly, quarterly, half-yearly, and yearly samples of the three municipal solid waste incinerators were different. Then, the monthly, quarterly, and half-yearly samples were compared to the yearly samples in a post-hoc test. In conclusion, the monthly CO 2 concentrations of incinerator C were different from its yearly samples, and for incinerators A and B, the averages of all of the monthly, quarterly, and half-yearly samples were different from the average of their respective yearly samples. Therefore, the results of this study indicate that monthly samples of the CO 2 concentration of municipal solid waste incinerators, which can be secured in the largest volume and which include the most details, should be secured to investigate the appropriate CO 2 sampling cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Seongmin Kang & Jeahyung Cha & Changsang Cho & Ki-Hyun Kim & Eui-Chan Jeon, 2020. "Estimation of appropriate CO2 concentration sampling cycle for MSW incinerators," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(3), pages 535-544, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:535-544
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X19877698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X19877698
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X19877698?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. P. Royston, 1982. "Expected Normal Order Statistics (Exact and Approximate)," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 31(2), pages 161-165, June.
    2. J. P. Royston, 1982. "The W Test for Normality," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 31(2), pages 176-180, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seongmin Kang & Joonyoung Roh & Eui-chan Jeon, 2020. "Seasonal Variation Analysis Method of GHG at Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-10, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lada, Emily K. & Wilson, James R., 2006. "A wavelet-based spectral procedure for steady-state simulation analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(3), pages 1769-1801, November.
    2. Gustavo Castilho Beruski & Luis Miguel Schiebelbein & André Belmont Pereira, 2020. "Maize Yield Components as Affected by Plant Population, Planting Date and Soil Coverings in Brazil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    3. repec:ers:journl:v:volumexxi:y:2018:i:issue4:p:622-636 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Lauren Bin Dong & David E. A. Giles, 2004. "An Empirical Likelihood Ratio Test for Normality," Econometrics Working Papers 0401, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
    5. Anthony Medford & James W. Vaupel, 2020. "Extremes are not normal: a reminder to demographers," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 91-106, March.
    6. Wangli Xu & Yanwen Li & Dawo Song, 2013. "Testing normality in mixed models using a transformation method," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 71-84, February.
    7. Shalit, Haim, 2012. "Using OLS to test for normality," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(11), pages 2050-2058.
    8. Pettigrew Stephen, 2014. "How the West will be won: using Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the effects of NHL realignment," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 345-355, September.
    9. Tomasz Górecki & Lajos Horváth & Piotr Kokoszka, 2020. "Tests of Normality of Functional Data," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(3), pages 677-697, December.
    10. Amir Abolhassani & Gale Boyd & Majid Jaridi & Bhaskaran Gopalakrishnan & James Harner, 2023. "“Is Energy That Different from Labor?” Similarity in Determinants of Intensity for Auto Assembly Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-35, February.
    11. Carl H. Korkpoe & Peterson Owusu Junior, 2018. "Behaviour of Johannesburg Stock Exchange All Share Index Returns - An Asymmetric GARCH and News Impact Effects Approach," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 68(1), pages 26-42, January-M.
    12. G. P. Brorby & P. J. Sheehan & D. W. Berman & K. T. Bogen & S. E. Holm, 2013. "Exposures from Chrysotile‐Containing Joint Compound: Evaluation of New Model Relating Respirable Dust to Fiber Concentrations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 161-176, January.
    13. Katsaprakakis, Dimitris Al. & Papadakis, Nikos & Kozirakis, George & Minadakis, Yiannis & Christakis, Dimitris & Kondaxakis, Konstantinos, 2009. "Electricity supply on the island of Dia based on renewable energy sources (R.E.S.)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(4), pages 516-527, April.
    14. Gel, Yulia R. & Miao, Weiwen & Gastwirth, Joseph L., 2007. "Robust directed tests of normality against heavy-tailed alternatives," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(5), pages 2734-2746, February.
    15. Daniele Coin, 2017. "A goodness-of-fit test for Generalized Error Distribution," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1096, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    16. Acheampong Owusu, 2017. "Business intelligence systems and bank performance in Ghana: The balanced scorecard approach," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1364056-136, January.
    17. Nathan Lassance & Frédéric Vrins, 2021. "Minimum Rényi entropy portfolios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 23-46, April.
    18. Jurgita Arnastauskaitė & Tomas Ruzgas & Mindaugas Bražėnas, 2021. "A New Goodness of Fit Test for Multivariate Normality and Comparative Simulation Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Martikainen, Teppo & Perttunen, Jukka & Yli-Olli, Paavo & Gunasekaran, A., 1995. "Financial ratio distribution irregularities: Implications for ratio classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 34-44, January.
    20. Roberto Baviera, 2020. "The measure of model risk in credit capital requirements," Papers 2010.08028, arXiv.org.
    21. Ngoc Thien Le & Watit Benjapolakul, 2019. "Evaluation of Contribution of PV Array and Inverter Configurations to Rooftop PV System Energy Yield Using Machine Learning Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-13, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:535-544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.