IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v42y2021i5p195-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Design Considerations for Scarcity Pricing: A Stochastic Equilibrium Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Papavasiliou
  • Yves Smeers
  • Gauthier de Maere d’Aertrycke

Abstract

Scarcity pricing is a mechanism for improving the valuation of reserve capacity in real-time electricity markets. The goal of scarcity pricing is to mitigate the missing money problem and enhance investment in flexible resources. The implementation of scarcity pricing is underway in a number of U.S. markets, including Texas and PJM. The implementation is also currently under consideration in Belgium. As the mechanism was originally conceived in the context of a U.S.-style two-settlement system, its implementation in a European setting poses a number of interesting market design dilemmas which can affect the back-propagation of scarcity prices to forward day-ahead markets for energy and reserve capacity. We propose a modeling framework for analyzing these market design choices based on stochastic equilibrium, and use this modeling framework in order to represent and analyze a wide range of market design proposals. We report results on a case study of the Belgian electricity market.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Papavasiliou & Yves Smeers & Gauthier de Maere d’Aertrycke, 2021. "Market Design Considerations for Scarcity Pricing: A Stochastic Equilibrium Framework," The Energy Journal, , vol. 42(5), pages 195-220, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:42:y:2021:i:5:p:195-220
    DOI: 10.5547/01956574.42.5.apap
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/01956574.42.5.apap
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/01956574.42.5.apap?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morales, Juan M. & Zugno, Marco & Pineda, Salvador & Pinson, Pierre, 2014. "Electricity market clearing with improved scheduling of stochastic production," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 765-774.
    2. Gauthier DE MAERE D’AERTRYCKE & Andreas EHRENMANN & Yves SMEERS, 2017. "Investment with incomplete markets for risk: the need for long-term contracts," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2849, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Victor M. Zavala & Kibaek Kim & Mihai Anitescu & John Birge, 2017. "A Stochastic Electricity Market Clearing Formulation with Consistent Pricing Properties," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 557-576, June.
    4. Ibrahim Abada & Gauthier de Maere d'Aertrycke & Yves Smeers, 2017. "On the multiplicity of solutions in generation capacity investment models with incomplete markets: a ris-averse stochastic equilibrium approach," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2909, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tao, Junyi & Li, Ran & Chen, Sijie & Qu, Hui & Xiang, Yue, 2024. "Reverse impact of capacity markets for a renewable-dominated power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ordoudis, Christos & Delikaraoglou, Stefanos & Kazempour, Jalal & Pinson, Pierre, 2020. "Market-based coordination of integrated electricity and natural gas systems under uncertain supply," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1105-1119.
    2. Anna Schwele & Christos Ordoudis & Pierre Pinson & Jalal Kazempour, 2021. "Coordination of power and natural gas markets via financial instruments," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 505-538, October.
    3. Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette & Midthun, Kjetil & Tomasgard, Asgeir, 2018. "Stochastic electricity dispatch: A challenge for market design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 992-1005.
    4. Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette & Midthun, Kjetil & Tomasgard, Asgeir, 2016. "Stochastic Electricity Dispatch: A challenge for market design," Discussion Papers 2016/11, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    5. Morales, J.M. & Muñoz, M.A. & Pineda, S., 2023. "Prescribing net demand for two-stage electricity generation scheduling," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 10(C).
    6. Dongwei Zhao & Vladimir Dvorkin & Stefanos Delikaraoglou & Alberto J. Lamadrid L. & Audun Botterud, 2023. "Uncertainty-Informed Renewable Energy Scheduling: A Scalable Bilevel Framework," Papers 2312.03868, arXiv.org.
    7. Laur, Arnaud & Nieto-Martin, Jesus & Bunn, Derek W. & Vicente-Pastor, Alejandro, 2020. "Optimal procurement of flexibility services within electricity distribution networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 34-47.
    8. Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette & Midthun, Kjetil & Zakeri, Golbon, 2016. "Congestion Management in a Stochastic Dispatch Model for Electricity Markets," Discussion Papers 2016/12, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    9. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Rintamäki, Tuomas & Siddiqui, Afzal S. & Salo, Ahti, 2020. "Strategic offering of a flexible producer in day-ahead and intraday power markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 1136-1153.
    11. Bjørndal, Endre & Bjørndal, Mette & Rud, Linda & Alangi, Somayeh Rahimi, 2017. "Market Power Under Nodal and Zonal Congestion Management Techniques," Discussion Papers 2017/14, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    12. Victor M. Zavala & Kibaek Kim & Mihai Anitescu & John Birge, 2017. "A Stochastic Electricity Market Clearing Formulation with Consistent Pricing Properties," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 557-576, June.
    13. Botor, Benjamin & Böcker, Benjamin & Kallabis, Thomas & Weber, Christoph, 2021. "Information shocks and profitability risks for power plant investments – impacts of policy instruments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    14. Javad Khazaei & Golbon Zakeri & Shmuel S. Oren, 2017. "Single and Multisettlement Approaches to Market Clearing Under Demand Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1147-1164, October.
    15. Ordoudis, Christos & Pinson, Pierre & Morales, Juan M., 2019. "An Integrated Market for Electricity and Natural Gas Systems with Stochastic Power Producers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 642-654.
    16. Farhad Billimoria & Paul Simshauser, 2023. "Contract design for storage in hybrid electricity markets," Working Papers EPRG2304, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    17. Inzunza, Andrés & Muñoz, Francisco D. & Moreno, Rodrigo, 2021. "Measuring the effects of environmental policies on electricity markets risk," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    18. Moritz Nobis & Carlo Schmitt & Ralf Schemm & Armin Schnettler, 2020. "Pan-European CVaR-Constrained Stochastic Unit Commitment in Day-Ahead and Intraday Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-35, May.
    19. Mete Şeref Ahunbay & Martin Bichler & Johannes Knörr, 2024. "Challenges in Designing Electricity Spot Markets," NBER Chapters, in: New Directions in Market Design, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Thomas Kleinert & Martin Schmidt, 2023. "Why there is no need to use a big-M in linear bilevel optimization: a computational study of two ready-to-use approaches," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:42:y:2021:i:5:p:195-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.