Author
Listed:
- Liesbet Hooghe
(Department of Political Science, 2331University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
RSCAS, 10185European University Institute, Florence, Italy)
- Gary Marks
(Department of Political Science, 2331University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
RSCAS, 10185European University Institute, Florence, Italy)
- Ryan Bakker
(Department of Government, 2591University of Essex, Colchester, UK)
- Seth Jolly
(Political Science, 2029Syracuse University, Syracuse, USA)
- Jonathan Polk
(166452Political Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden)
- Jan Rovny
(Institut d'Etudes Politiques & Centre d'études européennes and LIEPP, Sciences Po, Paris, France)
- Marco Steenbergen
(Department of Political Science, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland)
- Milada Anna Vachudova
(Department of Political Science, 2331University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA)
Abstract
Support for Ukraine against Russian aggression has been strong across Europe, but it is far from uniform. An expert survey of the positions taken by political parties in 29 countries conducted mid-2023 reveals that 97 of 269 parties reject one or more of the following: providing weapons, hosting refugees, supporting Ukraine's path to European Union membership, or accepting higher energy costs. Where the perceived threat from Russia is most severe, we find the greatest levels of support for Ukraine. However, ideology appears to be far more influential. The level of a party's populist rhetoric and its European Union skepticism explain the bulk of variation in support for Ukraine despite our finding that many strongly populist and European Union-skeptical parties take moderate pro-Ukraine positions when in government.
Suggested Citation
Liesbet Hooghe & Gary Marks & Ryan Bakker & Seth Jolly & Jonathan Polk & Jan Rovny & Marco Steenbergen & Milada Anna Vachudova, 2024.
"The Russian threat and the consolidation of the West: How populism and EU-skepticism shape party support for Ukraine,"
European Union Politics, , vol. 25(3), pages 459-482, September.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:25:y:2024:i:3:p:459-482
DOI: 10.1177/14651165241237136
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:25:y:2024:i:3:p:459-482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.