IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/eeupol/v11y2010i4p533-552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practice and payment: Determinants of candidate list position in European Parliament elections

Author

Listed:
  • Sergiu Gherghina

    (Leiden University, The Netherlands, sergiulor@yahoo.com)

  • Mihail Chiru

    (Central European University, Hungary)

Abstract

This article fills a gap in the literature by explaining list composition and placement of candidates in closed PR (proportional representation) settings. Focusing on the case of Romania in the European elections of June 2009, we rely on an original data set including the sociodemographics, career history and wealth of all 215 candidates from the Romanian parties’ parliamentary lists. The results of our rank-ordered logistic regression indicate that at both the national and the party level the political competitors favour previous political experience and wealth of the candidates in establishing their final list order. Marginal effects of support from successful local branches, gender, age and education are also visible for various political parties.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergiu Gherghina & Mihail Chiru, 2010. "Practice and payment: Determinants of candidate list position in European Parliament elections," European Union Politics, , vol. 11(4), pages 533-552, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:11:y:2010:i:4:p:533-552
    DOI: 10.1177/1465116510380284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1465116510380284
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1465116510380284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Hix & Tapio Raunio & Roger Scully, 2003. "Fifty Years on: Research on the European Parliament," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 191-202, April.
    2. Shaun Bowler & David M. Farrell, 1993. "Legislator Shirking and Voter Monitoring: Impacts of European Parliament Electoral Systems upon Legislator‐Voter Relationships," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 45-70, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Busby, Amy and Kheira, Belkacem, 2013. "Coping with the information overload': An exploration of assistants' backstage role in the everyday practice of European Parliament politics," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 17, July.
    2. Abdul G. Noury, 2002. "Ideology, Nationality and Euro-Parliamentarians," European Union Politics, , vol. 3(1), pages 33-58, March.
    3. Rene Lindstadt, Jonathan B. Slapin & Ryan J. Vander Wielen, 2009. "Balancing Competing Demands: Position-Taking and Election Proximity in the European Parliament," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp295, IIIS.
    4. Nikoleta Yordanova, 2009. "The Rationale behind Committee Assignment in the European Parliament," European Union Politics, , vol. 10(2), pages 253-280, June.
    5. repec:ulb:ulbcvp:p0030 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Olle Folke & Johanna Rickne, 2020. "Who wins preference votes? An analysis of party loyalty, ideology, and accountability to voters," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 32(1), pages 11-35, January.
    7. Choy, HiuLam & Gul, Ferdinand A. & Yao, Jun, 2011. "Does political economy reduce agency costs? Some evidence from dividend policies around the world," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 16-35, January.
    8. Guri Rosén, 2019. "Proving Their Worth? The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the Members of the European Parliament," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 266-278.
    9. Robert van Geffen, 2016. "Impact of Career Paths on MEPs’ Activities," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 1017-1032, July.
    10. Mathieu Vieira, 2011. "Does a European Party System Exist ?A Conceptual Framework for Analysis," Cahiers du CEVIPOL/Brussels Working papers 131399, Centre d'étude de la vie politique (CEVIPOL) of the Université Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Jonathan B Slapin & Sven-Oliver Proksch, 2010. "Look who’s talking: Parliamentary debate in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 11(3), pages 333-357, September.
    12. Christian Staat & Colin R. Kuehnhanss, 2017. "Outside Earnings, Electoral Systems and Legislative Effort in the European Parliament," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), pages 368-386, March.
    13. Justin Greenwood & Christilla Roederer‐Rynning, 2015. "The “Europeanization” of the Basel process: Financial harmonization between globalization and parliamentarization," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(4), pages 325-338, December.
    14. Richard Whitaker & Simon Hix & Galina Zapryanova, 2017. "Understanding Members of the European Parliament: Four waves of the European Parliament Research Group MEP survey," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(3), pages 491-506, September.
    15. Nentwich, Michael, 1996. "Opportunity Structures for Citizens' Participation: The Case of the European Union," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 0, November.
    16. Nikoleta Yordanova, 2011. "The European Parliament: In need of a theory," European Union Politics, , vol. 12(4), pages 597-617, December.
    17. Sebastián Umpierrez de Reguero & Patricio Navia, 2024. "Why Do Non‐Resident Citizens Get Elected? Candidates' Electoral Success in Ecuadorian Extraterritorial Districts," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    18. Papagni, Erasmo & Baraldi, Anna Laura & Alfano, Maria Rosaria, 2023. "Ballot structure and political selection. Evidence from changes in electoral rules," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 324-347.
    19. Kris Deschouwer, 2000. "The European Multi-level Party Systems.Towards a Framework for Analysis," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 47, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    20. Pierre Hausemer, 2006. "Participation and Political Competition in Committee Report Allocation," European Union Politics, , vol. 7(4), pages 505-530, December.
    21. Mohammad Badrul Muttakin & Dessalegn Getie Mihret & Tarek Rana, 2021. "Electoral system, corporate political donation, and carbon emission intensity: Cross‐country evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1767-1779, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:eeupol:v:11:y:2010:i:4:p:533-552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.