IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v2y1991i1p57-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Myths and Realities: A Review of the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Angwin

Abstract

There has been little empirical research into enterprise and workplace industrial relations. The Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey fills a major void. This paper examines the results of this Survey. It challenges the ‘industrial relations' perspective adopted as well as some of the major conclusions, particularly those relating to industrial relations constraints upon flexibility. The paper also compares the findings with those of the Business Council's Industrial Relations Study Commission.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Angwin, 1991. "Myths and Realities: A Review of the Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 2(1), pages 57-71, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:2:y:1991:i:1:p:57-71
    DOI: 10.1177/103530469100200105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/103530469100200105
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/103530469100200105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David E. Morgan, 1993. "The Nature of Workplace Relations: A Typology of Social Relations and Analysis of Industrial Relations Systems," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 4(1), pages 140-166, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:2:y:1991:i:1:p:57-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.