IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v25y2011i3p211-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing Stakeholder Participation in Industry Cluster Identification

Author

Listed:
  • Lukas C. Brun

    (Duke University, Durham, NC, USA, lukas.brun@duke.edu)

  • G. Jason Jolley

    (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA)

Abstract

Industry cluster analysis has become an important policy tool in state and local economic development planning. Although cluster analysis is generally conceived as an expert-led technical analysis, it can be reframed to engage stakeholders in a collaborative process. This paper illustrates how one community pursued a collaborative approach to cluster identification and the costs and benefits of the method. It finds that increased stakeholder participation in the cluster identification stage improved the analytical quality of the analysis, developed community and political acceptance of the results, and defined a new industry cluster to accommodate stakeholder preferences. The main costs were the time and money required to implement a collaborative approach to cluster identification.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukas C. Brun & G. Jason Jolley, 2011. "Increasing Stakeholder Participation in Industry Cluster Identification," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 25(3), pages 211-220, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:25:y:2011:i:3:p:211-220
    DOI: 10.1177/0891242411409208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0891242411409208
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0891242411409208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Porter, 2003. "The Economic Performance of Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6-7), pages 549-578.
    2. Edward Feser & Edward Bergman, 2000. "National Industry Cluster Templates: A Framework for Applied Regional Cluster Analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 1-19.
    3. Thomas C. Beierle, 2002. "The Quality of Stakeholder‐Based Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 739-749, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu, Ren & Ruan, Min & Reve, Torger, 2016. "Cluster and co-located cluster effects: An empirical study of six Chinese city regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1984-1995.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Delgado, Mercedes & Porter, Michael E. & Stern, Scott, 2014. "Clusters, convergence, and economic performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 1785-1799.
    2. George Christopoulos & René Wintjes, 2024. "Identifying Clusters as Local Innovation Systems," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9784-9823, June.
    3. Nataliya V. Yakovenko & Lyudmila V. Semenova & Elena Y. Nikolskaya & Elena Y. Semenova & Zhanar S. Rakhimbekova & Anzor Kh. Karanashev & Marina Ye. Tsoy & Natalia A. Azarova, 2024. "Innovative Development of Russian Regions: Assessment and Dynamics in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Reinhold Kosfeld & Mirko Titze, 2014. "Benchmark Value Added Chains and Regional Clusters in German R&D Intensive Industries," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201437, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    5. Xu, Cheng-Gang & Guo, Di & Jiang, Kun & Yang, Xiyi, 2017. "Clustering, Growth, and Inequality in China," CEPR Discussion Papers 12543, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Andrew M. Isserman & James Westervelt, 2006. "1.5 Million Missing Numbers: Overcoming Employment Suppression in County Business Patterns Data," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 29(3), pages 311-335, July.
    7. Chávez Juan Carlos & Katia García Loredo, 2015. "Identification of Regional Clusters in Mexican Manufacturing Industry," Working Papers 2015-19, Banco de México.
    8. Thomas Brenner, 2017. "Identification of Clusters - An Actor based Approach," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2017-02, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    9. Juárez-Torres Miriam & Puigvert Jonathan & Zazueta-Borboa Francisco, 2022. "The Role of Clusters in the Performance of the Mexican Economy," Working Papers 2022-06, Banco de México.
    10. Christine Nolan & Ed Morrison & Indraneel Kumar & Hamilton Galloway & Sam Cordes, 2011. "Linking Industry and Occupation Clusters in Regional Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 25(1), pages 26-35, February.
    11. Erkul Abdullah & Kırankabeş Mustafa Cem, 2024. "Porter-Type Regional Agglomerations, Export Performance, and Inclusive Regional Policy: An Empirical Assessment of Turkish Manufacturing Sector," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 19(2), pages 136-152.
    12. Bergman, Edward M., 2007. "Cluster life-cycles: an emerging synthesis," SRE-Discussion Papers 2007/04, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    13. Davenport, Sally, 2005. "Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 683-701, June.
    14. Imre Lengyel, 2011. "Types of competitiveness of Hungarian regions: agglomeration economies and endogenous regional development," ERSA conference papers ersa11p674, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Amanda P. Rehr & Mitchell J. Small & Paul S. Fischbeck & Patricia Bradley & William S. Fisher, 2014. "The role of scientific studies in building consensus in environmental decision making: a coral reef example," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 60-87, March.
    16. Rui Baptista & Joana Mendonça, 2010. "Proximity to knowledge sources and the location of knowledge-based start-ups," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 45(1), pages 5-29, August.
    17. David Doloreux & David Rangdrol & Émilie Dionne, 2010. "Francophone Minority Economic Development in Canada: Addressing Political or Economic Issues?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 24(2), pages 143-153, May.
    18. Ronald V Kalafsky & William Graves, 2023. "Global connections from the second-tier: The trade performance of smaller southern US cities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(5), pages 443-459, August.
    19. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung - welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert des Wachstum?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 144, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    20. Víctor G. Alfaro-García & Anna M. Gil-Lafuente & Gerardo G. Alfaro Calderón, 2017. "A fuzzy approach to a municipality grouping model towards creation of synergies," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 391-408, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:25:y:2011:i:3:p:211-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.