IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/crnind/v17y2016i3-4p204-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retail Price Regulation in the British Energy Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Claude Crampes
  • Mathias Laffont

Abstract

In this paper, we revisit the 2009–2012 episode in which Ofgem imposed a nondiscrimination clause on large retailers in the UK energy market. The Standard Licence Condition 25A (SLC 25A) was introduced to prevent suppliers from charging their incumbent customers higher prices than their out-of-area customers. The SLC 25A included a “sunset clause†, to allow the condition to lapse three years after its implementation. Several IO economists protested that the prohibition of spatial price discrimination would eventually lead to competition weakening. At the end of the three-year period, Ofgem decided not to renew SLC 25A for any period. To further our understanding of Ofgem's motives and its opponents' arguments, we build a model where two local monopolists compete on a third market. We determine conditions where the obligation to set the same price in and out of the local market can result in a better or a worse situation for consumers. We show that even when the ban on price discrimination weakens competition, the average consumer can be better off.

Suggested Citation

  • Claude Crampes & Mathias Laffont, 2016. "Retail Price Regulation in the British Energy Industry," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 17(3-4), pages 204-225, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:crnind:v:17:y:2016:i:3-4:p:204-225
    DOI: 10.1177/178359171601700301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/178359171601700301
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/178359171601700301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Littlechild, 2014. "Promoting or restricting competition?: Regulation of the UK retail residential energy market since 2008," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1441, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Bester, Helmut & Petrakis, Emmanuel, 1996. "Coupons and oligopolistic price discrimination," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 227-242.
    3. Morten Hviid & Catherine Waddams Price, 2012. "Non‐Discrimination Clauses in the Retail Energy Sector," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 122(562), pages 236-252, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simshauser, Paul, 2018. "Price discrimination and the modes of failure in deregulated retail electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 54-70.
    2. Simshauser, Paul & Whish-Wilson, Patrick, 2017. "Price discrimination in Australia's retail electricity markets: An analysis of Victoria & Southeast Queensland," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 92-103.
    3. Paul Simshauser & David Downer, 2016. "On the Inequity of Flat-rate Electricity Tariffs," The Energy Journal, , vol. 37(3), pages 199-230, July.
    4. Simshauser, Paul & Tian, Yuan & Whish-Wilson, Patrick, 2015. "Vertical integration in energy-only electricity markets," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 35-56.
    5. Stephen Littlechild, 2019. "Promoting competition and protecting customers? Regulation of the GB retail energy market 2008–2016," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 107-139, April.
    6. Danias, Nikolaos & Swales, J. Kim, 2018. "The welfare impacts of discriminatory price tariffs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 321-331.
    7. Esplin, Ryan & Davis, Ben & Rai, Alan & Nelson, Tim, 2020. "The impacts of price regulation on price dispersion in Australia's retail electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    8. Li, Youping & Shuai, Jie, 2019. "Monopolistic competition, price discrimination and welfare," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 114-117.
    9. Jentzsch, Nicola & Sapi, Geza & Suleymanova, Irina, 2013. "Targeted pricing and customer data sharing among rivals," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 131-144.
    10. Anindya Ghose & Ke‐Wei Huang, 2009. "Personalized Pricing and Quality Customization," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 1095-1135, December.
    11. Stole, Lars A., 2007. "Price Discrimination and Competition," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: Mark Armstrong & Robert Porter (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 34, pages 2221-2299, Elsevier.
    12. Gregory J. King & Xiuli Chao & Izak Duenyas, 2019. "Who Benefits When Prescription Drug Manufacturers Offer Copay Coupons?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3758-3775, August.
    13. Irina Baye & Geza Sapi, 2020. "Consumer foresight, customer data, and investment in targeting technology," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 67(4), pages 363-386, September.
    14. Bouckaert, J.M.C. & Degryse, H.A., 2006. "Opt In versus Opt Out : A Free-Entry Analysis of Privacy Policies," Other publications TiSEM 17393c5d-1ed2-47ec-bc96-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Lu, Wenbo & Shuai, Jie, 2024. "Endogenous price discrimination with asymmetric firms," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    16. Lola Esteban & José M. Hernández & José Luis Moraga‐González, 2006. "Customer Directed Advertising and Product Quality," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(4), pages 943-968, December.
    17. Imke Reimers & Claire (Chunying) Xie, 2019. "Do Coupons Expand or Cannibalize Revenue? Evidence from an e-Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 286-300, January.
    18. Greg Shaffer & Z. John Zhang, 2002. "Competitive One-to-One Promotions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(9), pages 1143-1160, September.
    19. Sapi, Geza & Suleymanova, Irina, 2013. "Consumer flexibility, data quality and targeted pricing," DICE Discussion Papers 117, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    20. Ongena, Steven & Paraschiv, Florentina & Reite, Endre J., 2023. "Counteroffers and Price Discrimination in Mortgage Lending," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:crnind:v:17:y:2016:i:3-4:p:204-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.