IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/crmide/v11y2024i2p231-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The US-China Rivalry in the Middle East: Confrontation or Competitive Coexistence

Author

Listed:
  • Mordechai Chaziza

Abstract

A new era of great power rivalry has returned to the center of the global stage. The Middle East has emerged as one of the key arenas where this rivalry is being played out, and analyzing it through the lens of power transition theory provides valuable insights into the dynamics at play. This study focuses on the great power rivalry between the United States and China in the Middle East through the lens of power transition theory. It examines whether this great power rivalry in the region will allow them to pursue competitive coexistence or if they can expect increasing levels of confrontation and mutual deterrence. The study maintains that the US-China rivalry in the Middle East is multidimensional and spans primarily three dimensions: geo-economic (the Belt and Road Initiative framework), geopolitical (partnership diplomacy), and the race for technological supremacy (the Digital Silk Road). While conflict is not inevitable, it is essential to recognize the potential for confrontation and build a coordinated mechanism to manage and mitigate these tensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mordechai Chaziza, 2024. "The US-China Rivalry in the Middle East: Confrontation or Competitive Coexistence," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 11(2), pages 231-252, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:crmide:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:231-252
    DOI: 10.1177/23477989241240899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23477989241240899
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23477989241240899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mordechai Chaziza, 2023. "The Non-interference Principle and the BRI Grand Strategy in the GCC," China Report, , vol. 59(1), pages 40-57, February.
    2. John CALABRESE, 2023. "The United States, China and the Gulf Arab States in the Era of Great Power Competition," East Asian Policy (EAP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 98-114, September.
    3. Lippert, Barbara (Ed.) & Perthes, Volker (Ed.), 2020. "Strategic rivalry between United States and China: Causes, tragectories, and implications for Europe," SWP Research Papers 4/2020, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
    4. Bingbing Wu, 2021. "China and New Middle East," Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 443-457, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junjie Zhao, 2023. "Breaking the general election effect. The impact of the 2020 US presidential election on Chinese economy and counter strategies," Papers 2304.11518, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:crmide:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:231-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.