IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ausman/v9y1984i2p43-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Case for User-Oriented Innovation: Comments on the National Technology Strategy (Discussion Draft)

Author

Listed:
  • David F. Midgley

    (Australian Graduate School of Management.)

  • John H. Roberts

    (Australian Graduate School of Management.)

Abstract

This paper examines the National Technology Strategy (Discussion Draft) recently released by the erstwhile Department of Science and Technology from the perspective of existing knowledge and research in the Diffusion of Innovations and New Product Development fields. We argue that there are three elements essential to a major change in structural emphasis; a supportive environment, a sound technological base, and a thorough appreciation of the needs and values of end users. The draft strategy contains valuable suggestions in the first two areas, but incorporating end user values into product development is almost totally neglected in spite of a substantial body of literature suggesting the dangers of this approach. The focus of this paper is to establish the need for market factors and user considerations to be given more prominence in the National Technology Strategy. A number of government activities to promote the incorporation of end-user values are suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • David F. Midgley & John H. Roberts, 1984. "The Case for User-Oriented Innovation: Comments on the National Technology Strategy (Discussion Draft)," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 9(2), pages 43-47, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:9:y:1984:i:2:p:43-47
    DOI: 10.1177/031289628400900205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/031289628400900205
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/031289628400900205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:9:y:1984:i:2:p:43-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.