IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ausman/v27y2002i1_supplp89-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Espoused Values of Organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Boris Kabanoff

    (School of Management, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000.)

  • Joseph Daly

    (Walker College of Business, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608–2089.)

Abstract

We review a series of studies whose focus is the measurement and comparison of values espoused by organisations in their public documents, in particular their annual reports. We begin by considering the construct of organizational values and the advantages and assumptions involved in using content-analysis of organizational documents to measure espoused values. Three interrelated studies of espoused organisational values are then described. The first of these investigates the value profiles of a sample of large Australian companies in order to test the validity of a previously developed typology of organisational values derived from distributive and procedural justice theory (Kabanoff, 1991). Changes in organisational values over time for the same group of companies are then considered. This study illustrates that how one studies value change, either in a univariate way by comparing single values over time or by comparing the incidence of different organisational ‘types’, that is organisational with different types of value profiles, significantly influences the results and interpretations of changes over time. The final study is a cross-national comparison involving Australian and US organisations that reveals several meaningful differences between the countries in the incidence of organisations with different value profiles. We conclude with a brief discussion of future planned research using the same methodology and focusing on the role of espoused values in organisational mergers and acquisitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Boris Kabanoff & Joseph Daly, 2002. "Espoused Values of Organisations," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 27(1_suppl), pages 89-104, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:27:y:2002:i:1_suppl:p:89-104
    DOI: 10.1177/031289620202701S10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/031289620202701S10
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/031289620202701S10?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martinus Parnawa Putranta, 2017. "The Relationships between Personal Values, Institutional Values and Affective Commitment (A Case of Graduate Students at A FaithBased Institution in Indonesia)," GATR Journals jmmr146, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    2. Minbaeva, Dana & Rabbiosi, Larissa & Stahl, Günter K., 2018. "Not walking the talk? How host country cultural orientations may buffer the damage of corporate values’ misalignment in multinational corporations," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 880-895.
    3. Tser-Yieth Chen & Chi-Jui Huang, 2019. "Dual Pathways of Value Endorsement in Green Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Krista Jaakson, 2008. "The Role of Organisational Stakeholders in the Formulation of Values Statements," Working Papers 171, Tallinn School of Economics and Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology.
    5. Sefa Hayibor & David Wasieleski, 2009. "Effects of the Use of the Availability Heuristic on Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 151-165, January.
    6. repec:mje:mjejnl:v:12:y:2017:i:2:p:81-92 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Jolita Vveinhardt & Evelina Gulbovaite, 2017. "Congruence of Personal and Organizational Values: Moving Beyond Practice," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 13(2), pages 81-92.
    8. Tjaša Štrukelj & Jelena Nikolić & Dejana Zlatanović & Simona Sternad Zabukovšek, 2020. "A Strategic Model for Sustainable Business Policy Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-28, January.
    9. Jana L. Craft, 2018. "Common Thread: The Impact of Mission on Ethical Business Culture. A Case Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 127-145, April.
    10. Humphrey Bourne & Mark Jenkins & Emma Parry, 2019. "Mapping Espoused Organizational Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 133-148, September.
    11. Birgitte Grøgaard & Helene Loe Colman, 2016. "Interpretive Frames as the Organization’s “Mirror”: From Espoused Values to Social Integration in MNEs," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 171-194, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:27:y:2002:i:1_suppl:p:89-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.