IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ausman/v12y1987i1p91-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Positive versus Negative Feedback on Rôle Ambiguity

Author

Listed:
  • Robert E. Wood

    (The Australian Graduate School of Management.)

  • Sukumar Arasu

    (The Australian Graduate School of Management.)

Abstract

The present study examined the directing, as distinct from the motivational, effects of feedback sign. Rôle ambiguity was chosen as the dependent variable because the directing function of feedback relates directly to the level of task understanding and not, necessarily, to the level of task effort. It was hypothesised that positive feedback would have a stronger directing effect than negative feedback and, therefore, would lead to greater reductions in rôle ambiguity. Survey data were collected from 530 subjects in a variety of jobs in four different Australian organisations. The hypothesised effects were supported. However, multicollinearity between feedback amount and positive feedback reduced the latter to nonsignificance in a model including both variables. Tests for possible moderators showed that positive feedback had a greater effect on rôle ambiguity than did negative feedback for all job types in all organisations. All results were cross validated on two randomly selected sub-samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert E. Wood & Sukumar Arasu, 1987. "The Effects of Positive versus Negative Feedback on Rôle Ambiguity," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 12(1), pages 91-101, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:12:y:1987:i:1:p:91-101
    DOI: 10.1177/031289628701200107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/031289628701200107
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/031289628701200107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:12:y:1987:i:1:p:91-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.