IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v658y2015i1p223-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Need for Knowledge-Based Journalism in Politicized Science Debates

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew C. Nisbet
  • Declan Fahy

Abstract

Largely overlooked by researchers studying the science of science communication are the specific journalistic practices and media structures that might enable more constructive public debate in politicized science controversies. In this commentary, we discuss the role that journalists can play as influential knowledge professionals, drawing on insights from the studies in this section of the special issue. In doing so, we outline three complementary approaches to what Thomas Patterson calls “knowledge-based journalism.†By way of these approaches, journalists and their news organizations can contextualize and critically evaluate expert knowledge; facilitate discussion that bridges entrenched ideological divisions; and promote consideration of a broader menu of policy options and technologies. We conclude by discussing the implications for journalism education.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew C. Nisbet & Declan Fahy, 2015. "The Need for Knowledge-Based Journalism in Politicized Science Debates," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 658(1), pages 223-234, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:658:y:2015:i:1:p:223-234
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716214559887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716214559887
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716214559887?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erika Franklin Fowler & Sarah E. Gollust, 2015. "The Content and Effect of Politicized Health Controversies," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 658(1), pages 155-171, March.
    2. Nisbet, Matthew C, 2013. "Nature's Prophet: Bill McKibben as Journalist, Public Intellectual and Activist. Joan Shorenstein Center for Press, Politics, and Public Policy. Discussion Paper Series, D-78 March. Cambridge, MA: Ken," Working Paper 128746, Harvard University OpenScholar.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goggins, Sydney, 2024. "Discursive trends in New York Times coverage of Evusheld access: A case study in the social production of ignorance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    2. K.C. Busch & Regina Ayala Chávez, 2022. "Adolescent framings of climate change, psychological distancing, and implications for climate change concern and behavior," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Young, Dannagal G. & Rasheed, Huma & Bleakley, Amy & Langbaum, Jessica B., 2022. "The politics of mask-wearing: Political preferences, reactance, and conflict aversion during COVID," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    2. Ramey Moore & Don E. Willis & Sumit K. Shah & Rachel S. Purvis & Xochitl Shields & Pearl A. McElfish, 2021. "“The Risk Seems Too High”: Thoughts and Feelings about COVID-19 Vaccination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-9, August.
    3. Lueck, Jennifer A. & Callaghan, Timothy, 2022. "Inside the ‘black box’ of COVID-19 vaccination beliefs: Revealing the relative importance of public confidence and news consumption habits," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:658:y:2015:i:1:p:223-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.