IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v656y2014i1p41-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

U.S. Aid and Uneven Development in East Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Gray

Abstract

This article discusses the divergent developmental outcomes among postwar South Korea, Taiwan, and South Vietnam. While U.S. aid has correctly been identified as a key factor in the rapid postwar development of South Korea and Taiwan, the failure of aid to establish strong institutions in South Vietnam calls for a closer analysis of how different historical and geopolitical factors explain the greater political stability and institutional capacity of South Korea and Taiwan. In particular, the legacies of Japanese colonialism are seen as having played a key role in establishing the strong developmental states of South Korea and Taiwan, while the postcolonial South Vietnamese state was more fragile. As such, there was greater political resistance to land reform in the latter, and large amounts of U.S. economic and military aid were unable to quell domestic insurgency and establish the basis for economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Gray, 2014. "U.S. Aid and Uneven Development in East Asia," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 656(1), pages 41-58, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:656:y:2014:i:1:p:41-58
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716214543899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716214543899
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716214543899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cumings, Bruce, 1984. "The origins and development of the Northeast Asian political economy: industrial sectors, product cycles, and political consequences," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(1), pages 1-40, January.
    2. Nan Wiegersma & Joseph E. Medley, 2000. "Aid and Development," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: US Economic Development Policies towards the Pacific Rim, chapter 1, pages 1-15, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Dacy,Douglas C., 1986. "Foreign Aid, War, and Economic Development," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521303279, November.
    4. Chung, Young-Iob, 2007. "South Korea in the Fast Lane: Economic Development and Capital Formation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195325454.
    5. Kohli, Atul, 1994. "Where do high growth political economies come from? The Japanese lineage of Korea's "developmental state"," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 22(9), pages 1269-1293, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gray, Kevin, 2013. "Aid and Development in Taiwan, South Korea, and South Vietnam," WIDER Working Paper Series 085, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Kevin Gray, 2013. "Aid and Development in Taiwan, South Korea, and South Vietnam," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-085, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Bolesta, Andrzej, 2014. "The East Asian industrial policy: a critical analysis of the developmental state," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Christina Lai, 2018. "Economic Nationalism in South Korea and Taiwan: Examining Identity Discourse and Threat Perceptions towards Japan after the Second World War (1960s–1970s)," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 5(2), pages 149-171, August.
    5. Ji Yeon Hong & Christopher Paik, 2018. "Colonization and education: exploring the legacy of local elites in Korea," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 71(3), pages 938-964, August.
    6. Haggard, Stephan & Kang, David & Moon, Chung-In, 1997. "Japanese colonialism and Korean development: A critique," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 867-881, June.
    7. Waterbury, John, 1999. "The Long Gestation and Brief Triumph of Import-Substituting Industrialization," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 323-341, February.
    8. Jim Glassman, 2018. "Geopolitical economies of development and democratization in East Asia: Themes, concepts, and geographies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(2), pages 407-415, March.
    9. Alejandro Ayuso‐Díaz & Antonio Tena‐Junguito, 2020. "Trade in the shadow of power: Japanese industrial exports in the interwar years," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 73(3), pages 815-843, August.
    10. Jose Asturias & Sewon Hur & Timothy J. Kehoe & Kim J. Ruhl, 2023. "Firm Entry and Exit and Aggregate Growth," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 48-105, January.
    11. Hyejin Kim, 2022. "South and/or north: an indigenous seed movement in South Korea and the multiple bases of food sovereignty," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 521-533, June.
    12. Guillermo Maya Munoz, 2018. "¿Por qué Corea del Sur sí pudo?," Ensayos de Economía 16774, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín.
    13. Shigehisa Kasahara, 2004. "The Flying Geese Paradigm: A Critical Study Of Its Application To East Asian Regional Development," UNCTAD Discussion Papers 169, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    14. Arimoto, Yutaka & Lee, Changmin, 2014. "Did Japanese direct investment in Korea suppress indigenous industrialization in the 1930s? : evidence from country-level factory entry patterns," IDE Discussion Papers 450, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    15. Bolesta Andrzej, 2018. "Post-socialist Myanmar and the East Asian Development Model," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 5(52), pages 172-185, January.
    16. Prema-chandra Athukorala, 2021. "Asian economic development: A primer," Departmental Working Papers 2021-07, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    17. Xiaoguang Wang, 2020. "Leadership-building dilemmas in emerging powers’ economic diplomacy: Russia’s energy diplomacy and China’s OBOR," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 117-138, March.
    18. Sai Khaing Myo Tun, 2011. "A Comparative Study of State-Led Development in Myanmar (1988–2010) and Suharto’s Indonesia: An Approach from the Developmental State Theory," Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 30(1), pages 69-94.
    19. repec:yon:wpaper:2023rwp-218 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Dennis Patterson & Jangsup Choi, 2018. "Diplomacy, trade, and South Korea’s rise to international influence," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 21(1), pages 9-27, March.
    21. Lange, Matthew K., 2004. "British Colonial Legacies and Political Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 905-922, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    aid; development; Korea; Taiwan; Vietnam;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:656:y:2014:i:1:p:41-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.