IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v584y2002i1p69-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Precautionary Principle and Public Health Trade-Offs: Case Study of West Nile Virus

Author

Listed:
  • Joel A. Tickner

    (Department of Work Environment, University of MassachusettsLowell)

Abstract

During the summer of 1999, the West Nile Virus, a mosquito-borne virus, made its first appearance in North America. Public health officials throughout New England were forced to quickly respond to a novel threat, in many cases resorting to pesticide spraying that carried real but uncertain risks. This article explores the tensions faced by public health officials when making decisions regarding uncertain risks, particularly when there might be trade-offs between those risks. It examines the role of the precautionary principle--a guide to decision making under uncertainty--in trying to mediate these trade-offs. It is concluded that by exploring and implementing a wide range of preventive options, including a broad range of perspectives in decision-making processes, using a multidisciplinary scientific lens and systems perspective to examine risks, and developing methods to monitor public health interventions for signals of problems, such trade-offs can be minimized or avoided in a truly precautionary manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Joel A. Tickner, 2002. "The Precautionary Principle and Public Health Trade-Offs: Case Study of West Nile Virus," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 584(1), pages 69-79, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:584:y:2002:i:1:p:69-79
    DOI: 10.1177/000271620258400105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271620258400105
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271620258400105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goldstein, B.D., 2001. "The precautionary principle also applies to public health actions," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(9), pages 1358-1361.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabrina Haroon & Teck Chuan Voo & Hillary Chua & Gan Liang Tan & Titus Lau, 2022. "Telemedicine and Haemodialysis Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrative Review of Patient Safety, Healthcare Quality, Ethics and the Legal Considerations in Singapore Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Coroneo, Laura & Iacone, Fabrizio & Paccagnini, Alessia & Santos Monteiro, Paulo, 2023. "Testing the predictive accuracy of COVID-19 forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 606-622.
    3. Kumanan Wilson & Blair Leonard & Robert Wright & Ian Graham & John Moffet & Michael Pluscauskas & Michael Wilson, 2006. "Application of the Precautionary Principle by Senior Policy Officials: Results of a Canadian Survey," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 981-988, August.
    4. Thierry Hurlimann & Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas & Abha Saxena & Gerardo Zamora & Béatrice Godard, 2017. "Ethical issues in the development and implementation of nutrition-related public health policies and interventions: A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Joel Tickner & Tami Gouveia‐Vigeant, 2005. "The 1991 Cholera Epidemic in Peru: Not a Case of Precaution Gone Awry," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 495-502, June.
    6. Heather Wardle & Gerda Reith & Fiona Dobbie & Angela Rintoul & Jeremy Shiffman, 2021. "Regulatory Resistance? Narratives and Uses of Evidence around “Black Market” Provision of Gambling during the British Gambling Act Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-20, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:584:y:2002:i:1:p:69-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.