IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i21p11566-d671607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulatory Resistance? Narratives and Uses of Evidence around “Black Market” Provision of Gambling during the British Gambling Act Review

Author

Listed:
  • Heather Wardle

    (School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RT, UK
    Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, UK)

  • Gerda Reith

    (School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RT, UK)

  • Fiona Dobbie

    (Usher Institute, Old Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK)

  • Angela Rintoul

    (Health Innovation and Transformation Centre, Federation University, Churchill, VIC 3842, Australia)

  • Jeremy Shiffman

    (Bloomberg School of Public Health and School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

Abstract

Commercial gambling is increasingly viewed as being part of the unhealthy commodities industries, in which products contribute to preventable ill-health globally. Britain has one of the world’s most liberal gambling markets, meaning that the regulatory changes there have implications for developments elsewhere. A review of the British Gambling Act 2005 is underway. This has generated a range of actions by the industry, including mobilising arguments around the threat of the “black market”. We critically explore industry’s framing of these issues as part of their strategy to resist regulatory change during the Gambling Act review. We used a predefined review protocol to explore industry narratives about the “black market” in media reports published between 8 December 2020 and 26 May 2021. Fifty-five articles were identified and reviewed, and themes were narratively synthesised to examine industry framing of the “black market”. The black market was framed in terms of economic threat and loss, and a direct connection was made between its growth and increased regulation. The articles mainly presented gambling industry perspectives uncritically, citing industry-generated evidence ( n = 40). Industry narratives around the “black market” speak to economically and emotionally salient concerns: fear, safety, consumer freedom and economic growth. This dominant framing in political, mainstream and industry media may influence political and public opinion to support the current status quo: “protecting” the existing regulated market rather than “protecting” people. Debates should be reframed to consider all policy options, especially those designed to protect public health.

Suggested Citation

  • Heather Wardle & Gerda Reith & Fiona Dobbie & Angela Rintoul & Jeremy Shiffman, 2021. "Regulatory Resistance? Narratives and Uses of Evidence around “Black Market” Provision of Gambling during the British Gambling Act Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11566-:d:671607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11566/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11566/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goldstein, B.D., 2001. "The precautionary principle also applies to public health actions," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(9), pages 1358-1361.
    2. Rob Moodie, A., 2017. "What public health practitioners need to know about unhealthy industry tactics," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(7), pages 1047-1049.
    3. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2017.303861_0 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alan C. Logan & Diana H. Fishbein, 2024. "Prevention Science Can’t Wait: An Interview with Dr. Diana H. Fishbein," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Townsend, Belinda & Schram, Ashley & Labonté, Ronald & Baum, Fran & Friel, Sharon, 2019. "How do actors with asymmetrical power assert authority in policy agenda-setting? A study of authority claims by health actors in trade policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Susan L. Prescott & Alan C. Logan & David L. Katz, 2019. "Preventive Medicine for Person, Place, and Planet: Revisiting the Concept of High-Level Wellness in the Planetary Health Paradigm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Sabrina Haroon & Teck Chuan Voo & Hillary Chua & Gan Liang Tan & Titus Lau, 2022. "Telemedicine and Haemodialysis Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrative Review of Patient Safety, Healthcare Quality, Ethics and the Legal Considerations in Singapore Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Susan L. Prescott & Alan C. Logan, 2019. "Narrative Medicine Meets Planetary Health: Mindsets Matter in the Anthropocene," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Alan C. Logan & Stephen J. Schoenthaler, 2023. "Nutrition, Behavior, and the Criminal Justice System: What Took so Long? An Interview with Dr. Stephen J. Schoenthaler," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Amy Rudge & Kristen Foley & Belinda Lunnay & Emma R. Miller & Samantha Batchelor & Paul R. Ward, 2021. "How Are the Links between Alcohol Consumption and Breast Cancer Portrayed in Australian Newspapers?: A Paired Thematic and Framing Media Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Coroneo, Laura & Iacone, Fabrizio & Paccagnini, Alessia & Santos Monteiro, Paulo, 2023. "Testing the predictive accuracy of COVID-19 forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 606-622.
    9. Kumanan Wilson & Blair Leonard & Robert Wright & Ian Graham & John Moffet & Michael Pluscauskas & Michael Wilson, 2006. "Application of the Precautionary Principle by Senior Policy Officials: Results of a Canadian Survey," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 981-988, August.
    10. Thierry Hurlimann & Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas & Abha Saxena & Gerardo Zamora & Béatrice Godard, 2017. "Ethical issues in the development and implementation of nutrition-related public health policies and interventions: A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, October.
    11. Alan C. Logan & Susan H. Berman & Brian M. Berman & Susan L. Prescott, 2021. "Healing Anthropocene Syndrome: Planetary Health Requires Remediation of the Toxic Post-Truth Environment," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, January.
    12. Alan C. Logan & Christopher R. D’Adamo & Susan L. Prescott, 2023. "The Founder: Dispositional Greed, Showbiz, and the Commercial Determinants of Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Susan L. Prescott & Alan C. Logan, 2018. "From Authoritarianism to Advocacy: Lifestyle-Driven, Socially-Transmitted Conditions Require a Transformation in Medical Training and Practice," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-29, March.
    14. Susan L. Prescott & Jeffrey S. Bland, 2020. "Spaceship Earth Revisited: The Co-Benefits of Overcoming Biological Extinction of Experience at the Level of Person, Place and Planet," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Susan L. Prescott & Alan C. Logan, 2018. "Larger Than Life: Injecting Hope into the Planetary Health Paradigm," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-27, March.
    16. Joel A. Tickner, 2002. "The Precautionary Principle and Public Health Trade-Offs: Case Study of West Nile Virus," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 584(1), pages 69-79, November.
    17. Joel Tickner & Tami Gouveia‐Vigeant, 2005. "The 1991 Cholera Epidemic in Peru: Not a Case of Precaution Gone Awry," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 495-502, June.
    18. Susan L. Prescott & Alan C. Logan & Christopher R. D’Adamo & Kathleen F. Holton & Christopher A. Lowry & John Marks & Rob Moodie & Blake Poland, 2024. "Nutritional Criminology: Why the Emerging Research on Ultra-Processed Food Matters to Health and Justice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-25, January.
    19. Clarke, Brydie & Swinburn, Boyd & Sacks, Gary, 2019. "Investigating menu kilojoule labelling policy adoption from a political science perspective," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    20. David H. Nelson & Susan L. Prescott & Alan C. Logan & Jeffrey S. Bland, 2019. "Clinical Ecology—Transforming 21st-Century Medicine with Planetary Health in Mind," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:21:p:11566-:d:671607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.