IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/amsocr/v89y2024i5p907-936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Work Becomes Invisible: The Erosion of the Wage Floor for Workers with Disabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Emily H. Ruppel

Abstract

How does work come to be constructed as a service to the worker? In the United States, the payment of subminimum wages to disabled workers has been legal since 1938 and was entrenched by 1986 legislation eliminating the previously mandated floor of 50 percent of the minimum wage. This article draws on primary historical materials to explain the passage of these amendments, which I analyze as a case of delaborization , a process through which work is mystified as such and reclassified as something else (e.g., service). I find that the managers of segregated workshops for disabled manual laborers rose to control disability employment policy in the aftermath of deinstitutionalization. Professionals mobilized disability stigma to frame the subminimum wage as a social welfare issue subject to their expertise and to lobby successfully for its entrenchment. Weaknesses in the disability–labor coalition enabled this seizure of jurisdiction. This research illuminates professional expertise, the withdrawal of labor unions, and identity-based stigma as major mechanisms driving delaborization, an important contemporary influence on the organization of work. The case of the subminimum wage thus develops sociological literatures on labor, disability, and politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily H. Ruppel, 2024. "How Work Becomes Invisible: The Erosion of the Wage Floor for Workers with Disabilities," American Sociological Review, , vol. 89(5), pages 907-936, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:89:y:2024:i:5:p:907-936
    DOI: 10.1177/00031224241268201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224241268201
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00031224241268201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morgan, Kimberly J. & Campbell, Andrea Louise, 2011. "The Delegated Welfare State: Medicare, Markets, and the Governance of Social Policy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199730353.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicole P Marwell, 2016. "Rethinking the state in urban outcasts," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(6), pages 1095-1098, May.
    2. Charles Crabtree & John B. Holbein & J. Quin Monson, 2022. "Patient traits shape health-care stakeholders’ choices on how to best allocate life-saving care," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 244-257, February.
    3. Adrienne Davidson & Samantha Burns & Linda White & Delaine Hampton & Michal Perlman, 2020. "Child care policy and child care burden: Policy feedback effects and distributive implications of regulatory decisions," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(2).
    4. Maroine Bendaoud, 2021. "Privatization of Canadian housing assistance: how bureaucrats on a budget added market-based progams to the toolbox," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(2), pages 423-440, June.
    5. Momani Bessma, 2013. "Management consultants and the United States’ public sector," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 381-399, October.
    6. Catherine Sirois, 2023. "Contested by the State: Institutional Offloading in the Case of Crossover Youth," American Sociological Review, , vol. 88(2), pages 350-377, April.
    7. Walter, Timo & Wansleben, Leon, 2018. "How Central Bankers Learned to Love Financialization: The Fed, the Bank, and the Enlisting of Unfettered Markets in the Conduct of Monetary Policy," OSF Preprints gzyp6, Center for Open Science.
    8. Klimczuk, Andrzej & Tomczyk, Łukasz (ed.), 2017. "Selected Contemporary Challenges of Ageing Policy," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, volume 0, number 174882, March.
    9. Hlebec, Valentina & Rakar, Tatjana, 2017. "Ageing Policies in Slovenia: Before and After “Austerity”," MPRA Paper 84646, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Pamela Herd & Donald Moynihan, 2023. "Fewer Burdens but Greater Inequality? Reevaluating the Safety Net through the Lens of Administrative Burden," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 706(1), pages 94-117, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:89:y:2024:i:5:p:907-936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.