IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rvr/journl/20129756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Continuités et ruptures dans l’accumulation et la régulation en Amérique latine dans les années 2000 : le cas de l’Argentine, du Brésil et du Chili

Author

Listed:
  • Miotti, Egidio Luis
  • Quenan, Carlos
  • Zane, Edgardo Torija

Abstract

Après avoir rappelé les traits marquants permettant de caractériser l’évolution globale des économies latino-américaines, ce travail examine les principales transformations intervenues au niveau des formes institutionnelles et des régimes d’accumulation en Argentine, Brésil et Chili pendant les années 2000. Dans le sillage d’un nouveau cycle de croissance associé à une évolution favorable des termes de l’échange et au boom des exportations vers la Chine, l’analyse des cas permet d’identifier une grande diversité de trajectoires nationales. En Argentine, les transformations les plus marquées suite à la crise de 2001 se situent au niveau de la déconnexion croissante de l’économie à l’égard de la finance internationale et de la participation croissante de l’État dans la régulation d’ensemble. En ce qui concerne le Brésil, le processus de financiarisation de l’économie amorcé dans les années 1990 a conféré un rôle décisif au régime monétaire dans le mode de régulation bien que l’État renforce sa présence au sein des formes institutionnelles dans les années 2000. Le Chili, pour sa part, connaît, dans le cadre d’un mode de régulation stabilisé, un affaiblissement du dynamisme de l’activité économique, mettant en évidence les limites de l’accumulation extensive.Même si les sources de vulnérabilité diffèrent selon les pays, tous les trois sont sensibles à un éventuel retournement des prix des exportations primaires. En même temps, les trois pays analysés partagent le risque de subir les effets de « maladie hollandaise » pénalisant la diversification productive et l’emploi.

Suggested Citation

  • Miotti, Egidio Luis & Quenan, Carlos & Zane, Edgardo Torija, 2012. "Continuités et ruptures dans l’accumulation et la régulation en Amérique latine dans les années 2000 : le cas de l’Argentine, du Brésil et du Chili," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 11.
    • Handle: RePEc:rvr:journl:2012:9756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://regulation.revues.org/9756
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://regulation.revues.org/pdf/9756
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William S. Sessions, 1990. "Washington," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 57-59, July.
    2. repec:idb:brikps:62498 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Lourdes Casanova & Andrea Golstein & André Almeida & Matthew Fraser & Ramón Molina & Henning Hoeber & Carlos Arruda, 2009. "Multilatinas to Global Latinas: The New Latin American Multinationals," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 62498, February.
    4. Ocampo, José Antonio, 1998. "Más allá del Consenso de Washington: una visión desde la CEPAL," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cohen, Joseph N., 2008. "Managing the Faustian bargain: monetary autonomy in the pursuit of development in Eastern Europe and Latin America," MPRA Paper 22435, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Cohen, Joseph N, 2010. "Neoliberalism’s relationship with economic growth in the developing world: Was it the power of the market or the resolution of financial crisis?," MPRA Paper 24527, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6761 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Segura-Bonilla, Olman, 2003. "Competitiveness, systems of innovation and the learning economy: the forest sector in Costa Rica," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 373-384, December.
    5. Abdourahmane Ndiaye, 2008. "Économie solidaire, insertion et marchés transitionnels du travail territorialisés. Quelques conclusions tirées de l'étude de cas du PLIE des Graves," Post-Print halshs-00596749, HAL.
    6. Kilby, Christopher, 2005. "World Bank lending and regulation," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 384-407, December.
    7. Sławomir Bukowski, 2011. "Economic and Monetary Union – Current Fiscal Disturbances and the Future," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 17(3), pages 274-287, August.
    8. De la Torre, Augusto & Schmukler, Sergio, 2007. "Emerging Capital Markets and Globalization: The Latin American Experience," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 349, December.
    9. Pierre Malgrange & Patrick Plane, 2008. "Économie du développement et de la transition : présentation générale," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 0(5), pages 1-10.
    10. Dreher, Axel & Nunnenkamp, Peter & Thiele, Rainer, 2011. "Are ‘New’ Donors Different? Comparing the Allocation of Bilateral Aid Between nonDAC and DAC Donor Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 1950-1968.
    11. Zezza, Alberto & Llambi, Luis, 2002. "Meso-Economic Filters Along the Policy Chain: Understanding the Links Between Policy Reforms and Rural Poverty in Latin America," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 1865-1884, November.
    12. Francesco Saraceno, 2016. "The ECB: a reluctant leading character of the EMU play," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(2), pages 129-151, August.
    13. Noland, Marcus & Son, Hyun H., 2012. "Editors’ introduction transitional economies: Progress and pitfalls," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 107-110.
    14. Csaba Lentner, 2015. "The Structural Outline of the Development and Consolidation of Retail Foreign Currency Lending," Public Finance Quarterly, State Audit Office of Hungary, vol. 60(3), pages 297-311.
    15. Blaise Gnimassoun, 2017. "Exchange rate misalignments and the external balance under a pegged currency system," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(5), pages 949-974, November.
    16. Diego Bastourre & Luis Casanova & Alejo Espora, 2011. "Tipo de Cambio Real y Crecimiento: Síntesis de la Evidencia y Agenda de Investigación," Department of Economics, Working Papers 082, Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    17. Ivanenko, Vlad, 2004. "Searching for the value-subtraction in the Russian economy," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 88-104, March.
    18. Malhotra, Shavin & Lin, Xiaohua & Farrell, Carlyle, 2016. "Cross-national uncertainty and level of control in cross-border acquisitions: A comparison of Latin American and U.S. multinationals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1993-2004.
    19. Jean-Paul Fitoussi & Francesco Saraceno, 2004. "The Brussels-Frankfurt-Washington Consensus. Old and New Tradeoffs in Economics," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2004-02, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    20. Mtro. José Satsumi López-Morales & Dr. Jorge Alberto Wise-Lozano & Josè G. Vargas-Hernà ndez, M.B.A, Ph.D., 2014. "Emerging Multinationals: Multilatinas," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 4(4), pages 136-145, April.
    21. David Hulme, 2013. "Poverty and development thinking:synthesis or uneasy compromise?," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 18013, GDI, The University of Manchester.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Amérique latine; changements institutionnels; crise; régimes d’accumulation; résilience; crisis; institutional changes; Latin America; Regimes of Accumulation; resilience; América Latina; cambios institucionales; crisis; Regímenes de acumulación; resiliencia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B5 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches
    • P52 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - Comparative Studies of Particular Economies
    • O54 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Latin America; Caribbean

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rvr:journl:2012:9756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pascal Seppecher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://theorie-regulation.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.