IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rss/jnljbs/v1i1p5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Manufacturing SMEs and Macroeconomic Indicators: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Ganiyu Biodun Bakare

Abstract

Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) have been shown to be relevant in sustaining desirable macroeconomic indicators in many economies. This aroused the curiosity to examine the manufacturing SMEs in relation to selected macroeconomic indicators and, thus, contribute to literature and the quest for appropriate SME sector-oriented policies and programmes in Nigeria. The study employed empirical method of analysis on secondary data via a time series research design. Data were sourced from the Statistical Bulletin of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Annual Abstract of Statistics of the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). Hence, the SMEs considered were those whose contributions to the selected macroeconomic indicators were published in the data sources. The analysis was anchored on an analytical model that expressed economic growth indicator (GDP) in terms manufacturing SMEs’ contributions to employment (MSCEMP), gross domestic product (MSSGDP) and exports (MSCEXP). From the proposition of no significant effects of the contributions, the SMEs were analysed in the relation to the indicators. Results showed that while the SMEs made positive contributions to the indicators, significance was established only for SGDP at the 0.05 level of significance (p-value 0.0167). However, significance was also established for aggregate effect of the SMEs’ contributions to the indicators as evidenced by the F-statistic p-value of 0.001347. Further, the model proved good fit at 87.9% explanatory power as evidenced by the R-Squared of 0.879486. The study concluded manufacturing SMEs are sine qua non for sustaining desirable macroeconomic indicators in Nigeria. Consequently, the study emphasised the need for the SMEs to be more export-oriented to drive international markets penetration and global competitiveness. The study also recommended appropriate SME-oriented policies and programmes to drive sustainable growth, development, favourable balances of trade and payments to foster international liquidity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ganiyu Biodun Bakare, 2015. "Manufacturing SMEs and Macroeconomic Indicators: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria," Quarterly Journal of Business Studies, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 45-54.
    • Handle: RePEc:rss:jnljbs:v1i1p5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rassweb.org/admin/pages/ResearchPapers/Paper%205_1495887320.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Okwu Andy Titus & Obiakor Rowland Tochukwu & Obiwuru Timothy Chidi, 2013. "Relevance of Small and Medium Enterprises in the Nigerian Economy: A Benchmarking Analysis," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 1(5), pages 167-177.
    2. Aghion, Philippe & Howitt, Peter, 1992. "A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 323-351, March.
    3. Yoguel, Gabriel & Milesi, Darío & Moori Koenig, Virginia & Robert, Verónica, 2007. "Developing competitive advantages: successful export SMEs in Argentina, Chile and Colombia," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), August.
    4. repec:aer:wpaper:16 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chu, Angus C. & Cozzi, Guido & Furukawa, Yuichi, 2016. "Unions, innovation and cross-country wage inequality," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 104-118.
    2. Heijs, Joost, 2003. "Freerider behaviour and the public finance of R&D activities in enterprises: the case of the Spanish low interest credits for R&D," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 445-461, March.
    3. Kawalec Paweł, 2020. "The dynamics of theories of economic growth: An impact of Unified Growth Theory," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 19-44, June.
    4. Gilberto Tadeu Lima, 2000. "Market concentration and technological innovation in a dynamic model of growth and distribution," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 447-475.
    5. Loebbing, Jonas, 2018. "An Elementary Theory of Endogenous Technical Change and Wage Inequality," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181603, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Grimaud, Andre & Rouge, Luc, 2003. "Non-renewable resources and growth with vertical innovations: optimum, equilibrium and economic policies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2, Supple), pages 433-453, March.
    7. Liliana Meza-González & Jaime Marie Sepulveda, 2019. "The impact of competition with China in the US market on innovation in Mexican manufacturing firms," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 28(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. van de Klundert, T.C.M.J. & Smulders, J.A., 1991. "Reconstructing growth theory : A survey," Other publications TiSEM 19355c51-17eb-4d5d-aa66-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Patrick Legros & Andrew F. Newman & Eugenio Proto, 2014. "Smithian Growth through Creative Organization," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 96(5), pages 796-811, December.
    10. Tung Liu & Kui-Wai Li, 2008. "Revisiting Solow’s Decomposition of Economic and Productivity Growth," Working Papers 200805, Ball State University, Department of Economics, revised Dec 2008.
    11. Bruneel, Johan & Clarysse, Bart & Bobelyn, Annelies & Wright, Mike, 2020. "Liquidity events and VC-backed academic spin-offs: The role of search alliances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(10).
    12. Karlsson, Martin & Nilsson, Therese & Pichler, Stefan, 2012. "What Doesn't Kill You Makes You Stronger? The Impact of the 1918 Spanish Flu Epidemic on Economic Performance in Sweden," Working Paper Series 911, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    13. Patricia Crifo & Etienne Lehmann, 2001. "Why the Kuznets Curve Will Always Reverse," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00150324, HAL.
    14. Guido Cozzi, 2009. "Intellectual Property, Innovation, And Growth: Introduction To The Special Issue," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 56(4), pages 383-389, September.
    15. Wilson, E.J. & Chaudhri, D.P., 2000. "Endogeneity, Knowledge and Dynamics of Long Run Capitalist Economic Growth," Economics Working Papers wp00-03, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
    16. Foellmi, Reto & Wuergler, Tobias & Zweimüller, Josef, 2014. "The macroeconomics of Model T," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 617-647.
    17. Grimaud, Andre & Rouge, Luc, 2005. "Polluting non-renewable resources, innovation and growth: welfare and environmental policy," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 109-129, June.
    18. V. Vandenberghe, 2018. "The Contribution of Educated Workers to Firms’ Efficiency Gains: The Key Role of Proximity to the ‘Local’ Frontier," De Economist, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 259-283, September.
    19. Chu, Angus C. & Pan, Shiyuan, 2013. "The Escape-Infringement Effect Of Blocking Patents On Innovation And Economic Growth," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(4), pages 955-969, June.
    20. Alison Butler & Michael R. Pakko, 1998. "R&D spending and cyclical fluctuations: putting the \"technology\" in technology shocks," Working Papers 1998-020, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rss:jnljbs:v1i1p5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Danish Khalil (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rassweb.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.