IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsr/journl/v62y2014i2p95-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological considerations on the size of Coefficient of Intensity of Structural Changes (CISC)

Author

Listed:
  • Florin Marius Pavelescu

    (Institute of National Economy)

Abstract

The paper brings arguments in favour of emphasizing the modeling factors of the Coefficient of Intensity of Structural Changes (CISC) in order to obtain a better interpretation of the significance of the respective method of structural change measurement. Also, it is highlighted the impact of characteristic features of structural changes on differentiation of the size of CISC computed at economic branch level and sectorial level respectively. There are identified all possible situations of structural changes from a sectorial point of view. At the end of the paper, there is presented a numerical example related to structural changes of Romania’s employed population during the period 2008-2011. The above-mentioned example offers an opportunity to review all the necessary steps for identification of CISC modeling factors, when economic branches approach is considered, and a comparison with CISC computed in a sectorial vision is made. The respective steps were made by using R Software.

Suggested Citation

  • Florin Marius Pavelescu, 2014. "Methodological considerations on the size of Coefficient of Intensity of Structural Changes (CISC)," Romanian Statistical Review, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 62(2), pages 95-107, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rsr:journl:v:62:y:2014:i:2:p:95-107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistadestatistica.ro/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/RRS_2_2014_a09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dobrescu, Emilian, 2009. "Measuring the Interaction of Structural Changes with Inflation," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 6(5), pages 5-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mihail Busu & Madalina Vanesa Vargas & Sorin Anagnoste, 2023. "Navigating the Intricate Relationship between Investments and Global Output: A Leontief Matrix Case Study of Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Dobrescu, Emilian, 2013. "Modelling the Sectoral Structure of the Final Output," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 59-89, October.
    3. Emilian Dobrescu & Viorel Gaftea, 2012. "On the Accuracy of RAS Method in an Emergent Economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(32), pages 502-521, June.
    4. Saman, Corina & Pauna, Bianca, 2013. "New Keynesian Phillips Curve for Romania," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 159-171, June.
    5. Dospinescu, Andrei Silviu & Mitrofan, Maria, 2013. "The Interaction Of Structural Changes With Inflation in the Presence of Symetric and Asymetric Economic Behaviours – Evidence from a General Dynamic Intersectoral Model," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 87-100, June.
    6. Emilian Dobrescu, 2013. "Restatement of the I-O Coefficient Stability Problem," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 2(1), pages 1-67, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    informational energy; intrasectorial structural changes; main and secondary sense of sectorial structural change; transfer of weights;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics
    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsr:journl:v:62:y:2014:i:2:p:95-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adrian Visoiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.