IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/terumm/v17y2022i4p52-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ANALYSIS OF GREEN SPACES IN THE REGIONS OF SHIRAZ METROPOLIS, IRAN Abstract: Urban parks and green spaces are considered among the most fundamental factors of sustainability in the accelerating growth of urbanism; and if they are managed and planned productively, they would have useful effects on improving the citizens’ physical and emotional health and on improving views of cities; they would also play a vital role on improving life quality and health of citizens. This survey has been conducted using Merec and Codas techniques with the objective of studying and analyzing parks and green spaces in the Regions of city of Shiraz. The scope of research includes the Regions of Shiraz in 2019 and the required data was taken from the Statistical Yearbook of Shiraz in 2019. Its data has been weighted using Merec technique and has been used in Codas. The survey results achieved by the use of Codas technique show that Region10 of the metropolis of Shiraz by achieving 3.498 has the highest number of parks and green spaces. After region10 in this city, region4 can be mentioned with the score 2.013. Region 3 with 1.776, region6 with 0.938, and region9 with the score 0.404 have achieved approximately high scores. Other regions of the city of Shiraz achieved low scores, and region8 of this metropolis with -3.167 had the lowest score. Region 8 which is considered to be the historical and cultural context of the city of Shiraz includes the lowest per capita of green spaces in the urban projects, and this can be observed in Codas technique

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmood AKBARI

    (University of Yasouj)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmood AKBARI, 2022. "ANALYSIS OF GREEN SPACES IN THE REGIONS OF SHIRAZ METROPOLIS, IRAN Abstract: Urban parks and green spaces are considered among the most fundamental factors of sustainability in the accelerating growth," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(4), pages 52-67, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:52-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://um.ase.ro/no174/4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jason Byrne & Jennifer Wolch & Jin Zhang, 2009. "Planning for environmental justice in an urban national park," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(3), pages 365-392.
    2. Li, Zhiming & Fan, Zhengxi & Song, Yan & Chai, Yangbo, 2021. "Assessing equity in park accessibility using a travel behavior-based G2SFCA method in Nanjing, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Michelle Farfán Gutiérrez & Andrew Boni Noguez & Alejandro Flamenco-Sandoval & Ayesa Martínez Serrano & Arnoldo Flores-Torres & Ana Karen Godínez Ramírez & Camilo Alcántara, 2021. "Availability and accessibility of urban green spaces: the case of the urban zone of Queretaro Metropolitan Area, Mexico," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 101-105, January.
    4. Wen Wu & Kewei Ding, 2022. "Optimization Strategy for Parks and Green Spaces in Shenyang City: Improving the Supply Quality and Accessibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Hongxu Guo & Zhuoqiao Luo & Mengtian Li & Shumin Kong & Haiyan Jiang, 2022. "A Literature Review of Big Data-Based Urban Park Research in Visitor Dimension," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Na & Tian, Qingsong & Cui, Mengying & He, Mingwei, 2023. "A delicacy evaluation method for park walkability considering multidimensional quality heterogeneity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Veerkamp, Clara J. & Schipper, Aafke M. & Hedlund, Katarina & Lazarova, Tanya & Nordin, Amanda & Hanson, Helena I., 2021. "A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    3. Dan He & Zixuan Chen & Shaowei Ai & Jing Zhou & Linlin Lu & Ting Yang, 2021. "The Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Urban Cultural and Entertainment Facilities in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Li, Chuanyao & Wang, Junren, 2022. "A hierarchical two-step floating catchment area analysis for high-tier hospital accessibility in an urban agglomeration region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Jessica Debats Garrison, 2019. "Seeing the park for the trees: New York’s “Million Trees†campaign vs. the deep roots of environmental inequality," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(5), pages 914-930, June.
    6. Ji, Wei & Huang, Zhengfeng & Gao, Gao & Zheng, Pengjun, 2024. "Evaluation of integrated transport efficiency and equity at the county level——taking the counties in ningbo city as an example," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 257-272.
    7. Karimpour, Abolfazl & Hosseinzadeh, Aryan & Kluger, Robert, 2023. "A data-driven approach to estimating dockless electric scooter service areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    8. Wei XIAOHUI & Nurhayati Abdul MALEK & Salina MOHAMED ALI, 2024. "The Impact Of Sustainable Development Goals On Urban Green Space: A Bibliometric Analysis Of The Literature," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(3), pages 31-48, August.
    9. Nilanjan Bhor & Dhananjayan Mayavel, 2024. "The Socio-Spatial Distribution and Equity of Access to Urban Parks: A Case Study of Bengaluru, India," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Adriano Bressane & Maria Eduarda Guedes Ferreira & Ana Júlia da Silva Garcia & Líliam César de Castro Medeiros, 2024. "Is Having Urban Green Space in the Neighborhood Enough to Make a Difference? Insights for Healthier City Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-13, July.
    11. He, Jialin & Yi, Hongmei & Liu, Jian, 2016. "Urban green space recreational service assessment and management: A conceptual model based on the service generation process," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 59-68.
    12. Tianrong Xu & Nikmatul Adha Nordin & Ainoriza Mohd Aini, 2022. "Urban Green Space and Subjective Well-Being of Older People: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-29, October.
    13. Yuliang Jiang & Yufeng Yang, 2022. "Environmental Justice in Greater Los Angeles: Impacts of Spatial and Ethnic Factors on Residents’ Socioeconomic and Health Status," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-26, April.
    14. Bo-Xun Huang & Wen-Ying Li & Wen-Juan Ma & Hua Xiao, 2023. "Space Accessibility and Equity of Urban Green Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-33, March.
    15. Bo-Sin Tang & Kenneth KH Wong & Kenneth SS Tang & Siu Wai Wong, 2021. "Walking accessibility to neighbourhood open space in a multi-level urban environment of Hong Kong," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1340-1356, June.
    16. Duy Thinh Do & Suguru Mori & Rie Nomura, 2019. "A Comparative Study of User Behaviors on Unimproved and Improved Street Spaces in Da Nang, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Xiang Feng & Qian Peng & Yunnan Chen & Weiyue Li, 2022. "A Case Study of the Snow Leopard in Sanjiangyuan National Park Boundaries regarding Park Boundary Divergence," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Buchel, Sophie & Frantzeskaki, Niki, 2015. "Citizens’ voice: A case study about perceived ecosystem services by urban park users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 169-177.
    19. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Sajadi, Afshin, 2024. "Principles of just urban land use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    20. Kimberly J. Coleman & Elizabeth E. Perry & Dominik Thom & Tatiana M. Gladkikh & William S. Keeton & Peter W. Clark & Ralph E. Tursini & Kimberly F. Wallin, 2020. "The Woods around the Ivory Tower: A Systematic Review Examining the Value and Relevance of School Forests in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:52-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.