IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rmcimn/v13y2012i3p387-393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Information - Requirement of Deposit Guarantee Schemes

Author

Listed:
  • Nadia Elena SANDULESCU

    (West University, Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

Deposit guarantee schemes are organized in order to protect depositors of credit institutions which have not the means to find out about their financial situation, and also to increase banking system stability by avoiding massive withdrawals from credit institutions which appear on suspicion of financial problems. But the mission of such a scheme can’t be satisfied in the absence of proper organization activity of public information on deposit insurance parameters. Trust is an important parameter that is critical for the functionality and performances of the financial sector and for the deposit guarantee schemes. But we don’t have to forget that trust is a fragile element and it has to be permanently strengthened by all the institutions and stakeholders that are acting in the financial market.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadia Elena SANDULESCU, 2012. "Public Information - Requirement of Deposit Guarantee Schemes," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(3), pages 387-393, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:13:y:2012:i:3:p:387-393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rmci.ase.ro/no13vol3/04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oberg, Achim & Walgenbach, Peter, 2008. "Hierarchical structures of communication in a network organization," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 183-198, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kai Riemer & Stefan Stieglitz & Christian Meske, 2015. "From Top to Bottom," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(3), pages 197-212, June.
    2. Ghulam Mustafa & Hans Solli-Sæther & Virginia Bodolica & Jon Ivar Håvold & Anam Ilyas, 2022. "Digitalization trends and organizational structure: bureaucracy, ambidexterity or post-bureaucracy?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(4), pages 671-694, December.
    3. Wonder Agbenyo & Yuansheng Jiang & Prince Komla Cobblah, 2018. "Assessment of Government Internal Control Systems on Financial Reporting Quality in Ghana: A Case Study of Ghana Revenue Authority," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(11), pages 1-40, November.
    4. Guido Fioretti, 2012. "Two measures of organizational flexibility," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 957-979, November.
    5. Thomas Diefenbach, 2011. "When does Superiors’ Deviance threaten Organisational Hierarchy?," Working Papers 27, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    6. Marcel Maurer & Norbert Bach & Simon Oertel, 2023. "Changes in formal structure towards self-managing organization and their effects on the intra-organizational communication network," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(3), pages 83-98, September.
    7. Dischner, Simon, 2015. "Organizational structure, organizational form, and counterproductive work behavior: A competitive test of the bureaucratic and post-bureaucratic views," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 501-514.
    8. Sun, Zhentian & Li, Xuhong & Qiao, Wenxin & Haghani, Ali, 2013. "Entropy-based performance evaluation on institutional structures of trunk highway management—Case study in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 85-91.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    deposit insurance; public communication; guaranteed ceiling; compensations’payments.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:13:y:2012:i:3:p:387-393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marian Nastase (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.