IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mrpase/v4y2012i4p47-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance Mechanisms And Organizational Innovation Within The Textile Industry And Textile Products

Author

Listed:
  • Monica DUDIAN

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Piata Romana 6, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The objective of this article is to identify the possibilities of organizational innovation at micro-economic level and industry level, in order to ensure the long term viability of this domain in Romania. To achieve the above mentioned objective, there has been studied and analyzed the reference literature for the organizational forms and strategic solutions from the textile industry, applied since 1930 up to present days, in representative countries for this sector. Afterwards, given the current overall situation of the textile industry, there has been set potential strategically solutions appropriate for Romania. Historical experience suggests two directions of change in the textile industry of Romania: (1) changes within the organizational structures; (2) new strategically directions of the enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica DUDIAN, 2012. "Governance Mechanisms And Organizational Innovation Within The Textile Industry And Textile Products," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(4), pages 47-55, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:4:y:2012:i:4:p:47-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mrp.ase.ro/no44/f6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Udo Staber, 2001. "Spatial Proximity and Firm Survival in a Declining Industrial District: The Case of Knitwear Firms in Baden-Wu¨rttemberg," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 329-341.
    2. Jean-Marie Chevalier, 1991. "Éléments de réflexion stratégique sur la filière textile," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 56(1), pages 27-45.
    3. Monica DUDIAN & Liliana CRACIUN, 2011. "Industrial Agglomerations and Clusters. The Textile and Textile Products Industry from Romania," Economia. Seria Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 40-51, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Doina I. POPESCU, 2013. "Servicing The Market Niche €“ A Possible Solution For The Maintenance And/Or Success Of The Firm On The Market In The Context Of The Global Economic Crisis," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 5(1), pages 79-96, March.
    2. Shah Mehmood WAGAN, 2015. "Export boost of textile industry of Pakistan by availing EU’s GSP Plus," Journal of Economics Library, KSP Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 18-27, March.
    3. Wagan, Shah Mehmood, 2015. "Export boost of Textile Industry of Pakistan by availing EU’s GSP Plus," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 18-27.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doina I. POPESCU, 2013. "Servicing The Market Niche €“ A Possible Solution For The Maintenance And/Or Success Of The Firm On The Market In The Context Of The Global Economic Crisis," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 5(1), pages 79-96, March.
    2. María José Ruiz-Ortega & Gloria Parra-Requena & Pedro Manuel García-Villaverde, 2016. "Do Territorial Agglomerations Still Provide Competitive Advantages? A Study of Social Capital, Innovation, and Knowledge," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 39(3), pages 259-290, July.
    3. Ariel Mendez & Delphine Mercier, 2007. "Territorial Dynamics and History Imprint : Two french Clusters in Transition in the South East Region," Working Papers halshs-00360764, HAL.
    4. Sam Tavassoli & Viroj Jienwatcharamongkhol & Pia Arenius, 2023. "Colocation of Entrepreneurs and New Firm Survival: Role of New Firm Founder’s Experiential Relatedness to Local Entrepreneurs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(4), pages 1421-1459, July.
    5. Deltas, George & De Silva, Dakshina G. & McComb, Robert P., 2014. "Industrial Agglomeration and Spatial Persistence: Entry, Growth, and Exit of Software Publishers," MPRA Paper 58751, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Henri L.F. de Groot & Jacques Poot & Martijn J. Smit, 2007. "Agglomeration, Innovation and Regional Development: Theoretical Perspectives and Meta-Analysis," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 07-079/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    7. H.D. Watts & A.M. Wood & P. Wardle, 2003. "'Making Friends or Making Things?': Interfirm Transactions in the Sheffield Metal-working Cluster," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(3), pages 615-630, March.
    8. Francisco Puig & Belen Garcia-Mora & Cristina Santamaria, 2011. "Survival of the firm and territory," ERSA conference papers ersa11p197, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Ron Boschma, 2015. "Do spinoff dynamics or agglomeration externalities drive industry clustering? A reappraisal of Steven Klepper’s work," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 24(4), pages 859-873.
    10. Martijn J. Smit & Maria A. Abreu & Henri L.F. Groot, 2015. "Micro-evidence on the determinants of innovation in the Netherlands: The relative importance of absorptive capacity and agglomeration externalities," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(2), pages 249-272, June.
    11. Anet Weterings & Orietta Marsili, 2015. "Spatial Concentration of Industries and New Firm Exits: Does this Relationship Differ between Exits by Closure and by M&A?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 44-58, January.
    12. Andrew Atherton, 2003. "Examining Clusters Formation from the ‘Bottom-up’: An Analysis of four Cases in the North of England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 21(1), pages 21-35, February.
    13. Carla Daniela Calá & Miguel Manjón-Antolín & Josep-Maria Arauzo-Carod, 2017. "Regional Determinants of Exit Across Firms’ Size: Evidence from Argentina," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(6), pages 768-785, December.
    14. Baumöhl, Eduard & Iwasaki, Ichiro & Kočenda, Evžen, 2020. "Firm survival in new EU member states," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(1).
    15. Schøtt, Thomas & Jensen, Kent Wickstrøm, 2016. "Firms’ innovation benefiting from networking and institutional support: A global analysis of national and firm effects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1233-1246.
    16. Stepan Zemtsov & Vera Barinova & Alexey Pankratov & Evgeniy Kutsenko, 2016. "Potential High-Tech Ñlusters in Russian Regions: From Current Policy to New Growth Areas," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 10(3), pages 34-52.
    17. Ron Boschma & Koen Frenken, 2011. "The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 295-307, March.
    18. Cheng Shu & Sharon A. Simmons, 2018. "Firm survival in traded industries: does localization moderate the effects of founding team experience?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 643-655, March.
    19. George Deltas & Dakshina De Silva & Robert P. McComb, 2015. "Industrial agglomeration and spatial persistence of employment in software publishing," Working Papers 85393182, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    20. Guo, Di & Jiang, Kun & Xu, Chenggang & Yang, Xiyi, 2023. "Geographic clusters, regional productivity and resource reallocation across firms: Evidence from China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:4:y:2012:i:4:p:47-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.