IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v13y2019i1p187-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research On The Impact Of Digitization Upon Work Flexibility: Example From The European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Dan POPESCU
  • Cãtãlina PICU
  • Raluca MAREI (OZARCHIEVICI)
  • Constantin-Iulian TÃNA?CU

Abstract

Technology is big influencer that has transformed the way work is being carried out today, triggering the development of numerous alternatives to the traditional fixed work schedules. Over the past ten years, more and more companies, from small to large-sized ones have decided to introduce new forms of employment, in order to attract and retain employees and to maintain focus on their core competitive functions. The objective of this study is to determine the main dependencies between the progress made in information and communication technologies and the sustainability of new work types, such as homeworking, with various examples from the European Union. A comparative analysis was conducted by the authors on the investment of enterprises in building digital skills for their personnel. Also the research will emphasize the importance of digital skills development, considering that the benefits of having a well-equipped workforce will help companies maintain a competitive advantage on the market, by extending their business and further reinvesting their profit in research and innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan POPESCU & Cãtãlina PICU & Raluca MAREI (OZARCHIEVICI) & Constantin-Iulian TÃNA?CU, 2019. "Research On The Impact Of Digitization Upon Work Flexibility: Example From The European Union," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 187-196, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:187-196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2019/pdf/1_19.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thor Berger & Carl Benedikt Frey, 2016. "Structural Transformation in the OECD: Digitalisation, Deindustrialisation and the Future of Work," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 193, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yauheniya Barkun & Ewa Glińska & Katarzyna Dębkowska, 2021. "Differentiation of regional attractiveness for gaining talents in the context of place branding theory," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(1), pages 78-92, March.
    2. Sandra M. Leitner & Robert Stehrer, 2019. "The Automatisation Challenge Meets the Demographic Challenge: In Need of Higher Productivity Growth," wiiw Working Papers 171, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    3. Francesco Gangi & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele & Nicola Varrone, 2021. "Assessing the impact of socially responsible human resources management on company environmental performance and cost of debt," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1511-1527, September.
    4. Mathilde Aubouin, 2023. "Determinants of the Digital Divide: Evidence from France," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 151, pages 37-80.
    5. Peter Tyler & Emil Evenhuis & Ron Martin & Peter Sunley & Ben Gardiner, 2017. "Growing apart? Structural transformation and the uneven development of British cities," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(3), pages 425-454.
    6. Foster-McGregor, Neil & Nomaler, Önder & Verspagen, Bart, 2021. "Job Automation Risk, Economic Structure and Trade: a European Perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    7. Heimerl, Veronika & Raza, Werner, 2018. "Digitalization and development cooperation: An assessment of the debate and its implications for policy," Briefing Papers 19, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE).
    8. I. V. Novikova, 2018. "Strategic management of labor resources," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, vol. 11(4).
    9. Bobeica, Elena & Koester, Gerrit & Lis, Eliza & Nickel, Christiane & Porqueddu, Mario, 2019. "Understanding low wage growth in the euro area and European countries," Occasional Paper Series 232, European Central Bank.
    10. Thonipara, Anita & Sternberg, Rolf G. & Proeger, Till & Haefner, Lukas, 2020. "Assessing the Digital Divide and its Regional Determinants: Evidence from a Web-Scraping Analysis," ifh Working Papers 25/2020, Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh), revised 2020.
    11. Flavio Calvino & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2018. "The Innovation†Employment Nexus: A Critical Survey Of Theory And Empirics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 83-117, February.
    12. Maarten Goos & Melanie Arntz & Ulrich Zierahn & Terry Gregory & Stephanie Carretero Gomez & Ignacio Gonzalez Vazquez & Koen Jonkers, 2019. "The Impact of Technological Innovation on the Future of Work," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2019-03, Joint Research Centre.
    13. Daniel Chrisendo & Hermanto Siregar & Matin Qaim, 2021. "Oil palm and structural transformation of agriculture in Indonesia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(5), pages 849-862, September.
    14. Brendan Burchell & Darja Reuschke & Mary Zhang, 2021. "Spatial and temporal segmenting of urban workplaces: The gendering of multi-locational working," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(11), pages 2207-2232, August.
    15. Chagelishvili Ana, 2021. "The Contribution of Emotional Intelligence to Human Resource Development and Career Success: a Review," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 7, ejes_v7_i.
    16. Lara C. Roll & Hans De Witte & Hai-Jiang Wang, 2023. "Conceptualization and Validation of the Occupation Insecurity Scale (OCIS): Measuring Employees’ Occupation Insecurity Due to Automation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-26, January.
    17. Aepli, Manuel, 2019. "Technological change and occupation mobility: A task-based approach to horizontal mismatch," GLO Discussion Paper Series 361, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    18. Vida Lang & Andrej Šorgo, 2024. "Views of Students, Parents, and Teachers on Smartphones and Tablets in the Development of 21st-Century Skills as a Prerequisite for a Sustainable Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:187-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.