IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/ep1602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the results of scientific workers: the experience of New Zealand
[Оценка Результатов Деятельности Научных Работников: Опыт Новой Зеландии]

Author

Listed:
  • Fokina, Tatiana (Фокина, Татьяна)

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University)

Abstract

Due to the growing importance of science for the economy and hard budget constraints in Russia the issue of increasing the efficiency of public funding of research activities is becoming increasingly urgent. The planned transition to a system of effective contracts in science requires regular assessment of the scientific staff's performance, resulting in the need for such an assessment methodology. As part of this article presents an analysis of the individual evaluation of researchers working in the OECD results on the example of New Zealand's experience of the countries and the ways to apply this experience in Russia in the development of methodology for assessing the performance of researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Fokina, Tatiana (Фокина, Татьяна), 2016. "Evaluation of the results of scientific workers: the experience of New Zealand [Оценка Результатов Деятельности Научных Работников: Опыт Новой Зеландии]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 143-156, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/ep1602.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David L. Anderson & John Tressler, 2013. "The New Zealand performance-based research fund and its impact on publication activity in economics," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Гершман Михаил Анатольевич & Кузнецова Татьяна Евгеньевна, 2013. "Эффективный Контракт В Науке: Параметры Модели," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 7(3), pages 026-037.
    3. Damien Sauze & Hélène Sultan-Taïeb, 2010. "Interim Report for France”, Health at Work project European Commission - 7ème PCRDT « An Inquiry into the Health and Safety at Work: a European Union Perspective," Post-Print halshs-01232496, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buckle, Robert A. & Creedy, John & Ball, Ashley, 2020. "A Schumpeterian Gale: Using Longitudinal Data to Evaluate Responses to Performance-Based Research Funding Systems," Working Paper Series 9447, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    2. David I Stern, 2014. "High-Ranked Social Science Journal Articles Can Be Identified from Early Citation Information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Robert A. Buckle & John Creedy & Norman Gemmell, 2020. "Is external research assessment associated with convergence or divergence of research quality across universities and disciplines? Evidence from the PBRF process in New Zealand," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(36), pages 3919-3932, July.
    4. Robert A. Buckle and John Creedy, 2018. "The Impact on Research Quality of Performance-Based Funding: The Case of New Zealand’s PBRF Scheme," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 25-48.
    5. Robert A. Buckle & John Creedy, 2019. "The evolution of research quality in New Zealand universities as measured by the performance-based research fund process," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 144-165, May.
    6. Robert A. Buckle and John Creedy, 2018. "The Impact on Research Quality of Performance-Based Funding: The Case of New Zealand’s PBRF Scheme," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 25-48.
    7. Stephan B. Bruns & David I. Stern, 2016. "Research assessment using early citation information," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(2), pages 917-935, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    scientist; research activities; public financing of R & D; effective contract; an individual assessment of research quality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    • H59 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Other
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:ep1602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.