IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rje/bellje/v13y1982ispringp219-224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Advantages and Information Acquisition

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas R. Palfrey

Abstract

In some competitive situations under uncertainty, less risk averse competitors have an advantage over more risk averse opponents. Private information acquisition by the advantaged players diminishes this advantage by reducing the risk faced by their opponents in a Nash equilibrium. This tradeoff between risk advantages and informational advantages is examined in the context of a duopoly model with uncertain demand. It is found that private information acquisition may reduce the risk advantage by so much that the overall effect is to make the informed, less risk averse competitor worse off and the uninformed, more risk averse competitor better off.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas R. Palfrey, 1982. "Risk Advantages and Information Acquisition," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 13(1), pages 219-224, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:13:y:1982:i:spring:p:219-224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0361-915X%28198221%2913%3A1%3C219%3ARAAIA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-X&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qihong Liu Konstantinos Serfes, 2001. "Endogenous Acquisition Of Information On Consumer Willingness To Pay In A Product Differentiated Duopoly," Industrial Organization 0110001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Eldor, Rafael & Zilcha, Itzhak, 1990. "Oligopoly, uncertain demand, and forward markets," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 17-26, February.
    3. Stickel, Eberhard, 2001. "Uncertainty reduction in a competitive environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 169-177, March.
    4. Russell Golman & David Hagmann & George Loewenstein, 2017. "Information Avoidance," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 55(1), pages 96-135, March.
    5. John S. Hughes & Jennifer L. Kao, 1994. "Disclosure Rules and R&D Spending Revisited," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 633-646, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:13:y:1982:i:spring:p:219-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rje.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.