IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/jspord/1011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploratory Walk As A Method Of Studying Urban Tourism Space: A Case Of Charles Bridge In Prague

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to characterise the concept and discuss the possibilities of applying exploratory walking as a method of research in urban tourism spaces. In the article, the original concept of the method is characterised and discussed based on a pilot study. The place chosen for the pilot study is Charles Bridge in Prague. The conclusions about further work on improving the method and adapting it to the research needs related to the use of urban spaces by tourists are confirmed. Such walks can be a useful research method and a potential tool for recognising and introducing social and spatial changes. The exploratory walks help to obtain more material than sedentary interviews. Despite the positive functions of the walks, the pilot study also showed that the method could not function alone. Other methods and techniques should complement it. The analyses in the article method can contribute to a better understanding of the phenomena and processes observed in urban tourist spaces, as well as to the design and implementation of changes serving improving tourist services.

Suggested Citation

  • Bazuń, Dorota & Kwiatkowski, Mariusz, 2020. "Exploratory Walk As A Method Of Studying Urban Tourism Space: A Case Of Charles Bridge In Prague," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 8(2), pages 92-106.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:jspord:1011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cieo.pt/journal/J_2_2020/article2.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Merriman, 2014. "Rethinking Mobile Methods," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 167-187, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Camarero & Renato Miguel Carmo & Sofía Santos, 2020. "Condiciones ambientales y diferenciación social en los patrones de movilidad: el caso de las desigualdades de género en el Área Metropolitana de Lisboa," Revista de Estudios Regionales, Universidades Públicas de Andalucía, vol. 0(y), pages 145-172.
    2. Silvia Marcu, 2019. "The limits to mobility: Precarious work experiences among young Eastern Europeans in Spain," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(4), pages 913-930, June.
    3. Teresa Franco, 2023. "A transport of one’s own: Women in contemporary Mexico City’s public transport through the lens of photojournalism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 3143-3157, November.
    4. Battista, Geoffrey A. & Manaugh, Kevin, 2018. "Stores and mores: Toward socializing walkability," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 53-60.
    5. Wikstrøm, Ragnhild Dahl, 2023. "The potential of combining qualitative GIS and map elicitation in daily mobility studies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Katja Kaufmann & Christoph Straganz & Tabea Bork-Hüffer, 2020. "City-Life No More? Young Adults’ Disrupted Urban Experiences and Their Digital Mediation under Covid-19," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 324-334.
    7. Ingrid Boas & Joris Schapendonk & Suzy Blondin & Annemiek Pas, 2020. "Methods as Moving Ground: Reflections on the ‘Doings’ of Mobile Methodologies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 163-146.
    8. Doody, Brendan J., 2020. "Becoming ‘a Londoner’: Migrants’ experiences and habits of everyday (im)mobilities over the life course," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    9. Paul Simpson, 2017. "A sense of the cycling environment: Felt experiences of infrastructure and atmospheres," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(2), pages 426-447, February.
    10. Jensen, Martin Trandberg & Scarles, Caroline & Cohen, Scott A., 2015. "A multisensory phenomenology of interrail mobilities," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 61-76.
    11. Rabbiosi, Chiara, 2016. "Place branding performances in tourist local food shops," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 154-168.
    12. Max Kramer, 2017. "Mobilizing Conflict Testimony: A Lens of Mobility for the Study of Documentary Practices in the Kashmir Conflict," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Kou, Lirong & Xu, Honggang & Hannam, Kevin, 2017. "Understanding seasonal mobilities, health and wellbeing to Sanya, China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 87-99.
    14. Max Kramer, 2022. "Beyond the Identitarian Deadlock: Why Mobile Methods Are Useful for Studying Media in Zones of Conflict," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 10(2), pages 289-297, December.
    15. Martina Bovo & Paola Briata & Massimo Bricocoli, 2023. "A bus as a compressed public space: Everyday multiculturalism in Milan," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(15), pages 2979-2993, November.
    16. Sabina Lawreniuk & Laurie Parsons, 2017. "Mother, grandmother, migrant: Elder translocality and the renegotiation of household roles in Cambodia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(7), pages 1664-1683, July.
    17. Horn, Julian, 2024. "Walking as an approach to the socially-ecological transformation of inclusive urban mobility systems: An explorative case study involving disabled people in Berlin," Discussion Papers, Research Group Digital Mobility and Social Differentiation SP III 2024-602, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    18. Katja Kaufmann & Christoph Straganz & Tabea Bork-Hüffer, 2020. "City-Life No More? Young Adults’ Disrupted Urban Experiences and Their Digital Mediation under Covid-19," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 324-334.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Exploratory Walk Method; Public Space; Interview;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B49 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Other
    • Z19 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Other
    • Z39 - Other Special Topics - - Tourism Economics - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:jspord:1011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Silvia Fernandes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ctalgpt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.