IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/invreg/0366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La compra pública innovadora. Análisis regional de la experiencia española

Author

Listed:
  • Peñate Valentín, María Concepción

    (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela)

  • Sánchez Carreira, María del Carmen

    (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela)

Abstract

El sector público puede actuar como consumidor para fomentar la innovación a través de la compra pública innovadora (CPI). Este instrumento de política de I+D, innovación y desarrollo, presenta una notable potencialidad, como muestra su relevancia en las economías de la OCDE. En comparación con otros instrumentos, sus principales ventajas son garantizar un mercado inicial de notable dimensión para las innovaciones desarrolladas por el sector privado; o reducir el riesgo para los proveedores que invierten en nuevas y costosas tecnologías. Para el sector público, supone mejorar la eficiencia y calidad de los servicios públicos y reducir sus costes a medio y largo plazo. El objetivo de este artículo es analizar la experiencia de CPI en España desde la perspectiva regional, centrándose en las modalidades, financiación, principales sectores, áreas de desarrollo y resultados en productos y servicios. Se analizan ochenta y cuatro casos que conforman una base de datos de elaboración propia. En general, se observa un comportamiento similar entre regiones, si bien se encuentran diferencias en la relevancia de los sectores y la financiación europea. En relación a los sectores, en las regiones más desarrolladas e innovadoras, predominan las actividades industriales y de servicios, especialmente las ramas intensivas en conocimiento. La financiación europea constituye un elemento determinante para la implementación de la CPI en las regiones menos desarrolladas e innovadoras. Los resultados sugieren que los distintos niveles de innovación y desarrollo regional condicionan la efectividad de la CPI y el desarrollo de innovaciones derivadas de su implementación.

Suggested Citation

  • Peñate Valentín, María Concepción & Sánchez Carreira, María del Carmen, 2018. "La compra pública innovadora. Análisis regional de la experiencia española," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 40, pages 79-107.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:invreg:0366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://investigacionesregionales.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2018/06/4.-Penate.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elvira Uyarra, 2016. "The impact of public procurement of innovation," Chapters, in: Jakob Edler & Paul Cunningham & Abdullah Gök & Philip Shapira (ed.), Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact, chapter 11, pages 355-381, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Fratesi, Ugo, 2007. "The Spatial Diffusion of Innovations and the Evolution of Regional Disparities," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 11, pages 131-160.
    3. Maza, Adolfo & Villaverde, José & Hierro, María, 2014. "Should cohesion policy focus on fostering R&D? Evidence from Spain," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 29, pages 139-164.
    4. Jakob Edler & Luke Georghiou & Elvira Uyarra & Jillian Yeow, 2015. "The meaning and limitations of public procurement for innovation: a supplier’s experience," Chapters, in: Charles Edquist & Nicholas S Vonortas & Jon M Zabala-Iturriagagoitia & Jakob Edler (ed.), Public Procurement for Innovation, chapter 2, pages 35-64, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Jakob Edler & Paul Cunningham & Abdullah Gök & Philip Shapira (ed.), 2016. "Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 16121, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edler, Jakob, 2023. "Demand, public procurement and transformation," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 79, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    2. Jakob Edler, 2023. "Demand, public procurement and transformation," MIOIR Working Paper Series 2023-03, The Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR), The University of Manchester.
    3. Knut Blind & Jakob Pohlisch & Anne Rainville, 2020. "Innovation and standardization as drivers of companies’ success in public procurement: an empirical analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 664-693, June.
    4. Grashof, Nils, 2021. "Putting the watering can away –Towards a targeted (problem-oriented) cluster policy framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    5. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:450-468 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Xiaoke Zhang, 2022. "Understanding innovation policy governance: A disaggregated approach," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(3), pages 303-329, May.
    7. Tammi, Timo & Saastamoinen, Jani & Reijonen, Helen, 2020. "Public procurement as a vehicle of innovation – What does the inverted-U relationship between competition and innovativeness tell us?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. Ricard Esparza-Masana, 2022. "Towards Smart Specialisation 2.0. Main Challenges When Updating Strategies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 635-655, March.
    9. Liotard, Isabelle & Revest, Valérie, 2018. "Contests as innovation policy instruments: Lessons from the US federal agencies' experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 57-69.
    10. Albert Bravo-Biosca, 2020. "Experimental Innovation Policy," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 20(1), pages 191-232.
    11. Haico te Kulve & Wouter Boon & Kornelia Konrad & Tjerk Jan Schuitmaker, 2018. "Influencing the direction of innovation processes: the shadow of authorities in demand articulation," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 455-467.
    12. Grashof, Nils, 2020. "Putting the watering can away Towards a targeted (problem-oriented) cluster policy framework," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/4, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    13. Brusselaers, Jan & Verbeke, Wim & Mettepenningen, Evy & Buysse, Jeroen, 2020. "Unravelling the true drivers for eco-certified wood consumption by introducing scarcity," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    14. Aalto, Eero & Gustafsson, Robin, 2020. "Innovation Promotion Rationales and Impacts – A Review," ETLA Reports 99, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    15. Liu, Xiaofeng & Miao, Haoran & Zhou, Wenxiang & Qiu, Yumin, 2024. "The impact of government procurement on green technological innovation: Evidence from manufacturing sector in china," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    16. Daniel Catalá‐Pérez & María de‐Miguel‐Molina, 2021. "Analyzing Territorial and Sectorial Dimensions of Public–Private Partnerships in Science, Technology, and Innovation policies," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(1), pages 113-138, January.
    17. Sofie Sandin, 2020. "Making Use of Evaluations to Support a Transition towards a More Sustainable Energy System and Society—An Assessment of Current and Potential Use among Swedish State Agencies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, October.
    18. Havas, Atttila & Weber, K. Matthias, 2017. "The role of foresight in shaping the next production revolution," MPRA Paper 100374, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Giliberto Capano & Michael Howlett, 2020. "The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    20. Shim, Yongwoon & Lee, Heejin & Fomin, Vladislav, 2019. "What benefits couldn't ‘Joyn’ enjoy?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 125-134.
    21. Nicholas Martin & Christian Matt & Crispin Niebel & Knut Blind, 2019. "How Data Protection Regulation Affects Startup Innovation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1307-1324, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    compra pública innovadora; política de innovación; diversidad regional; España;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:invreg:0366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IIRR-JORR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aecrrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.