IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ecoint/0610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Another Empirical Look at the Theory of Overlapping Demands - Un altro sguardo empirico alla teoria delle overlapping demands

Author

Listed:
  • Dhakal, Dharmendra

    (Department of Economics and Finance, Tennessee State University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA)

  • Pradhan, Gyan

    (Department of Economics, Eastern Kentucky University)

  • Upadhyaya, Kamal P.

    (Department of Economics and Finance, University of New Haven)

Abstract

Linder’s theory of overlapping demands suggests that international trade in manufactured goods will be stronger between countries with similar per capita income levels. In this paper, we test the Linder hypothesis for five East Asian countries using panel data for five years. In addition to including bilateral trade data for these countries, we include their bilateral trade data with their other major trading partners. A modified gravity model is developed for this purpose. The model is first estimated for each year in the sample. In addition, a panel data set is constructed and estimated using a fixed-effects estimator. The overall results of our estimations are quite robust and do not provide support for Linder’s hypothesis. - Secondo la teoria delle overlapping demands di Linder, il commercio internazionale di beni manufatti risulterebbe essere maggiore tra i paesi che presentano livelli di reddito procapite simili. In questo studio tale teoria viene applicata a cinque paesi dell’est asiatico utilizzando dati panel per un periodo di cinque anni. Oltre a considerare i dati del commercio bilaterale tra questi paesi, sono stati inclusi anche i dati del commercio bilaterale con gli altri principali partner commerciali. A questo proposito è stato sviluppato un modello gravitazionale modificato, stimato prima per ogni anno del campione. È stato realizzato un panel data set attraverso un fixed effect estimator. Le stime ottenute risultano nel complesso robuste e non forniscono evidenze a sostegno dell’ipotesi di Linder.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhakal, Dharmendra & Pradhan, Gyan & Upadhyaya, Kamal P., 2011. "“Another Empirical Look at the Theory of Overlapping Demands - Un altro sguardo empirico alla teoria delle overlapping demands," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 64(1), pages 103-113.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iei1946.it/RePEc/ccg/DHAKAL%20103_113.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmen Fillat-Castejon & Jose Ma Serrano-sanz, 2004. "Linder Revisited: Trade and Development in the Spanish Economy," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 323-348.
    2. Thomas Kennedy & Richard McHugh, 1983. "Taste similarity and trade intensity: A Test of the linder hypothesis for United States exports," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 119(1), pages 84-96, March.
    3. Thursby, Jerry G & Thursby, Marie C, 1987. "Bilateral Trade Flows, the Linder Hypothesis, and Exchange Risk," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 69(3), pages 488-495, August.
    4. Carsten Fink & Beata Smarzynska Javorcik & Mariana Spatareanu, 2005. "Income-Related Biases in International Trade: What Do Trademark Registration Data Tell Us?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 141(1), pages 79-103, April.
    5. World Bank, 2006. "World Development Indicators 2006," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 8151.
    6. Bergstrand, Jeffrey H, 1990. "The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the Linder Hypothesis and the Determinants of Bilateral Intra-industry Trade," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 100(403), pages 1216-1229, December.
    7. Changkyu Choi, 2002. "Linder hypothesis revisited," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(9), pages 601-605.
    8. Peter Chow & Mitchell Kellman Yochanan, 1999. "A test of the Linder hypothesis in Pacific NIC trade 1965-1990," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 175-182.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ari Kokko & Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall, 2014. "Distance, Transaction Costs, and Preferences in European Trade," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 87-120, June.
    2. Tania Georgia VICIU & Larisa MIHOREANU & Carmen COSTEA, 2016. "An Essay on the Applicability of the Linder Hypothesis in Determining the Patterns of the Romanian International Trade," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 5(1), pages 52-62, March.
    3. C. Wernerheim & M. Waples, 2013. "Demand patterns and Canada’s trade in services," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 159-181, June.
    4. Haq, Zahoor Ul & Meilke, Karl D., 2008. "Differentiated Agri-Food Product Trade and the Linder Effect," Working Papers 46629, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    5. Thomas L. Vollrath & Mark J. Gehlhar & Charles B. Hallahan, 2009. "Bilateral Import Protection, Free Trade Agreements, and Other Factors Influencing Trade Flows in Agriculture and Clothing," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 298-317, June.
    6. Kiyong Keum, 2010. "Tourism flows and trade theory: a panel data analysis with the gravity model," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 44(3), pages 541-557, June.
    7. Haq, Zahoor Ul & Meilke, Karl D. & Cranfield, John A.L., 2011. "The Gravity Model and the Problem of Zero's in Agrifood Trade," Working Papers 116851, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    8. Gründler, Klaus & Hillman, Arye L., 2021. "Ambiguous protection," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Philip Sauré, 2012. "Bounded Love of Variety and Patterns of Trade," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 645-674, September.
    10. Vollrath, Thomas L. & Gehlhar, Mark J. & Hallahan, Charles B., 2007. "Bilateral Protection and Other Determinants of Trade: A Gravity Model Approach," 2007 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, 2007, Portland, Oregon 9804, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Hummels, David & Lee, Kwan Yong, 2018. "The income elasticity of import demand: Micro evidence and an application," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 20-34.
    12. Tamaş Anca, 2020. "Why should the gravity model be taught in business education?," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 422-433, July.
    13. Nawaraj S. Paudel & Sajal Lahiri, 2021. "Do politically and economically similar states in the U.S.A. trade more with each other?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(3), pages 1541-1552.
    14. Daniel Gbetnkom, 2006. "On the Empirics of Market Integration in ECOWAS," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 289-303.
    15. Zhang, Daowei & Li, Yanshu, 2009. "Forest endowment, logging restrictions, and China's wood products trade," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 46-53, March.
    16. Roger White & Bedassa Tadesse, 2011. "International Migration and Economic Integration," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14318.
    17. Syed Adnan Haider Ali Shah Bukhari & Mohsin Hassnain Ahmad & Shaista Alam & Syeda Sonia Haider Ali Shah Bukhari & Muhammad Shabihuddin Butt, 2005. "An Empirical Analysis of the Linder," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 44(3), pages 307-320.
    18. M. A. Mcpherson & M. R. Redfearn & M. A. Tieslau, 2000. "A Re-Examination of the Linder Hypothesis: A Random-Effects Tobit Approach," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 123-136.
    19. Changkyu Choi, 2002. "Linder hypothesis revisited," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(9), pages 601-605.
    20. Claudia Bernasconi, 2013. "Similarity of income distributions and the extensive and intensive margin of bilateral trade flows," ECON - Working Papers 115, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Linder Hypothesis; East Asian Countries; Panel Data;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Procopio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cacogit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.